Topic: Robert Mueller indicts Seth Rich for leaking DNC emails
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU started this discussion 7 years ago #77,011
Actually no, wait, it was part of a wider espionage operation by at least 12 Russian Intelligence Services operatives.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
zzzuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 37 seconds later[^] [v] #903,115
Fake news
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #903,120
> Deep State swamp propaganda
Fake News ?
Fake News ?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #903,121
turns out this news is accurate
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #903,123
@903,115 (zzzuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
Want to make some quick cash? Russian agents need USA attorneys on their side.
Want to make some quick cash? Russian agents need USA attorneys on their side.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,267
This proves there was no collusion. Trump vindicated yet again.
SvetTheGreat !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,269
2018 and they still can't accept Hillary lost.
Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,271
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,299
@903,269 (SvetTheGreat !jzYkdX7lIw)
> 2018 and they still can't accept Hillary lost.
are you high again
who the fuck you imagining in your high ass head now
> 2018 and they still can't accept Hillary lost.
are you high again
who the fuck you imagining in your high ass head now
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,302
The real tragedy here is that Robert Mueller isn't using Grilli Type Super on all his documents.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #903,303
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,438
Quick question, how does the FBI know who hacked the DNC servers without ever examining them?
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,443
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,446
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,451
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,452
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,457
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,458
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,460
read what
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,470
@903,452 (J)
Nope. I charge for my English to English translation service, and I can't start giving away free samples.
Nope. I charge for my English to English translation service, and I can't start giving away free samples.
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,478
Okay I read some of it. This is about guccifer, podestas emails getting phished, and it all took place during Obama's presidency and nothing was done about it.Good on the FBI for finally doing something about it. It looks like Trump wins again!
SvetTheGreat !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,507
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,516
Do indictments have to include some sort of evidence of claims? And are indictments against people not in the country and not expected to ever show up actually just shams?
Did this really cost $60 mil?
Did this really cost $60 mil?
Anonymous J double-posted this 7 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,592
I read the whole thing eventually. Let's think about this for just one moment:
A top tier state backed group of blackhats inserted an exploit on a penetrated system with a callback address that pointed to a domain registered in their name you have got to be fucking kidding me!
No. Just no. What sort of state sponsored tradecraft is that??
Also, the idea that an examination (performed by a third party, not the FBI?) would yield the degree of specificity in this indictment is absurd. Attribution to very particular advanced cyber attackers is extremely difficult.
This whole thing feels so bogus, will never go to court, no evidence to back up any of the claims will ever be needed, some /b/tard used h4xx0r techniques most 12 year olds know not to click on, but here's the names of a dozen Russian hackers?...
This is dumb. The indictment that will never, ever, go to court.
A top tier state backed group of blackhats inserted an exploit on a penetrated system with a callback address that pointed to a domain registered in their name you have got to be fucking kidding me!
No. Just no. What sort of state sponsored tradecraft is that??
Also, the idea that an examination (performed by a third party, not the FBI?) would yield the degree of specificity in this indictment is absurd. Attribution to very particular advanced cyber attackers is extremely difficult.
This whole thing feels so bogus, will never go to court, no evidence to back up any of the claims will ever be needed, some /b/tard used h4xx0r techniques most 12 year olds know not to click on, but here's the names of a dozen Russian hackers?...
This is dumb. The indictment that will never, ever, go to court.
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,593
@previous (J)
Maybe you can write the court to tell them about how you just don't believe it. It really doesn't matter how thick you spread the personal incredulity on, the Russians aren't going to show up to court anyway.
Maybe you can write the court to tell them about how you just don't believe it. It really doesn't matter how thick you spread the personal incredulity on, the Russians aren't going to show up to court anyway.
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,595
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #903,596
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #903,699
@903,595 (J)
I'm not sure what Mueller is accomplishing by doing this, but I assume it must serve some purpose. There is certainly no shortage of speculation about the recent indictment.
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
No, that font is GrilleType Super - not to be confused with GorillaType Super commonly used in zoos.
I'm not sure what Mueller is accomplishing by doing this, but I assume it must serve some purpose. There is certainly no shortage of speculation about the recent indictment.
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
No, that font is GrilleType Super - not to be confused with GorillaType Super commonly used in zoos.