Topic: “Get that junglemonkey out of my castle!” - The Queen
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #75,516
Who knew she was a massive racist?
dw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 38 minutes later[^] [v] #890,536
island black
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #890,539
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #890,541
Meta !Sober..CPk joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #890,542
Race issues aside I think it's pretty damn WEIRD for an American to join the British royal family. I mean the whole point of America is we were done with those inbred fags.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #890,545
@previous (Meta !Sober..CPk)
I've heard more from Yank friends about the royal wedding than from Brits. Genuinely. Sometimes I think Americans care more about our royal family than we do, lol.
I've heard more from Yank friends about the royal wedding than from Brits. Genuinely. Sometimes I think Americans care more about our royal family than we do, lol.
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 48 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #890,546
@890,542 (Meta !Sober..CPk)Infiltration. Harry fills Meghan with royal jizz. Meghan produces 9 royal offspring and the rest will be history.
Possible outcome is ginger.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #890,548
@890,545 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
That damn wedding is polluting CNN currently. Apparently every reporter of CNN made the trip and it's still on CNN as if it's going to go on 4ever
That damn wedding is polluting CNN currently. Apparently every reporter of CNN made the trip and it's still on CNN as if it's going to go on 4ever
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #890,555
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #890,562
@890,548 (Syntax)
Is OJ at the wedding? Maybe they can hire Larry King back to nab an interview with their top news story of the century
Is OJ at the wedding? Maybe they can hire Larry King back to nab an interview with their top news story of the century
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,569
@890,555 (A)
Nope but I was in a relationship with a gal who used to be on their separate business channel - Never once did I visit her at work.
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
OJ cannot leave the state of Nevada while on parole - Cannot even go to New Jersey where his kids now grown up live
Nope but I was in a relationship with a gal who used to be on their separate business channel - Never once did I visit her at work.
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
OJ cannot leave the state of Nevada while on parole - Cannot even go to New Jersey where his kids now grown up live
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,570
@previous (Syntax)
LOL no matter what topic is brought up, you claim to have been personally involved!
LOL no matter what topic is brought up, you claim to have been personally involved!
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,571
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,575
@890,570 (A)
You totally dumb as all fuck. How am I personally involved in the wedding or OJ or CNN
Dating actually was much more than that - Marriage was discussed very seriously - I ended the relationship.
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Don't be putting your sexual fantasies on me bud. Betting you wood have to use a quart of goose grease to lube that old vag up.
You totally dumb as all fuck. How am I personally involved in the wedding or OJ or CNN
Dating actually was much more than that - Marriage was discussed very seriously - I ended the relationship.
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Don't be putting your sexual fantasies on me bud. Betting you wood have to use a quart of goose grease to lube that old vag up.
Meta !Sober..CPk replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,576
@890,545 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> I've heard more from Yank friends about the royal wedding than from Brits. Genuinely. Sometimes I think Americans care more about our royal family than we do, lol.
You guys live with the monarchy everyday so it's not exciting. It's something exotic for Americans. For some reason also we see everything British as "more refined" and we have this really twee image of Ye Olde Britain in our minds when we hear "England".
> I've heard more from Yank friends about the royal wedding than from Brits. Genuinely. Sometimes I think Americans care more about our royal family than we do, lol.
You guys live with the monarchy everyday so it's not exciting. It's something exotic for Americans. For some reason also we see everything British as "more refined" and we have this really twee image of Ye Olde Britain in our minds when we hear "England".
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 54 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,577
Meta !Sober..CPk replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,583
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,691
@890,542 (Meta !Sober..CPk)
Fun fact when she became the Dutchess of Sussex she had to give up her American citizenship because of the constitution.
Fun fact when she became the Dutchess of Sussex she had to give up her American citizenship because of the constitution.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,703
@previous (H)
if she wasnt a golddigger she would have called the wedding off when she found that out..
if she wasnt a golddigger she would have called the wedding off when she found that out..
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,749
@previous (I)
> if she wasnt a golddigger she would have called the wedding off when she found that out..
Turns out nobody wants to be American
> if she wasnt a golddigger she would have called the wedding off when she found that out..
Turns out nobody wants to be American
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,753
@890,691 (H)
> Fun fact when she became the Dutchess of Sussex she had to give up her American citizenship because of the constitution.
Bullllllll Shite - She is still a USA Citizen
She may choose to give it up re Tax issues if she keeps both - At this moment now married she is still USA Citizen And the Prince continues to plant his UK seed in her Oven.
> Fun fact when she became the Dutchess of Sussex she had to give up her American citizenship because of the constitution.
Bullllllll Shite - She is still a USA Citizen
She may choose to give it up re Tax issues if she keeps both - At this moment now married she is still USA Citizen And the Prince continues to plant his UK seed in her Oven.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 40 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,757
@890,545 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Only fat unloved women care, but we have more of those than the entire population of the UK, so I can understand why it seems like a lot.
Only fat unloved women care, but we have more of those than the entire population of the UK, so I can understand why it seems like a lot.
Anonymous J double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,758
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,786
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,789
@previous (H)As you may no or not no I am not Layyyyywer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_Clause
And there is this
INA § 349 states that a citizen, whether a U.S. citizen by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing certain acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality. The fact of intention is critical; it is not the mere performance of the actions mentioned in § 349.
We of course could go in2 nuts n bolts of the law but to keep this SIMPLE and use an example
Grace, Princess of Monaco, née Grace Patricia Kelly, (November 12, 1929 – September 14, 1982) was an Academy Award-winning American film actress who, upon marriage to Rainier III, Prince of Monaco on April 19 1956, became Her Serene Highness The Princess of Monaco. She was the mother of the principality's current reigning Sovereign Prince, Albert II. Princess Grace was not required to renounce her American citizenship upon her marriage.
So Meghan can be a raining Princess
Also
> foreign office
You may not be aware that Harry and Meghan have less powers re Office than Queen and Queen really has no Political Office/Powers.
King and Queens of England are now relegated to run a Disney Land type of Amusement park to attract Tourism.
(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,790
@previous (Syntax)
I apologise, I was referring to the amendment which is still pending, the titles of nobility amendment
I apologise, I was referring to the amendment which is still pending, the titles of nobility amendment
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,796
@previous (H)
Got me to looking to C what law says about US Gov forcing you to give up citizenship - Actually it is the reverse - Today if you want to give up your own citizenship it's COSTLY
$2,350
People giving up U.S. citizenship may be subject to an expatriation tax. Originally, under the Foreign Investors Tax Act of 1966, people determined to be giving up citizenship for the purpose of avoiding U.S. taxation were subject to 10 years of continued taxation on their U.S.-source income, to prevent ex-citizens from taking advantage of special tax incentives offered to foreigners investing in the United States.
This rule apparently has many problems such as
> provision is unenforceable because there is no authority for the IRS to share tax return information to enforce it.[
So congress passed a law that allows Gov to figure out what you might owe them and then they can bill you for tax's while YOU are no longer a USA Citizen
Bottom line is Meghan has to decide if her wallet will be more filled or empty and then the process is not so much so simple to give up her dual citizenship USA wise
Got me to looking to C what law says about US Gov forcing you to give up citizenship - Actually it is the reverse - Today if you want to give up your own citizenship it's COSTLY
$2,350
People giving up U.S. citizenship may be subject to an expatriation tax. Originally, under the Foreign Investors Tax Act of 1966, people determined to be giving up citizenship for the purpose of avoiding U.S. taxation were subject to 10 years of continued taxation on their U.S.-source income, to prevent ex-citizens from taking advantage of special tax incentives offered to foreigners investing in the United States.
This rule apparently has many problems such as
> provision is unenforceable because there is no authority for the IRS to share tax return information to enforce it.[
So congress passed a law that allows Gov to figure out what you might owe them and then they can bill you for tax's while YOU are no longer a USA Citizen
Bottom line is Meghan has to decide if her wallet will be more filled or empty and then the process is not so much so simple to give up her dual citizenship USA wise