Topic: Second woman alleges sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, this time in college, Waved Penis in her Face

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #78,800

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/second-woman-alleges-sexual-misconduct-kavanaugh-time-college-n912371

WASHINGTON — A second woman has come forward alleging sexual misconduct by embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, days before his scheduled testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in response to a previous allegation of sexual assault.

Deborah Ramirez, who attended Yale University with Kavanaugh, told The New Yorker that Kavanaugh pulled down his pants and exposed himself to her while they were classmates there.

“I remember a penis being in front of my face,” said Ramirez, who says she had been drinking. “I knew that's not what I wanted, even in that state of mind.”

She told the magazine that she pushed the person away.

“I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated,” she said. She added that she recalled Kavanaugh next to her, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.... Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’” she said. “It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’ And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.”

Edited because it goes on and on and on and on...

Poll option	Votes	Percentage
Kavanaugh is in trouble	4	50%
Kavanaugh is innocent	2	25%
LOLOLOLOLOL	2	25%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #919,620

wouldn't the world be a better place if that was the worst thing college aged kids ever did..

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,622

> and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants
Seriously? Who the fuck waves their hips back and forth they pull up their pants???

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 33 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,623

@919,620 (B)

> wouldn't the world be a better place if that was the worst thing college aged kids ever did..

yeah I guess then there wouldn't be any college aged murderers or real rapists but that's still a pretty low bar

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,627

If the hearings go on much longer more women are going to come out and make life difficult for this bad bad very bad judge.
Next some guy is going to come out and tell all about why his anus leaks.

Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,630

Also why is a frat party formal enough to address people by their full names? ''Mr. Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Ms. Debbie Ramirez's face!" He didn't have a nickname like B-dog or B Kizzle or something?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,632

Trump thinks stuff like this is a sign you’re a real man and will double down in his support.

Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,633

@previous (F)
winning..

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,635

@previous (B)
Trump always wins

Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #919,637

@919,630 (C)
well it's not at all hard to believe that there were multiple Bretts present

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,643

I have a hard time believing he would behave unethically because he worked in the Bush Administration and vigorously tried to prosecute Bill Clinton for perjury until he decided that actually once a Republican president was in office, it was impossible for a president to be criminally accountable for anything.

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,644

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> tried to prosecute Bill Clinton for perjury until he decided that actually once a Republican president was in office, it was impossible for a president to be criminally accountable for anything.

So he is just another two faced conservative.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,645

PENIS PENIS PENIS

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,646

@919,643 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You’re being intentionally deciptive or you’re just ignorant of the facts. His views on indictment of a sitting president were made public during Obama when he was a professor at Harvard Law.

https://www.businessinsider.com/brett-kavanaugh-opinions-on-impeachment-and-indictment-2018-7

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,647

You know, Clarence Thomas was outed as a horse porn viewer what, 30 years ago? That's a fuckin pioneer

there wasn't even any internet yet and the fucker knew how to get horse porn

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,650

@919,646 (F)
An intentionally deceptive Jew? The's never been the case before

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #919,655

@919,647 (Sheila LaBoof)
Honestly anyone who was an avid porn consumer and didn’t just have one or two cassettes they watched over and over had to have been a shamelessly perverted individual seeing how hard it was to even buy/watch porn before the Internet.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,665

@919,646 (F)
It was published in '09 but as he even notes there, he's building off a speech he gave in October of '08, which was informed by his prior years working as a lawyer for the Bush admin (a job he only got because he worked for Ken Starr). I don't find that so dissimilar from my glib one sentence summary as to be deceptive.

Anonymous A replied with this 7 years ago, 53 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,669

if it came out that he wanted to legalize pot you fools would trip over yourselves to endorse him..

just like Sanders..

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,670

judges don't make the laws though, that's the job of the legislative branch of government

Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,671

@919,665 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,673

@919,670 (Sheila LaBoof)
scotus judges have much power..

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,674

@919,669 (Anonymous A)
lol Sanders was jacked and people are surprised Democrats tactics are the lowest form of politics.

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,683

@919,673 (B)
to make judgements on laws that already exist

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,689

Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,694

@previous (K)

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #919,799

@919,689 (K)

>

I think you are recycling some shit from Roy Moore's defenders, seeing as supreme court judges aren't elected

Minichan