Topic: A Cyber sensation: World's first robotic Super model, 30 Motors Vagina yet to be fully functional
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #78,283
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/5150171/First-robot-supermodel-unveiled.htmlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIcUjcAy2Yw
HRP-4C has 30 motors in her body that allow her to walk and move her arms as well as eight motors on her face allowing her to create facial expressions such as anger and surprise. It means she can imitate the gait and pose of models
At 5ft 2in tall, the £1.4 million robot is not tall enough to be a fashion model but is instead based on the average Japanese woman.
Weighing 95lbs she even slimmed down for the event, as her predecessor weighed 128lbs.
HRP-4C helped launch Tokyo Fashion Week at the end of last month.
Designers say she has not been built with daily chores in mind as many hope robots will be able to do in the future.
She was designed to be as perfect as possible so no anus is included and her vagina currently needs a better lubrication system.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6851057/sex-robots-japan-birth-rate/
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/720731/sex-robot-doll-japan-extinct-birth-rate-web-clock-endangered-species
Sex robot TIMEBOMB: Japanese ‘will go EXTINCT as dolls beat living competition
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 35 minutes later[^] [v] #914,108
What the Fuck. That IT is packing.
IT has a pole instead of a hole.
open anus re Anal gaping just makes the Sewer pipe more bigger.
SO NO NO NO
HELL NO
IT has a pole instead of a hole.
open anus re Anal gaping just makes the Sewer pipe more bigger.
SO NO NO NO
HELL NO
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #914,109
Sex robot TIMEBOMBAnonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #914,111
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #914,114
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #914,115
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,125
those tits looks a little stiff
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,126
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,130
might be getting huge military contract someday
every fuckin war ever, the soldiers get all diseased from whores on one hand, and rape the locals on the other
every fuckin war ever, the soldiers get all diseased from whores on one hand, and rape the locals on the other
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,135
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
You suggesting that it's ok for soldiers to rape robots of the future? What if those robots are mostly male?
You suggesting that it's ok for soldiers to rape robots of the future? What if those robots are mostly male?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,138
@previous (I)
robots aren't beings. they are merely shaped that way. what if your phone was shaped like a person -- not a person
robots aren't beings. they are merely shaped that way. what if your phone was shaped like a person -- not a person
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,140
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,142
@914,138 (Sheila LaBoof)
If a phone were shaped like a person, there are a few here, who would attempt to stick penis in phone and fuck it.
If a phone were shaped like a person, there are a few here, who would attempt to stick penis in phone and fuck it.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,143
@914,135 (I)
> You suggesting that it's ok for soldiers to rape robots of the future? What if those robots are mostly male?
@914,130 (Sheila LaBoof)
> might be getting huge military contract someday
>
> every fuckin war ever, the soldiers get all diseased from whores on one hand, and rape the locals on the other
just make it so the robots can kill and fuck
> You suggesting that it's ok for soldiers to rape robots of the future? What if those robots are mostly male?
@914,130 (Sheila LaBoof)
> might be getting huge military contract someday
>
> every fuckin war ever, the soldiers get all diseased from whores on one hand, and rape the locals on the other
just make it so the robots can kill and fuck
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,145
@914,140 (J)
"ai" is a very misleading term -- there's no actual intelligence there
it's fake
they should have called it fake intelligence, or simulated intelligence
"ai" is a very misleading term -- there's no actual intelligence there
it's fake
they should have called it fake intelligence, or simulated intelligence
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #914,147
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,149
@previous (C)
right - artificial merely means that it was humanly manufactured rather than grown in nature, and thereby people wrongly infer that a thinking being is being manufactured, without inferring fakeness that they would if in other phrases for some reason
when people hear "artifical trees" they correctly infer that there are no actual trees there, but ai gets people to imagine a reality to the intelligence that is not there
compare "artificial diamonds" that really are diamonds
so the word artificial by itself doesn't convey reality versus not reality and people have to infer it from their own understanding of what is being talked about
right - artificial merely means that it was humanly manufactured rather than grown in nature, and thereby people wrongly infer that a thinking being is being manufactured, without inferring fakeness that they would if in other phrases for some reason
when people hear "artifical trees" they correctly infer that there are no actual trees there, but ai gets people to imagine a reality to the intelligence that is not there
compare "artificial diamonds" that really are diamonds
so the word artificial by itself doesn't convey reality versus not reality and people have to infer it from their own understanding of what is being talked about
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,150
@914,145 (Sheila LaBoof)
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/what-is-artificial-intelligence/518547/
Google funds a system to identify toxic comments online, a machine learning algorithm called Perspective
Coca-Cola wants to use “AI bots” to “crank out ads” instead of humans.
When the mathematician Alan Turing invented the idea of machine intelligence almost 70 years ago, he proposed that machines would be intelligent when they could trick people into thinking they were human
AI can remind creators and users of an essential truth: today’s computer systems are nothing special. They are apparatuses made by people, running software made by people, full of the feats and flaws of both
Editors note: People are full of feats and flaws of their terrible use of the brain they were born with and should be replaced by AI.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/what-is-artificial-intelligence/518547/
Google funds a system to identify toxic comments online, a machine learning algorithm called Perspective
Coca-Cola wants to use “AI bots” to “crank out ads” instead of humans.
When the mathematician Alan Turing invented the idea of machine intelligence almost 70 years ago, he proposed that machines would be intelligent when they could trick people into thinking they were human
AI can remind creators and users of an essential truth: today’s computer systems are nothing special. They are apparatuses made by people, running software made by people, full of the feats and flaws of both
Editors note: People are full of feats and flaws of their terrible use of the brain they were born with and should be replaced by AI.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,151
@previous (A)
> https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/what-is-artificial-intelligence/518547/
>
> Google funds a system to identify toxic comments online, a machine learning algorithm called Perspective
>
> Coca-Cola wants to use “AI bots” to “crank out ads” instead of humans.
>
> When the mathematician Alan Turing invented the idea of machine intelligence almost 70 years ago, he proposed that machines would be intelligent when they could trick people into thinking they were human
>
> AI can remind creators and users of an essential truth: today’s computer systems are nothing special. They are apparatuses made by people, running software made by people, full of the feats and flaws of both
>
> Editors note: People are full of feats and flaws of their terrible use of the brain they were born with and should be replaced by AI.
yeah turing was a jive turkey
I get fooled by artificial eyeballs I bet all the time -- they are not actually eyeballs regardless
> https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/what-is-artificial-intelligence/518547/
>
> Google funds a system to identify toxic comments online, a machine learning algorithm called Perspective
>
> Coca-Cola wants to use “AI bots” to “crank out ads” instead of humans.
>
> When the mathematician Alan Turing invented the idea of machine intelligence almost 70 years ago, he proposed that machines would be intelligent when they could trick people into thinking they were human
>
> AI can remind creators and users of an essential truth: today’s computer systems are nothing special. They are apparatuses made by people, running software made by people, full of the feats and flaws of both
>
> Editors note: People are full of feats and flaws of their terrible use of the brain they were born with and should be replaced by AI.
yeah turing was a jive turkey
I get fooled by artificial eyeballs I bet all the time -- they are not actually eyeballs regardless
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,154
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Just don't get fooled by a chick with a dick. Remember they are not actually females regardless.
Just don't get fooled by a chick with a dick. Remember they are not actually females regardless.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,155
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,156
@914,154 (K)
> Just don't get fooled by a chick with a dick. Remember they are not actually females regardless.
dick-obsessed
> Just don't get fooled by a chick with a dick. Remember they are not actually females regardless.
dick-obsessed
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,157
@914,145 (Sheila LaBoof)
Bro machine learning is the future
In the future you won't even be able to tell the difference between a program and a human
Bro machine learning is the future
In the future you won't even be able to tell the difference between a program and a human
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,159
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,160
I wonder what some of the slurs of the day would be
"Artificial"
"Bot"
"Sapien"
"Meat"
"Artificial"
"Bot"
"Sapien"
"Meat"
Anonymous J double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,161
@914,159 (Sheila LaBoof)
I would perform a defensive defenestration procedure to escape the danger before you got it into my beautiful lungs.
I would perform a defensive defenestration procedure to escape the danger before you got it into my beautiful lungs.
MR MIKE PENCE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,184
in what sense is she a supermodel
MR MIKE PENCE double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,185
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #914,186
@914,109 (C)
LOL'd
@914,157 (J)
> Bro machine learning is the future
Robots that smell like Axe body spray and have a bunch of Fox Racing decals all over them?
LOL'd
@914,157 (J)
> Bro machine learning is the future
Robots that smell like Axe body spray and have a bunch of Fox Racing decals all over them?