Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later[^][v]#906,375
I feel like identifying Julian Assange with Emmanuel Goldstein would just confuse and enrage the conspiracy theorists at this point. 10/10 if you can float this idea and get it to grow legs.
Meta !Sober//iZs (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 42 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^][v]#906,377
@previous (B)
Only catch is, how do I convince them I'm not a false flag sent to discredit Wikileaks?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#906,393
Julian Assange is one of those libertarians who have completely lost sight of their professed ideology, and now supports blatant authoritarians like Trump and Russia. He talks about informing the masses whilst helping men who want to strangle press freedom.
I don't really understand how these people can exist. The best explanation I've heard is that they've become convinced that liberal democracy is such a singular threat to liberty that they'll ally with anything else just to hurt it.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#906,396
He is currently looking for a new place to live.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#906,409
@906,377 (Meta !Sober//iZs) > Only catch is, how do I convince them I'm not a false flag sent to discredit Wikileaks?
If the worldwide media conspiracy wanted Wikileaks discredited, then it would be discredited. They wouldn't need you. People who say you are a shill are themselves shills peddling the status quo. Remember that anyone trying to discredit you is also proof of the conspiracy. They must be disinformation agents that are trying to silence you because you are on the right track.