Topic: ready for the big win for the Republicans..
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #80,202
freshly showered..Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #933,606
Stained shirt
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #933,608
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,610
there's not any stains on this shirt..
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,612
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 8 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,613
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,614
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,615
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,616
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,619
I wonder if the ladies like my hairy chest..
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,620
@933,615 (A)
DAMN Dude so now you are drawing Unemployment - So plans on what's next?
I do suggest you move to some other place where the Football team has a more better chance - Yes there is a chance re odds that Vols will win Sat given at home track record BUTTTTTT dats about IT
Got to admit that after looking at where u were working it was HORRID HORRID Place to work and you held on much longer than most there
DAMN Dude so now you are drawing Unemployment - So plans on what's next?
I do suggest you move to some other place where the Football team has a more better chance - Yes there is a chance re odds that Vols will win Sat given at home track record BUTTTTTT dats about IT
Got to admit that after looking at where u were working it was HORRID HORRID Place to work and you held on much longer than most there
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,622
q. joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,630
why in ever loving fuck would u want republicans to win, excet maybe that u hate immigrants? which congress hasnt actually done dick about anyway
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 53 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,632
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,634
@933,622 (F)
Careful don’t start taking about piss or you’ll get Meta excited! He’s a Republican Piss Piggy!
Careful don’t start taking about piss or you’ll get Meta excited! He’s a Republican Piss Piggy!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,640
@933,632 (C)
No, the Cotton/Perdue bill endorsed by Trump drastically reduced legal immigration into the U.S. as well. Republicans don't want immigrants.
No, the Cotton/Perdue bill endorsed by Trump drastically reduced legal immigration into the U.S. as well. Republicans don't want immigrants.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,642
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Republicans don't want immigrants.
Chain migration is different than a merit based system. And to conclude Republicans don't want immigrants at all is simply not true. They want legal immigrants, merit based. Proof me wrong.
> Republicans don't want immigrants.
Chain migration is different than a merit based system. And to conclude Republicans don't want immigrants at all is simply not true. They want legal immigrants, merit based. Proof me wrong.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 15 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,644
> freshly showered
That time of year, already?
That time of year, already?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,646
@933,642 (C)
I...just did? The Cotton/Perdue bill ended the diversity lottery and instituted a merit based system while cutting green cards IN HALF and limiting refugees to 50,000. If it were true that republicans wanted just a different type of immigrant (more skilled, wealthier, or whatever), they would have reformed the approval process and left the amount of immigrants the same, or hell, increased it.
I...just did? The Cotton/Perdue bill ended the diversity lottery and instituted a merit based system while cutting green cards IN HALF and limiting refugees to 50,000. If it were true that republicans wanted just a different type of immigrant (more skilled, wealthier, or whatever), they would have reformed the approval process and left the amount of immigrants the same, or hell, increased it.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,648
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So they do want immigrants. Yet you claim they don't want immigrants. What is it?
So they do want immigrants. Yet you claim they don't want immigrants. What is it?
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,652
@previous (C)
What? They want to cut immigration in half and you think they're pro-immigration? I'm confused.
What? They want to cut immigration in half and you think they're pro-immigration? I'm confused.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,654
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You said they want no immigrants then you continue to explain they want a merit based immigration system. You make contradicting statements.
You said they want no immigrants then you continue to explain they want a merit based immigration system. You make contradicting statements.
Anonymous C double-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,655
@933,652 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Where I state I think they're pro-immigration? Stop making things up.
Where I state I think they're pro-immigration? Stop making things up.
cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,658
This thread is going well!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #933,664
@933,654 (C)
"Don't want immigrants" =/= "want 0 immigrants". They want to dramatically reduce the number of immigrants.
@933,655 (C)
You say they want legal, merit based immigrants and yet when they introduce bills to do that, they dramatically reduce the number of immigrants we're accepting. Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
"Don't want immigrants" =/= "want 0 immigrants". They want to dramatically reduce the number of immigrants.
@933,655 (C)
You say they want legal, merit based immigrants and yet when they introduce bills to do that, they dramatically reduce the number of immigrants we're accepting. Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,668
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
Oh, okay. Thats your assumption. Trump literally stated he loves immigrants, legal ones and merit based. But you're free to believe they're against all immigrants. Great reasoning!
Funny how you got triggered so much by me posting "legal immigrants". Shouldn't all immigrants come legally?
> Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
Oh, okay. Thats your assumption. Trump literally stated he loves immigrants, legal ones and merit based. But you're free to believe they're against all immigrants. Great reasoning!
Funny how you got triggered so much by me posting "legal immigrants". Shouldn't all immigrants come legally?
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,669
@933,664 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)https://www.vox.com/2018/2/13/16466542/trump-h-2b-guest-workers
3 Trump properties posted 144 openings for seasonal jobs. Only one went to a US worker.
“America First” doesn’t seem to apply to the president’s own businesses.
properties in New York and Florida revealed that only one out of 144 jobs went to a US worker from 2016 to the end of 2017. Foreign guest workers with H-2B visas got the rest.
“America First” doesn’t seem to apply to the president’s own businesses.
properties in New York and Florida revealed that only one out of 144 jobs went to a US worker from 2016 to the end of 2017. Foreign guest workers with H-2B visas got the rest.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,671
@933,668 (C)
It's not an assumption, it's literally the words in the bill. What Trump says he likes has nothing to do with it (not that his words are worth much).
Also how am I "triggered"? I am just disagreeing with you.
It's not an assumption, it's literally the words in the bill. What Trump says he likes has nothing to do with it (not that his words are worth much).
Also how am I "triggered"? I am just disagreeing with you.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,672
@933,668 (C)
> Trump literally stated
Trump states a lot of things. The word vomit that falls from his mouth is not policy, proof of his positions, or related to reality.
> Trump literally stated
Trump states a lot of things. The word vomit that falls from his mouth is not policy, proof of his positions, or related to reality.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,673
@933,671 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The words in the bill literally state the Republicans want no immigrants or immigrations at all? Show me.
The words in the bill literally state the Republicans want no immigrants or immigrations at all? Show me.
Anonymous C double-posted this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,674
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,676
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,678
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,682
@933,673 (C)
No because that's not the position I'm defending. I think this might just be a linguistic/semantic difference. I'm saying Republicans want dramatically less immigration, contrary to the wishes of the broader American public, for reasons that I cannot see as grounded in compassion,
No because that's not the position I'm defending. I think this might just be a linguistic/semantic difference. I'm saying Republicans want dramatically less immigration, contrary to the wishes of the broader American public, for reasons that I cannot see as grounded in compassion,
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,685
@933,674 (C)
I disagreed with your assessment that Republicans' only issue is with illegal immigration. Obviously they also don't like how many legal immigrants are coming in or they wouldn't have proposed to cut that in half.
I disagreed with your assessment that Republicans' only issue is with illegal immigration. Obviously they also don't like how many legal immigrants are coming in or they wouldn't have proposed to cut that in half.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,686
@933,682 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
to
> I'm saying Republicans want dramatically less immigration
It's like saying I don't anything to drink vs I want less to drink. Its not the same. This is going nowhere.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Where did I state that? Stop putting words in my mouth. I didn't "asses" their only issue is with illegal immigration. I posted two words and you take all that from it? Amazing.
I'm done.
> Which tells me they don't really want immigrants.
to
> I'm saying Republicans want dramatically less immigration
It's like saying I don't anything to drink vs I want less to drink. Its not the same. This is going nowhere.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Where did I state that? Stop putting words in my mouth. I didn't "asses" their only issue is with illegal immigration. I posted two words and you take all that from it? Amazing.
I'm done.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,687
@previous (C)
Ok, though for the record, nowhere did I say I think republicans want literally zero immigration (because I don't think that). That was some kind of rhetorical miscommunication between us.
Ok, though for the record, nowhere did I say I think republicans want literally zero immigration (because I don't think that). That was some kind of rhetorical miscommunication between us.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,690
@933,678 (C)
Well following the claim that "republicans don't want immigrants", a discussion started where the phrase was repeated several times, except the word "they" was used in place of the word "republicans" (At the start of the discussion meaning the mainstream Republicans).
You said
> Trump literally stated he loves immigrants, legal ones and merit based. But you're free to believe they're against all immigrants.
For this argument to logically stand, it requires that one accepts that Donald Trump can speak for the mainstream republicans.
Well following the claim that "republicans don't want immigrants", a discussion started where the phrase was repeated several times, except the word "they" was used in place of the word "republicans" (At the start of the discussion meaning the mainstream Republicans).
You said
> Trump literally stated he loves immigrants, legal ones and merit based. But you're free to believe they're against all immigrants.
For this argument to logically stand, it requires that one accepts that Donald Trump can speak for the mainstream republicans.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,691
@933,687 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Republicans don't want immigrants.
That pretty much implies zero immigration. But I said I was done. So yeah.
> Republicans don't want immigrants.
That pretty much implies zero immigration. But I said I was done. So yeah.
Anonymous C double-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,692
@933,690 (B)
Why wouldn't he speak for mainstream Republicans? Whomever they are, they voted him into office. Or are you asserting mainstream Republicans didn't vote him into office?
Why wouldn't he speak for mainstream Republicans? Whomever they are, they voted him into office. Or are you asserting mainstream Republicans didn't vote him into office?
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,693
@933,691 (C)
That's not how I read that phrase but I see how others would, sorry for the unclear phrasing.
That's not how I read that phrase but I see how others would, sorry for the unclear phrasing.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,695
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I you don't want anything to eat, I assume you don't want anything to eat. Not less to eat as you already stated you don't want anything to eat.
I you don't want anything to eat, I assume you don't want anything to eat. Not less to eat as you already stated you don't want anything to eat.
Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,698
If you don't want anything to eat, I'm going to pretend you are starving yourself and then call you triggered.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,703
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #933,706
Trump is worth 500 Obammys..
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #933,771
