Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Can black people REALLY be described as "people"?

becky !nIGGErbOSs started this discussion 7 years ago #78,678

Thoughts?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes. 9 53%
No. 8 47%

MRS DEBORAH JAMES joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #918,110

i dont know frenology very well but apparently according to leonardo dicaprio blacks are not fully capable human beings

Omen !H3Q7wZ6.SI joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,111

In my opinion, no they can't.

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,112

shut up retard

becky !nIGGErbOSs (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,113

@previous (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
Please mind your language.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,115

Externally hosted image

becky !nIGGErbOSs (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,116

Externally hosted image

Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #918,118

Externally hosted image@previous (becky !nIGGErbOSs)

Kook !!a6qjFG7HF joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #918,143

Yes

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #918,145

Constitutional colorblindness is an aspect of United States Supreme Court case evaluation that began with Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. Prior to this (and for a good while afterwards), the Supreme Court considered color as a determining factor in many landmark cases. Constitutional colorblindness holds that skin color or race is virtually never a legitimate ground for legal or political distinctions, and thus, any law that is "color conscious" is presumptively unconstitutional regardless of whether its intent is to subordinate a group, or remedy discrimination. The concept, therefore, has been brought to bear both against vestiges of Jim Crow oppression, as well as remedial efforts aimed at overcoming such discrimination, such as affirmative action.


This will probably end up overturned with Trump's additions to the court over time and with ordinary attorney's, that will help by providing poor legal advice to those of color.

Omen !!gg89Kgn2v joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #918,164

@918,111 (Omen !H3Q7wZ6.SI)
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #918,199

Killing all blacks will leave becky without any clients.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #918,200

@918,112 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)

> shut up retard

becky !nIGGErbOSs (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #918,615

@previous (K)
Rude.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.