Members of Congress are also provided with an annual allowance intended to defray expenses related carrying out their congressional duties, including "official office expenses, including staff, mail, travel between a Member's district or state and Washington, DC, and other goods and services."
So no to rent in either place.
q. joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^][v]#935,983
@previous (Syntax)
theres no way we pay those lazy pieces of garbage that much, i hope youre wrong. congress as an aggregate whole is worth about 193k :I
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^][v]#935,992
Speaker of House soon 2B Nancy will get $223,500/yr with HUGE STAFF
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#936,018
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#936,021
@previous (F)
I'm thinking that the quoate is inaccurate and perhaps entirely made up
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#936,024
@936,018 (F)
Instead of lowering prices, why not just make money more valuable. On January 1, everyone goes to the bank and you get to trade in all your $1 bills for $100 bills. In order to stop it benefiting the rich though, this only applies to $1 bills - $5/10/20/50/100 bills keep their same face value as before. So the poor guy with $4 in his wallet now has $400, placing him on par with the rich bastard who already had $400.
Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#936,032
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
No way. That could cause a massive stripper shortage