Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Kook !!a6qjFG7HF joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#918,143
Yes
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#918,145
Constitutional colorblindness is an aspect of United States Supreme Court case evaluation that began with Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. Prior to this (and for a good while afterwards), the Supreme Court considered color as a determining factor in many landmark cases. Constitutional colorblindness holds that skin color or race is virtually never a legitimate ground for legal or political distinctions, and thus, any law that is "color conscious" is presumptively unconstitutional regardless of whether its intent is to subordinate a group, or remedy discrimination. The concept, therefore, has been brought to bear both against vestiges of Jim Crow oppression, as well as remedial efforts aimed at overcoming such discrimination, such as affirmative action.
This will probably end up overturned with Trump's additions to the court over time and with ordinary attorney's, that will help by providing poor legal advice to those of color.
Omen !!gg89Kgn2v joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#918,164
@918,111 (Omen !H3Q7wZ6.SI)
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#918,199
Killing all blacks will leave becky without any clients.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#918,200