Topic: Cyber Bullying is a serious problem

The Board started this discussion 8 years ago #75,724

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued reports on cyberbullying, including "teasing, telling lies, making fun of someone, making rude or mean comments, spreading rumors, or making threatening or aggressive comments." The reports discuss how this type of "electronic aggression" leads to serious harm in the attacked person's life, including depression, alcohol abuse, and drug abuse. We have all read the reports on CNN of people who have even committed suicide directly due to cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying includes but is not limited to:

* Degradation - for example, calling a person "stupid"
* Disrespect - for example, snidely dismissing another person's posts as meaningless because they are "condescending" or "smug"
* Threats of Illegal Activity - for example, threatening to steal a person's pets or possessions
* Threats of Harm - for example, threatening to hit the person

On these forums we take the strongest stance possible against cyberbullying. These forums are absolutely 100% against cyberbullying and will take the very strictest stand possible against any person involved in this behavior, including instant bans for egregious violations. Any person deliberately violating the ban in order to continue posting will be reported to local authorities for further action.

Cyberbullying and cyberharassment are not minor issues. In Missouri, for example, cyberbullying is a Class D Felony. Other states' penalties range from jail time to $500+ penalties per incident.

If any member of our forum system ever feels any instance of cyberbullying, cyberharassment or inappropriate contact - either in an open post or in a private message - please contact a minimod immediately. We take these issues extremely seriously and will take very strong action against the instigator.

To ensure that issues of cyberbullying are caught promptly, scripts are run on schedule against the entire database system including all tables. Because we have had several bullying situations including PM messages, that does include the internal messaging system.

Additionally Users under age 13 cannot post in our forums until written consent by the parent has been sent in to Minichan Webspace LLC. Until that written consent is received, users under age 13 can only read the forums. They cannot post content.

Thanks.

(Edited 42 minutes later.)

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #892,570

> we have had several bullying situations including PM messages
????????

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,572

And how do you know if a user is under 13?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,574

> Minichan Webspace LLC
Unable to locate this LLC

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,575

> * Degradation - for example, calling a person "stupid"

Of course the person may actually be stupid. Calling them that is appropoa.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 47 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,576

@892,572 (C)
> And how do you know if a user is under 13?
A taste test.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,578

@previous (F)

> > And how do you know if a user is under 13?
> A taste test.

Pedoban

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,582

@previous (G)

No, a taste test.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,596

What about obsessively stalking people for 25 years?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #892,599

@previous (I)
What if that is keeping eyes on the perp aka pedophile.
And mods have already pointed that fact out.

Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #892,605

@892,582 (H)
Tasting kids under 13 is pedophilia. Begone, pedophile!

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,621

thats why I have to be so hard...so uppity chicks like Triptych dont bully me..

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,622

@previous (K)
Trip makes you tuck your tail between your legs and run away crying like a little bitch.

Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,628

@previous (C)
not exactly..

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,632

@previous (K)
Oh bullshit. When she turns you down, you go on a butthurt rage.

Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,633

@previous (C)
anything worth having is worth striving for..

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,638

@previous (K)
Obviously fagbert, she's told you numerous times to fuck off, but you continue stalking her.

Why is it you can't find a woman irl? Is it because of your sugarfoot?

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 40 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,652

@892,599 (J)
You mean like 75 year old men who call 6th grade girls “eye candy”?

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,653

@previous (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
No, like middle aged perverts who request "open leg vulva" from underaged girls.

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 replied with this 8 years ago, 54 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,665

@previous (M)
So, 75 year old men who call 6th grade girls “eye candy” is fine with you? That says alot about you.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,670

@previous (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)

> So, 75 year old men who call 6th grade girls “eye candy” is fine with you? That says alot about you.

But you don't deny what Anon M says? That says a lot about you.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,711

dumb post. i will hit you

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,714

@892,665 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
You and syntax are as bad as each other. Truth.

Is that want you want to hear or have you convinced yourself that you're somehow better than he is? Because you're not.

beckyderp !Memes4aSuc joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #892,731

@892,665 (YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2)
@892,670 (C)
shut up r-words