Topic: If this picture of Chuck Schumer smiling and holding his grandchild does not make you smile...
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU started this discussion 7 years ago #81,114
...then I genuinely pity you!Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #942,305
Do you really like him or is this supposed to make us hate him or something?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,312
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Maybe you need to stop feeling like you need either love or hate things. Just live in the moment and see a picture without overlaying some weird worldview on it.
Maybe you need to stop feeling like you need either love or hate things. Just live in the moment and see a picture without overlaying some weird worldview on it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,314
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,315
Who the fuck is Chuck Scummer and why would he holding a baby make me smiley?
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,316
@942,314 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's sounds like he just likes the photo. Why do you think he needs a motive?
It's sounds like he just likes the photo. Why do you think he needs a motive?
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,317
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,318
@942,305 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I just saw the pic and thought it was cute. He's like my Jewish grandpa! I like him mildly and I don't envy his current job.
I just saw the pic and thought it was cute. He's like my Jewish grandpa! I like him mildly and I don't envy his current job.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 28 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,319
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,320
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 17 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,321
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,322
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,323
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yeah he's a bad fit for minority leader, dems right now really want a "go for the throat" kind of ideologue but idk if that's the best course as a minority party in a chamber of Congress.
Yeah he's a bad fit for minority leader, dems right now really want a "go for the throat" kind of ideologue but idk if that's the best course as a minority party in a chamber of Congress.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 18 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,324
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,325
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 22 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,326
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,327
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I thought you could tell by looking. What would you need to make that determination?
@942,325 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Call your mother. Thanks.
I thought you could tell by looking. What would you need to make that determination?
@942,325 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Call your mother. Thanks.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 13 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,328
@942,324 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Oh are you asking because he is a politician? As a politician, he has probably done some horrible things.
Oh are you asking because he is a politician? As a politician, he has probably done some horrible things.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,329
@942,321 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
He's been in the news, but it's mostly just about him doing his job. That's not really a scandal.
He's been in the news, but it's mostly just about him doing his job. That's not really a scandal.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,330
@942,327 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I call her every Sunday and I just saw her over Thanksgiving. Call YOUR mother.
I call her every Sunday and I just saw her over Thanksgiving. Call YOUR mother.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 34 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,331
@942,327 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
It depends on if you mean pedophile or child molester probably. With some people you can tell by their actions or possibly media preferences. As a politician, he may have molested kids, but he might have done other things, like murder people.
Also if you molest someone for money but not for sexual gratification, are you a pedophile?
It depends on if you mean pedophile or child molester probably. With some people you can tell by their actions or possibly media preferences. As a politician, he may have molested kids, but he might have done other things, like murder people.
Also if you molest someone for money but not for sexual gratification, are you a pedophile?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 46 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,332
@942,329 (C)
I googled him and all these articles came up like "Why does Schumer think that Trump is so popular?"
I googled him and all these articles came up like "Why does Schumer think that Trump is so popular?"
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,334
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
A senator having opinions about the POTUS isn't a scandal. Do you think anytime the news mentions a politician that it's a scandal?
A senator having opinions about the POTUS isn't a scandal. Do you think anytime the news mentions a politician that it's a scandal?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,335
@942,331 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Also if you molest someone for money but not for sexual gratification, are you a pedophile?
How does that work, though? Kids usually don't have much money. I thought it went the other way around actually, like Michael Jackson paying hush money.
> Also if you molest someone for money but not for sexual gratification, are you a pedophile?
How does that work, though? Kids usually don't have much money. I thought it went the other way around actually, like Michael Jackson paying hush money.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,337
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 59 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,340
@942,335 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I think that they get money from people who watch videos and also by money I meant perks like positions of power. People who compromise themselves get rewarded.
I think that they get money from people who watch videos and also by money I meant perks like positions of power. People who compromise themselves get rewarded.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,343
@942,337 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I just think the word "scandal" implies some kind of ethical wrongdoing, which isn't what's going on here. Schumer just did stuff that made a subset of his party's vocal left wing upset. Same as when he caved on the last shutdown. It's more of an intraparty dispute over messaging/strategy than a scandal.
I just think the word "scandal" implies some kind of ethical wrongdoing, which isn't what's going on here. Schumer just did stuff that made a subset of his party's vocal left wing upset. Same as when he caved on the last shutdown. It's more of an intraparty dispute over messaging/strategy than a scandal.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,344
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,346
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 16 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,347
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,348
@942,343 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I like seeing these words get debased to the point where they don't mean anything anymore. It's kind of postmodern. Language means whatever you want it to mean.
I like seeing these words get debased to the point where they don't mean anything anymore. It's kind of postmodern. Language means whatever you want it to mean.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,353
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,355
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,382
cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,419
It's kind of an ominous looking picture. He looks malevolent, like a Jewish caricature of some kind.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,420
What if the child is the Anti Christ?
Anonymous H double-posted this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,421
Also, one of Schumer's thumbs looks like a small uncircumcised penis.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,422
Which one has more hair?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,424
Captain Kate Carr joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,483
Whon
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,487
Chuck Schumer RelatedFake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,494
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,495
@942,419 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
That is true and also exactly the kind of antisemitism I will not stand for.
That is true and also exactly the kind of antisemitism I will not stand for.