Topic: Fox News Fires Contributor Who Called Kavanaugh Accusers ‘Lying Skanks’ -FIRED
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #78,908
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-fires-contributor-who-called-kavanaugh-accusers-lying-skanksJackson wrote that Ford’s “academic problems,” which she said stemmed from the alleged sexual assault, were the result of “her PROMISCUITY!” “Dang girl, stop opening your legs and OPEN A BOOK!” he wrote.
“His comments on today’s hearings were reprehensible and do not reflect the values of FOX News.” Jackson reportedly appeared on Fox News frequently as a pro-Trump voice, and guest hosted some of the network’s shows. “Lying skanks are what these 3 women are, and we ALL know more,” Jackson wrote in one tweet. In another, he remarked that “leftist women are skanky for the most part.
” He also attacked specific accusers during the Thursday hearing with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who claimed Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were both in high school. J He also targeted another Kavanaugh accuser who said the Supreme Court nominee was “present” when she was gang raped at a party, saying she “wasn’t at these parties for the DRINKS.”
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #920,776
Just another example of radical liberals shoving political correctness down everyone's throat.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,778
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
We will have to ask becky if wealthy Fox, is a good source for a Slander lawsuit.
We will have to ask becky if wealthy Fox, is a good source for a Slander lawsuit.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,785
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,786
@previous (D)
Based on how she is being treated, she just put off the horrid pain for all those years. Can you really blame her?
Of the 60% of women who never report rapes, can you blame them?
Based on how she is being treated, she just put off the horrid pain for all those years. Can you really blame her?
Of the 60% of women who never report rapes, can you blame them?
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,788
@previous (E)
But it's amazing how it's always coming at a time when it's a government official being elected or promoted. No matter how many years later it is.
Why didn't she say anything back in 82?
Ironic don't you think?
But it's amazing how it's always coming at a time when it's a government official being elected or promoted. No matter how many years later it is.
Why didn't she say anything back in 82?
Ironic don't you think?
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,789
@previous (D)
Perhaps you missed that part of the timeline, where she only wrote the letter when he was on the short list. Not even nominated, just in consideration.
And remember she did tell her therapist several years ago.
Perhaps you missed that part of the timeline, where she only wrote the letter when he was on the short list. Not even nominated, just in consideration.
And remember she did tell her therapist several years ago.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,802
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,806
@previous (F)
I'm pretty sure that stat refers to reporting it as crime. It doesn't mean they never tell anyone.
I'm pretty sure that stat refers to reporting it as crime. It doesn't mean they never tell anyone.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,807
Soros was running Fox the whole time!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,810
@920,788 (D)
Except it's...not. From just this Congress you had Patrick Meehan, Blake Farenthold, Trent Franks, John Conyers, and Tim Murphy all resign due to allegations of sexual harassment. None of them were in a particularly unique promotion or election situation. Also why would it be surprising that when a person's name is constantly in the news, people they have harmed would start to speak out about it then? Not to mention how not seriously sexual assault was taken until basically the last 3ish years. Literally nothing about what's going on is surprising, except maybe the executive branch's inability to do their due diligence and vet this pick.
Except it's...not. From just this Congress you had Patrick Meehan, Blake Farenthold, Trent Franks, John Conyers, and Tim Murphy all resign due to allegations of sexual harassment. None of them were in a particularly unique promotion or election situation. Also why would it be surprising that when a person's name is constantly in the news, people they have harmed would start to speak out about it then? Not to mention how not seriously sexual assault was taken until basically the last 3ish years. Literally nothing about what's going on is surprising, except maybe the executive branch's inability to do their due diligence and vet this pick.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,863
Supernegro better never try and get nominated for the scotus.