Topic: The LLM, led by Kook is up 5560 points in this week's rankings.
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #78,841
The cup goes to griffyndor.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later[^] [v] #920,032
kook is just a typical conservative now tbh
The LLM lost its uniqueness years ago.
The LLM lost its uniqueness years ago.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,033
@previous (B)
I actually am not. For one thing, I am very pro abortion and think that there should be many more of them
I actually am not. For one thing, I am very pro abortion and think that there should be many more of them
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,034
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Well yeah, but you would probably want abortions for people with disabilities or for minorities or for poor people. That is just an atheistic conservative outlook.
In fact, I'd argue that it's more conservative than the Christian conservatives. Their care for the unborn has always been an odd contrast to their disdain for helping others.
Well yeah, but you would probably want abortions for people with disabilities or for minorities or for poor people. That is just an atheistic conservative outlook.
In fact, I'd argue that it's more conservative than the Christian conservatives. Their care for the unborn has always been an odd contrast to their disdain for helping others.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,035
@previous (B)
Also for unwanted children in general. Not for the poor or minorities but definitely for retards
Also for unwanted children in general. Not for the poor or minorities but definitely for retards
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,036
MRS DEBORAH JAMES joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,038
Cuckyndor
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,039
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 31 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,040
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 45 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,041
@920,038 (MRS DEBORAH JAMES)
If a Muslim immigrant assraped you, you'd probably cry later at the idea of his upcoming deportation
If a Muslim immigrant assraped you, you'd probably cry later at the idea of his upcoming deportation
Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,043
@920,039 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If they can push a key on a computer with a stick using their tongue until they die in their 20s, was it worth letting them live?
If they can push a key on a computer with a stick using their tongue until they die in their 20s, was it worth letting them live?
MRS DEBORAH JAMES replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,044
Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,045
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,046
@920,043 (F)
Do they make more than they cost to keep alive? Do they provide a specialized service that most people cannot do? Probably not
But I don't believe in killing people for being crippled after the fact. It is too late for that
Do they make more than they cost to keep alive? Do they provide a specialized service that most people cannot do? Probably not
But I don't believe in killing people for being crippled after the fact. It is too late for that
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 28 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #920,047
MRS DEBORAH JAMES replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #920,048
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #920,050
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #920,051
@920,041 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@920,047 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Now this is what I'm talking about. This is very normal conservative discourse today. The angle of homosexually and trans bashing vanished a long time ago.
@920,047 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Now this is what I'm talking about. This is very normal conservative discourse today. The angle of homosexually and trans bashing vanished a long time ago.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #920,056
cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,061
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,063
@920,056 (G)
> All that's needed now is a politically timed rape accusation from the democrats!
get a better hobby
> All that's needed now is a politically timed rape accusation from the democrats!
get a better hobby
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,073
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,075
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #920,130
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 months later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,259
bump
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,267
@OP
> The cup goes to griffyndor
@920,130 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm actually curious what house you are. Granted it means about about as much as any other label anyone has given you in this thread. But do you have a house?
I'm Ravenclaw if you really want to know. Don't get all excited like it means anything.
> The cup goes to griffyndor
@920,130 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm actually curious what house you are. Granted it means about about as much as any other label anyone has given you in this thread. But do you have a house?
I'm Ravenclaw if you really want to know. Don't get all excited like it means anything.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,288
fucking crazy talk..
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,290
I stand by what I said! Kook is just a conservative but without the Jesus stuff!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,291
@previous (B)
Kook is basically a nonreligious conspiracy theorist conservative with an extra helping of eugenics and racism! That's how I read her anyway.
Kook is basically a nonreligious conspiracy theorist conservative with an extra helping of eugenics and racism! That's how I read her anyway.
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,296
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,323
@previous (M)
I think instead that we should incenrovise abortions with lump payouts and possibly perks of some kind
I think instead that we should incenrovise abortions with lump payouts and possibly perks of some kind
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,325
@965,291 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes thats right
I'm not a racist Im a race realist
*blam blam blam blam!*
Yes thats right
I'm not a racist Im a race realist
*blam blam blam blam!*
Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,330
Anonymous M replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,331
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,333
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,379
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,603
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,608
@previous (O)
Because they actual living children will suffer financially because of their loose mothers
Because they actual living children will suffer financially because of their loose mothers
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,612
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,616
Anonymous O replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,635
@965,608 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There should be a HARD LIMIT on the number of kids you can have while receiving welfare then (you go past the limit, you either forfeit the extra kid or the welfare)? fuck, idk... there is no good and just way to solve these issues is there?
There should be a HARD LIMIT on the number of kids you can have while receiving welfare then (you go past the limit, you either forfeit the extra kid or the welfare)? fuck, idk... there is no good and just way to solve these issues is there?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,638
@920,034 (B)
I misread your post and thought you said "just an aesthetic conservative outlook" and I was like "wait, what" because I didn't recall eugenics being ＡＥＳＴＨＥＴＩＣ, necessarily.
I misread your post and thought you said "just an aesthetic conservative outlook" and I was like "wait, what" because I didn't recall eugenics being ＡＥＳＴＨＥＴＩＣ, necessarily.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #965,721
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Ha, you're not gonna believe this, but when I came back here, I did the same thing. I seriously wondered what I was on about, for a moment.
Ha, you're not gonna believe this, but when I came back here, I did the same thing. I seriously wondered what I was on about, for a moment.