Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Cell Phone Radiation May Affect Memory Performance In Adolescents, Study Finds

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #79,934

Externally hosted imageScience Daily reports on a Swiss study to be published in full on Monday. Short summary: Frequent exposure to cell phone radiation on the right side of the head appears to be affecting figural memory performance in adolescents studied."Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields may have adverse effects on the development of memory performance of specific brain regions exposed during mobile phone use.


These are the findings of a study involving nearly 700 adolescents in Switzerland. The investigation, led by the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), will be published on Monday, 23 July 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

The study to be published found that cumulative RF-EMF brain exposure from mobile phone use over one year may have a negative effect on the development of figural memory performance in adolescents, confirming prior results published in 2015.

Figural memory is mainly located in the right brain hemisphere and association with RF-EMF was more pronounced in adolescents using the mobile phone on the right side of the head. 'This may suggest that indeed RF-EMF absorbed by the brain is responsible for the observed associations.' said Martin Röösli, Head of Environmental Exposures and Health at Swiss TPH."

Captain Kate Carr joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 39 seconds later[^] [v] #930,986

Positively or negatively?

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 44 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #931,006

well how many figures do you really need to remember anyway

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #931,011

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Depends on what kind of lifestyle you want to live. Choice of caviar and champagne or taco bell and pepsi.

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 48 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #931,013

well how many brands of caviar do you really need to remember

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,096

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
There is a lot to know when buying Caviar. Some great others not so much. One of the few products where price usually represents quality received.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 13 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,300

@OP
Walls of text may make people fall asleep..

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,302

@previous (F)
I wouldn't worry. You're not missing anything. What is reported is a pretty weak sauce negative correlation that only shows up when you look at the data in one particular way.

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,303

@previous (G)
ohhh...like when Trump haters try to criticize him..


got it..

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,305

@931,096 (E)

> There is a lot to know when buying Caviar. Some great others not so much. One of the few products where price usually represents quality received.

So just buy the most expensive one then, you fucking idiot.

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #931,322

@931,303 (F)
no, what a peculiar thing to bring up in a brain thread
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.