Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: If the Iran deal falls through because of Trump...
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago#75,588
... and then Iran immediately builds nukes, that's proof that it would have happened in 10 years anyway but with crazy future tech instead of modern tech.
Trump is just forcing their hand early, this will probably save billions of lives.
beckyderp !Memes4aSuc replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#891,125
@previous (B)
I very studiously avoid reading anything about the environment because I truly do not care. But thanks for the link. I will send it to Fake anon for analysis.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#891,129
@previous (beckyderp !Memes4aSuc)
It is a bunch of bs anyways. Noticed how they went from global warming to climate change? Global warming can't be proven anymore. And the climate is always changing. I need to start some NGO and rake in those leftie-funds.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#891,136
@previous (B)
Global warming actually stopped because of Trump. It turns out that Hillary's email server was warming the planet and George Soros was paying the DNC to make it look like it was carbon emissions.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^][v]#891,137
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 18 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#891,140
@891,137 (B)
Typical liberal propaganda. You just can't bear to give Trump credit for anything.
dw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,142
@891,137 (B) > But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,143
@previous (dw) > might, if, i think
According to some guy, nice job on ignoring the actual facts though. You keep surprising me with your stupidity.
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,145
@previous (B)
that study doesn't deny how much ice is melting though its just saying that at the moment there is also mass being gained, according to the nasa guy this'll last only for a few decades
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,147
@previous (dw)
The facts show Antartica has grown despite all the global warming claims heard the past few decades.
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,148
@previous (B)
the facts also show the sea level is rising
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,149
@previous (dw)
Nice change of subject. Discussing anything with you is useless because you either stop responding or change the subject.
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,150
@previous (B)
how is the sea level not related to climate change lol
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,151
@previous (dw)
It wasn't the subject was it? You dismissed the facts because some guy at NASA thinks that if this or that happens it might be reversed in 3 decades. Facts remains that Antartica is growing despite all the global warming claims.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,201
@891,150 (dw)
You guys will just have to build bigger n more better Dykes.
In my case my house will fall down do to deterioration of cliffs by Ocean a Blue waters rising
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,202
No it isn't
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,203
@891,137 (B)
"That’s despite warnings from the study’s lead author, NASA Goddard’s chief cryospheric scientist Jay Zwally, who predicted that melting would outpace increased snowfall in a decade or two."
A good article discussing that single (controversial) study, including studies that find the opposite.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,205
@891,151 (B) > some guy at NASA
But the "NASA guy" is the lead author of the paper, so you can't just dismiss him out of hand. And it's one single study, albeit one that global warming denialists latched onto.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#891,266
@previous (H)
Predictions are not facts, they took photographs and you can see it has grown. Can't get much more factual than that.