Topic: Another Kavanaugh accuser admits that she lied
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC started this discussion 7 years ago#80,077
There was more than one?
By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Saturday, November 3, 2018
One of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s accusers admitted this week that she made up her lurid tale of a backseat car rape, saying it “was a tactic” to try to derail the judge’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Judiciary Committee revealed the fraud in a letter to the FBI and Justice Department Friday, asking them to prosecute Judy Munro-Leighton for lying to and obstructing Congress.
Mr. Grassley said Ms. Munro-Leighton is a left-wing activist who hijacked another “Jane Doe” anonymous report about a backseat rape and claimed it as her own story, calling it a “vicious assault.”
“I am Jane Doe from Oceanside CA — Kavanaugh raped me,” Ms. Munro-Leighton wrote in an Oct. 3 email claiming to have been a victim of the judge.
Mr. Grassley’s investigators tried to reach her for a month but were unsuccessful until this week, when they spoke to her by phone and she confessed that she was not the original Jane Doe, and “did that as a way to grab attention.”
She admitted to the false allegation, and said she has actually never met Justice Kavanaugh.
“I was angry, and I sent it out,” she told investigators.
“In short, during the committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted committee resources,” Mr. Grassley wrote. “When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a ‘ploy,’ and a ‘tactic.’ She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.”
You'll drive yourself mad trying to figure out why people do the shit they do.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,485
@previous (C)
I'll never understand people. I feel like an alien sometimes
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,489
@932,477 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
She should have gone with the no facts accusation. Someone somewhere at sometime did something, and no one corroborates the story. That gets you $800,000 on GoFundMe
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,495
@previous (B)
Do you think that we should heavily prosecute false rape accusers?
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,498
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes. Big difference between not proving rape, and knowingly false accusations though.
Do you think the treatment of Kavanaugh has turned out well for Democrats?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,503
@previous (B)
No. It has made everything worse. And there has been a precedent set where accusing the politicians of your opposite party with rape, is becoming the norm.
We are going to.start seeing it happening to Democrats as well
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#932,506