Topic: Trump's 2020 dilemma..
Robert former owner of the Gol started this discussion 7 years ago #80,562
face it...the Dumbocrats will try something (even if it's ridiculous) to unseat him..
he is either going to have to deport a million illegal immigrants (please God) or repeal the same sex marriage thing..
either of these things would guarantee a sure victory..
if the Dumbocrats have any sense at all...(as if lol) they will just sit back and not push too hard and not force him to go hardcore..
he is either going to have to deport a million illegal immigrants (please God) or repeal the same sex marriage thing..
either of these things would guarantee a sure victory..
if the Dumbocrats have any sense at all...(as if lol) they will just sit back and not push too hard and not force him to go hardcore..
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 25 minutes later[^] [v] #937,335
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) is a landmark civil rights case in which the
Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right
to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right
to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
This was a Spit decision 5 to 4.
Trumps planting of two right wing pro rape Republicans could revisit this case.
Trumps best chance for 2020 is to rally up the KKK and White Nationalists - Most reside in the deep south. Deep south is that part of US that attempted to split off from USA and create a 100% Slave run operation. Fortunately the southern soldiers drank a lot and were quickly put in their place.
Today we have member bert here on mc, who in that fine tradition of service to country failed to make the grade. Typical of a southern gentlemen.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #937,353
@previous (B)
failed to make the grade..
listen very closely...I served four years...and had good evaluations for 9/10 of that time..
failed to make the grade..
listen very closely...I served four years...and had good evaluations for 9/10 of that time..
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,356
@previous (A)9/10 of that time..
This is an example of what happens when a Navy crew goofs up and lets a cargo ship hit it. 9/10 was not exactly good enough.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,357
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,358
@previous (D)
And that is why the South lost the civil war. Real men fight on. Pussy's turn and run away.
The good news is that is the basis of Trump supporters. 2020 they will be too drunk to vote.
And that is why the South lost the civil war. Real men fight on. Pussy's turn and run away.
The good news is that is the basis of Trump supporters. 2020 they will be too drunk to vote.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,362
It's time for trump to scrap democracy and become the emperor of mankind.
MAGA
MAGA
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,370
@937,335 (B)
>
>
> This was a Spit decision 5 to 4.
>
> Trumps planting of two right wing pro rape Republicans could revisit this case.
>
> Trumps best chance for 2020 is to rally up the KKK and White Nationalists - Most reside in the deep south. Deep south is that part of US that attempted to split off from USA and create a 100% Slave run operation. Fortunately the southern soldiers drank a lot and were quickly put in their place.
>
> Today we have member bert here on mc, who in that fine tradition of service to country failed to make the grade. Typical of a southern gentlemen.
The KKK are all Democrats though
>
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) is a landmark civil rights case in which the
>
> Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right
>
> to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
>
> Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right
>
> to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
>
> This was a Spit decision 5 to 4.
>
> Trumps planting of two right wing pro rape Republicans could revisit this case.
>
> Trumps best chance for 2020 is to rally up the KKK and White Nationalists - Most reside in the deep south. Deep south is that part of US that attempted to split off from USA and create a 100% Slave run operation. Fortunately the southern soldiers drank a lot and were quickly put in their place.
>
> Today we have member bert here on mc, who in that fine tradition of service to country failed to make the grade. Typical of a southern gentlemen.
The KKK are all Democrats though
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,385
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,392
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 51 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,425
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,477
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 46 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,487
Sometimes Bert is useful. This post is like a window to the simplistic world of Trump's base. A world where an opposition party trying to win is outrageous and against their own interests, and repealing gay marriage is an election winner.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,550
@previous (J)
the Dumbocrats are stupid...but they are treacherous and will not avoid any dirty tricks to win..
You have to go hard in the paint against such evil..
the Dumbocrats are stupid...but they are treacherous and will not avoid any dirty tricks to win..
You have to go hard in the paint against such evil..
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,565
@previous (A)
This is exactly why George Washington spoke against the formation of political parties. Idiots like you don't take real issues into account. They just support their party and spout off inane bullshit, to make themselves feel right.
This is exactly why George Washington spoke against the formation of political parties. Idiots like you don't take real issues into account. They just support their party and spout off inane bullshit, to make themselves feel right.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,575
@previous (I)
you don't know a gd thing about Washington..
I bet you would bust a nut if faggot Bernie had a real chance..gtfo..
you don't know a gd thing about Washington..
I bet you would bust a nut if faggot Bernie had a real chance..gtfo..
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,579
@previous (A)
Article:George Washington's Views on Political Parties
Read a book once in a while, you uneducated jackass.
Party lines and loyalty were drawn to the point of personal bitterness and public destructiveness. Such division along party lines represented the most severe split between the two political factions since the inception of the republic. It made a deep impact upon Washington and the memory must have been in his mind as he wrote about the very real capacity of political parties to destroy the fragile unity holding the nation together.
Article:George Washington's Views on Political Parties
Read a book once in a while, you uneducated jackass.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,588
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,591
@previous (A)
What does that have to do with any of this? I've never even stated my views on the bible. You are one of the dumbest fucking people I've ever talked to.
What does that have to do with any of this? I've never even stated my views on the bible. You are one of the dumbest fucking people I've ever talked to.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,598
@previous (I)
> Such division along party lines represented the most severe split between the two political factions since the inception of the republic.
how much time do you think had passed between this viewpoint attributed to Washington...and the 'inception of the republic'..
think about that and then tell me that such a supposedly realization is profound in any sense of the word..
retard..
> Such division along party lines represented the most severe split between the two political factions since the inception of the republic.
how much time do you think had passed between this viewpoint attributed to Washington...and the 'inception of the republic'..
think about that and then tell me that such a supposedly realization is profound in any sense of the word..
retard..
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 46 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,599
@previous (A)
It was in his farewell address after he finished his second term as president you boob.
It was in his farewell address after he finished his second term as president you boob.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,601
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
you are attempting to make this seem profound merely because it was said by washington...who no doubt owned slaves by the way..
the fact is he was basing his opinion on a very short period of time..
you are attempting to make this seem profound merely because it was said by washington...who no doubt owned slaves by the way..
the fact is he was basing his opinion on a very short period of time..
WTF? replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,604
@previous (A)
That God you believe in also owned slaves. After all he made them. He also made Natzi's and Osama Bien Laden.
That God you believe in also owned slaves. After all he made them. He also made Natzi's and Osama Bien Laden.
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,606
@937,598 (A)
About 6-7 years, but this holds no grounds either. As great ideas often come in an instant. They talk about(in that article, in that very paragraph) how Washington witnessed turmoil in the voting public, ever since the formation of poltical parties. Which were formed by the public during Washington's first term. Before that, there were no political parties. Everybody wanted GW to be president so badly, that despite the fact he didn't want the position he still took it. No parties necessary. Even after they had formed, people begged him to take a second term. Are you simply saying George Washington wasn't perceptive enough to see the selfdestructive nature of this new political system? That doesn't seem very patriotic to me. Read the fucking article, and try forming a rebuttal that actually has some sort of meaning.
About 6-7 years, but this holds no grounds either. As great ideas often come in an instant. They talk about(in that article, in that very paragraph) how Washington witnessed turmoil in the voting public, ever since the formation of poltical parties. Which were formed by the public during Washington's first term. Before that, there were no political parties. Everybody wanted GW to be president so badly, that despite the fact he didn't want the position he still took it. No parties necessary. Even after they had formed, people begged him to take a second term. Are you simply saying George Washington wasn't perceptive enough to see the selfdestructive nature of this new political system? That doesn't seem very patriotic to me. Read the fucking article, and try forming a rebuttal that actually has some sort of meaning.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #937,609
@previous (I)
are you that bird brained...are you really..
ok I tire of this...but I will attempt to make one point here...take it or leave it..
Washington...and many other leaders and policy makers of his and later times were wise and were gentleman with great character and integrity..
our constitution...and the wisdom of Washington and other who followed him are what has enabled us to be the awesome country we have always been..
howsomever consider the term. check and balances....sure you may attribute that to mean the way the three branches of our government operate to achieve fairness and efficiency and such...but also it applies...in my view to how we have the different political parties and how such a system protects us from awful shenanigans..
pffffft..
I'm tired...whatever..
people that say the two parties are like professional wrestling where the two sides fake fight and then meet up and party are a dumbass..
there is right and there is wrong..
are you that bird brained...are you really..
ok I tire of this...but I will attempt to make one point here...take it or leave it..
Washington...and many other leaders and policy makers of his and later times were wise and were gentleman with great character and integrity..
our constitution...and the wisdom of Washington and other who followed him are what has enabled us to be the awesome country we have always been..
howsomever consider the term. check and balances....sure you may attribute that to mean the way the three branches of our government operate to achieve fairness and efficiency and such...but also it applies...in my view to how we have the different political parties and how such a system protects us from awful shenanigans..
pffffft..
I'm tired...whatever..
people that say the two parties are like professional wrestling where the two sides fake fight and then meet up and party are a dumbass..
there is right and there is wrong..
(Edited 2 minutes later.)