Minichan

Topic: Becky, what do you think about mandatory minimum sentencing?

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 started this discussion 8 years ago #75,803

I think it is a horrible, kneejerk reaction from conservatives who love to punish others. They ruin lives in many cases, and do not take into consideration any circumstances of the crime.

beckyderp !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #893,433

Bad idea, but I also dislike laws prohibiting sending people to prison for certain circumstances (like first-time offenders). Similar reason, there needs to be discretion to look at the specifics of the offense.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,434

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,435

@893,433 (beckyderp !RwordOooFE)
Agree. I also think three stikr laws are inhuman and evil.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,436

@previous (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
Three felonies. Lock them up and throw the key away. 94% Chance that felon will commit another felony if released. The only advantage of releasing them is to keep attorney's bank accounts happy.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 50 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,437

@893,435 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
Didn’t you demand a harsher sentence for the Stanford kid who got a blowie from a drunk girl?

Do you not suppprt mandatory minimums for cases of rape or sexual assault?

Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,438

@previous (E)
For sure he is happy when pedophiles get away with it.

beckyderp !RwordOooFE replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,439

@893,437 (E)
Personally I was only thinking about mandatory minimums on drug laws... not sure why since the topic didn't say that. But for higher-level felonies where you have to prove some real evil to get the conviction I think minimums can make sense. So idk.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,440

@previous (beckyderp !RwordOooFE)
> But for higher-level felonies where you have to prove some real evil to get the conviction I think minimums can make sense. So idk.

What do you mean by you don't know. What is so hard to understand about Real Evil? Forget the fact you have to defend them no matter what cause that is how the system works but really now

beckyderp !RwordOooFE replied with this 8 years ago, 49 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,442

@previous (Syntax)
calm down man

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,445

@previous (beckyderp !RwordOooFE)
OK I calm. Clearly you wood not want to be surrounded by Real Evil except of course not that you can do anything currently about Trump

beckyderp !RwordOooFE replied with this 8 years ago, 25 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,447

@previous (Syntax)
what

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,451

@893,438 (Syntax)
You mean like 75 year old men who call 6th grade girls “eye candy” and do cocaine on a beach with toddlers?

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,454

@893,447 (beckyderp !RwordOooFE)
> Clearly you wood not want to be surrounded by Real Evil

@previous (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
Yo Pedophile do we need to ask Chili dog to remind you of what you did to her Or wood you like me to post what a Mod logged in as Mod said to you recently about your Pedophile behavior

Using a Trump style of fake news to print that filth is never ever going to work. Perhaps you need to fap over those infamous family value photos

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,458

@893,451 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
25 years of obsession Matt. 25 years.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 58 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #893,460

@893,454 (Syntax)
Indeed

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,472

@893,454 (Syntax)
Eye candy. Cocaine with toddlers.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,473

@893,434 (C)
Eye candy, Lynne.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,475

@previous (H)
Keep it to one UID Matt.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,476

@893,451 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
Post a link or get the fuck outta here, you morbidly obese piece of excrement.

Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,481

@893,472 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
Vulva pics from underage girls Matt.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #893,482

@previous (G)
Exactly

Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #893,483

@893,475 (I)
> everyone is Matt
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.