Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#934,004
kook is intersex
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,009
1.7 percent of human births might be intersex, including variations that may not become apparent until, for example, puberty, or until attempting to conceive.
Number is insignificant.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 24 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,010
@previous (C)
It proves that there are at least three genders.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,012
@934,009 (C) > 1.7 percent > Number is insignificant
Really?
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,014
1.7 percent of human births might be intersex, including variations that may not become apparent until, for example, puberty, or until attempting to conceive.
> >Number is insignificant.
not really. what's the point of possibly marginalizing 130 million people - if your numbers are correct - because '1.7%' seems insignificant, anyway? but that's not even about gender
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,024
I got the number by asking Google what is the percent of Human Hermaphrodites and with multiple news feeds on I messed up a weee bit but the number seems valid
Grrrrrrr I have to finish a presentation for work 2morrow and with Election stuff I should NOT be playing here.
> not really. what's the point of possibly marginalizing 130 million people
And I ask you why should I worry about Grains of Sand based on irregularity?
Anon B SHIT HAPPENS
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 31 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,025
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#934,034
@934,024 (Syntax) > And I ask you why should I worry about Grains of Sand based on irregularity?
that's a very dangerous and evil-hearted sentiment!
> I got the number by asking Google what is the percent of Human Hermaphrodites
showing your age there
Intersex people were previously referred to as hermaphrodites, "congenital eunuchs", or congenitally "frigid". Such terms have fallen out of favor; in particular, the term "hermaphrodite" is considered to be misleading, stigmatizing, and scientifically specious.
Currently, hermaphroditism is not to be confused with intersex, as the former refers only to a specific phenotypical presentation of sex organs and the latter to a more complex combination of phenotypical and genotypical presentation
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,125
@934,118 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Nazigender is a thing now. Their pronouns are führer and führim
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,126
@previous (H)
For real though, this people on here who are saying such things don't believe than.more than one gender. They just believe that saying so is trashy and indicates a right leaning person.
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,129
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
They are bad people virtue signaling
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,144
@previous (H)
Sad because I like them for the most part
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 10 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,384
@934,126 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > For real though, this people on here who are saying such things don't believe than.more than one gender
Are you also part of the One-Gender movement?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#934,387