Topic: turns out the guccifer "hacker" is actually 12 russians in a 400lbs fat suit sitting on a bed.
squeegee started this discussion 7 years ago #77,077
it also turns out that alt-right cucks were, again, proven 100% completely wrong despite having the actual truth shoved in their face for at least a year and a half.we told you so, you fucking idiots.
now apologize
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #903,624
I heard he is in the Gucci Gang.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,642
Typical left-winged terrorist.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,649
I can't wait till Muller and Stormy Daniels lead Cheeto Hitler out pf the white house in handcuffs ?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,656
The indictment makes many wild claims. None of which will ever have to be backed up with evidence in court.
Dems needed it to be Russians. Like really, really, badly needed it to mention some Russian person. The private contractor who examined the servers (not the FBI?) came up with 12 Russian names who together form like Voltron into a 4chan hacker who registered qooqle.com in his own name using his mom's credit card, John podesta clicked it and typed in his password (strongpassword123), which means Russians hacked the election, and that's why Hillary lost?
This won't ever go to court. The indictment is worthless.
Dems needed it to be Russians. Like really, really, badly needed it to mention some Russian person. The private contractor who examined the servers (not the FBI?) came up with 12 Russian names who together form like Voltron into a 4chan hacker who registered qooqle.com in his own name using his mom's credit card, John podesta clicked it and typed in his password (strongpassword123), which means Russians hacked the election, and that's why Hillary lost?
This won't ever go to court. The indictment is worthless.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 59 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,660
what the fuck is this guccifer I heard about lately
@previous (E)
if you are so smarty pants why are you even here
@previous (E)
if you are so smarty pants why are you even here
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,661
@903,656 (E)
Don't forget the part where Hillary's OWN FUCKING IT GUY told him to click on the password reset link because it was legitimate.
Don't forget the part where Hillary's OWN FUCKING IT GUY told him to click on the password reset link because it was legitimate.
cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,669
@903,656 (E)
> The indictment makes many wild claims. None of which will ever have to be backed up with evidence in court.
??
> The indictment makes many wild claims. None of which will ever have to be backed up with evidence in court.
??
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,756
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 53 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,770
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 31 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,774
@903,669 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court. Putin et al. might hire a lawyer to gain discovery on the DNC servers and methods used, but no one in their right mind would let that happen.
It won't go any further than indicting a ham sandwich for propaganda purposes.
They couldn't even piece together a believable indictment that takes into account information about guccifer leaked documents meta data already in the public domain in which it's clear that he was trying to seem much more Russian and left an obvious trail of Russianizing documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago...
They have also picked the timing of the indictment well, which seems to have become a theme for Mueller’s indictments in particular. This latest example comes immediately following Rosenstein and Strzok being grilled and receiving negative press as well as immediately before Trump’s summit with Putin.
Nothing will come from this, other that what has already been gained in the media.
Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court. Putin et al. might hire a lawyer to gain discovery on the DNC servers and methods used, but no one in their right mind would let that happen.
It won't go any further than indicting a ham sandwich for propaganda purposes.
They couldn't even piece together a believable indictment that takes into account information about guccifer leaked documents meta data already in the public domain in which it's clear that he was trying to seem much more Russian and left an obvious trail of Russianizing documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago...
They have also picked the timing of the indictment well, which seems to have become a theme for Mueller’s indictments in particular. This latest example comes immediately following Rosenstein and Strzok being grilled and receiving negative press as well as immediately before Trump’s summit with Putin.
Nothing will come from this, other that what has already been gained in the media.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,779
@previous (I)
> Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court. Putin et al. might hire a lawyer to gain discovery on the DNC servers and methods used, but no one in their right mind would let that happen.
>
> It won't go any further than indicting a ham sandwich for propaganda purposes.
>
> They couldn't even piece together a believable indictment that takes into account information about guccifer leaked documents meta data already in the public domain in which it's clear that he was trying to seem much more Russian and left an obvious trail of Russianizing documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago...
>
> They have also picked the timing of the indictment well, which seems to have become a theme for Mueller’s indictments in particular. This latest example comes immediately following Rosenstein and Strzok being grilled and receiving negative press as well as immediately before Trump’s summit with Putin.
>
>
> Nothing will come from this, other that what has already been gained in the media.
how come your letter keeps changing
> Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court. Putin et al. might hire a lawyer to gain discovery on the DNC servers and methods used, but no one in their right mind would let that happen.
>
> It won't go any further than indicting a ham sandwich for propaganda purposes.
>
> They couldn't even piece together a believable indictment that takes into account information about guccifer leaked documents meta data already in the public domain in which it's clear that he was trying to seem much more Russian and left an obvious trail of Russianizing documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago...
>
> They have also picked the timing of the indictment well, which seems to have become a theme for Mueller’s indictments in particular. This latest example comes immediately following Rosenstein and Strzok being grilled and receiving negative press as well as immediately before Trump’s summit with Putin.
>
>
> Nothing will come from this, other that what has already been gained in the media.
how come your letter keeps changing
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,783
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 31 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,784
some kind of spy phone
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,785
@903,774 (I)
> Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court.
I'm sure they won't, but that doesn't mean the evidence doesn't exist or won't matter.
> documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago
You seem to be indulging in weirdly dismissive speculation based on things you heard from Reddit and 4chan.
> Because 12 Russian hackers aren't going to show up to court.
I'm sure they won't, but that doesn't mean the evidence doesn't exist or won't matter.
> documents Reddit and 4chan figured out two years ago
You seem to be indulging in weirdly dismissive speculation based on things you heard from Reddit and 4chan.
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,786
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,793
@previous (I)
That site is an interesting read. I love conspiracy theories. The trouble with taking it seriously is that they hand-wave any evidence pointing at Russia away by either claiming it was planted or refusing to believe it was possible for Russia to leave a trail. Having then "debunked" the Russian option, the site just starts spinning its own narrative with very little evidence. The implication being, I assume, that if they think someone else's story doesn't make any sense, then any story they can think up must be correct.
It's easy to find support for any theory you want if you can discard the inconvenient data. Some piece of evidence is ignored for being too convenient while another piece is barely questioned. They do it with the metadata. They do it with Guccifer's claims as well - some claims are interpreted as intentional lies while others are just accepted at face value.
For something that is just a verbose way of shouting "False flag!" it was more fun to read than I thought it would be.
That site is an interesting read. I love conspiracy theories. The trouble with taking it seriously is that they hand-wave any evidence pointing at Russia away by either claiming it was planted or refusing to believe it was possible for Russia to leave a trail. Having then "debunked" the Russian option, the site just starts spinning its own narrative with very little evidence. The implication being, I assume, that if they think someone else's story doesn't make any sense, then any story they can think up must be correct.
It's easy to find support for any theory you want if you can discard the inconvenient data. Some piece of evidence is ignored for being too convenient while another piece is barely questioned. They do it with the metadata. They do it with Guccifer's claims as well - some claims are interpreted as intentional lies while others are just accepted at face value.
For something that is just a verbose way of shouting "False flag!" it was more fun to read than I thought it would be.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,860
"conspiracy theory" these days is synonymous with horseshit that the theorist himself doesn't believe but is broken enough of the heart to do mischief in society
Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,943
squeegee joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #904,131
@903,656 (E)
What about that one Russian agent chick that was just indicted? I mean, I do count Russian spies being indicted as part of Russians being indicted... don't you?
What about that one Russian agent chick that was just indicted? I mean, I do count Russian spies being indicted as part of Russians being indicted... don't you?