Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,212
@925,204 (A)
I only knew that they would be, because bio women don't need glory holes to get someone to suck their tits.
Actually, you probably don't need that either
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 15 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,213
> If you're already going to put a gloryhole somewhere, it would be fair and just to also put holes for tits.
But women don't use glory holes. Also wouldn't you put a hole for the vagina?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,231
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > women don't use glory holes.
Times change. They are just being marketed wrong. I think my idea would breathe new life into the concept.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,233
@previous (A)
Okay lets put together a commercial to try and sway feminine minds
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 50 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,255
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'll start. Camera is focused on a beautiful short vase filled with pale pink and off white flowers. Camera pans out to reveal a tastefully decorated restroom in the colors of blush and cream.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Omen !!gg89Kgn2v joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,258
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The door opens slowly and a pretty girl enters, glancing furtively about...
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#925,367
that whole would have to be huge hole. Whom do you think will take the time to cut it?
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#925,414
@925,407 (B)
No we need to be dead serious about this. Its for science
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#925,415
Op why aren't you participating in our commercial brainstorming?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#925,417
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think a 30 second spot may be the wrong direction to take this in. I think that a series of increasingly aggressive pamphlets and fliers may be a better place to start.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#925,419
@previous (A)
Okay so give me a rough layout of the flier. Color, paper, font and then we will figure out the script
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#925,426
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Helvetica. A truly superb font.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#926,249
Op why aren't you participating? Do you hate women or something?