Minichan

Topic: Conservatives who say

Cicero !t8GWGziznA started this discussion 8 years ago #76,215

That you cannot changebthe Constitonal amendments.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #896,890

> changebthe Constitonal
Masters degree, my ass.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #896,891

> changebthe Constitonal amendments.
inb4syntaxoutsyouronlinedegree.

Cicero !t8GWGziznA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,893

@896,890 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Dude, I am drinking wine. Surely you can understand.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,896

@previous (Cicero !t8GWGziznA)
Shur we undirstamd. Whi woold we snot?

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 8 years ago, 0 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,897

@896,893 (Cicero !t8GWGziznA)
Yes I made typos while drunk. But modern web browsers have this neat thing where if you misspell a word it underlines it in red with a list of suggestions if you right click on it.

Also no one's forcing you to drink! You knew it was going to make you act like a total retard when you put the glass to your lips.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,898

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
His degree is in languages. Not technology lololol

Cicero !t8GWGziznA replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,907

So why not answer my actual question, instead of obsessing over typos?

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #896,908

@previous (Cicero !t8GWGziznA)
You never asked a question. You just said "Conservatives who say that you cannot changebthe Constitonal amendments".

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,939

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Maybe it's really advanced meta-humor? He's drunkposting about changing amendments so he can point out that he wouldn't be drunk if we hadn't changed some of the amendments in the first place. Perhaps Matt's humor is on a vastly higher level than we can imagine, and all his crazy shtick is just him playing four dimensional chess with all of our emotions.

Or maybe Matt is just trashed on wine like usual...

(Edited 34 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,945

@previous (G)
Hope he does not drive that photoshopped Rolls Royce while drunk.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,964

The topic is a sentence fragment. There's a subject, but what the fuck is the predicate?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,969

@896,897 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
reformed people are to be seen...and not heard..

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,974

@previous (J)
Bums like you are not to be seen, nor heard.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 45 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,981

@896,908 (Meta !Sober//iZs)

I deduce that the question is why ❔

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #896,990

@896,907 (Cicero !t8GWGziznA)

> So why not answer my actual question, instead of obsessing over typos?

idk you really half-assed this one. so. no

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #897,046

@896,939 (G)

> Maybe it's really advanced meta-humor? He's drunkposting about changing amendments so he can point out that he wouldn't be drunk if we hadn't changed some of the amendments in the first place.
He'd be even worse because he'd be brain damaged off bathtub gin mixed with antifreeze and methanol.
> Perhaps Matt's humor is on a vastly higher level than we can imagine, and all his crazy shtick is just him playing four dimensional chess with all of our emotions.
I hate reading Scott Adams blog because now I can't tell if people are retards or 4 dimensional persuasion wizards.
> Or maybe Matt is just trashed on wine like usual...
I'd like to see sober Matt. Let him dry out for a few weeks and watch him start posting recipes and original topics and making actual arguments.

Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #897,048

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Prohibition Matt would drink only the finest gin made in freestanding Perlato Roma™ porcelain bathing tubs and seasoned with a dash of wood alcohol distilled from Loire Valley oaks.

> now I can't tell if people are retards or 4 dimensional persuasion wizards
They're mostly just retards trying to pawn off their mistakes as genius. Gene Ray is the only four dimensional persuasion wizard our generation will ever see. All others are derivative.

> original topics and making actual arguments
Yeah, that would be nice to see again. We know he is capable of rational discourse when he rises above the shtick and outrage trolling.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.