Topic: Honest question re: the failed Trump/Kim meeting in Singapore
YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 started this discussion 8 years ago #75,758
Do you honestly think that Trump could have found Singapore on a map?
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 2 | 25% | |
| No | 6 | 75% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later[^] [v] #892,898
He is your commander and chief. If you don't like it get your state to vote for someone else.
"In the decades following the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement and a concomitant reaction against cultural liberalism, the Republican Party gained strength in the conservative suburbs of New Orleans and Baton Rouge and for a time in Caddo Parish. The GOP over a long period of time drew increasing support among rural voters elsewhere, including parts of North Louisiana and Southeast Louisiana. These patterns follow trends in other southern states as white control of state Democratic Party structures weakened."
"In the decades following the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement and a concomitant reaction against cultural liberalism, the Republican Party gained strength in the conservative suburbs of New Orleans and Baton Rouge and for a time in Caddo Parish. The GOP over a long period of time drew increasing support among rural voters elsewhere, including parts of North Louisiana and Southeast Louisiana. These patterns follow trends in other southern states as white control of state Democratic Party structures weakened."
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,899
Trump pays people to geo locate Singapore.
YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 40 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,904
YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 39 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,905
@892,898 (B)
1. It is commander in chief, not commander and chief.
2. He is the commander in chief of the US armed forces, not US citizens.
1. It is commander in chief, not commander and chief.
2. He is the commander in chief of the US armed forces, not US citizens.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #892,906
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,959
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,960
@OP
I'm sure he can, but even if he can't, what does it matter? He ain't flying the plane himself.
I'm sure he can, but even if he can't, what does it matter? He ain't flying the plane himself.
