Topic: Trump in 2020..
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #74,848
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later[^] [v] #885,478
Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,483
Kid Rock and Kanye West should team up to do the official campaign song ??
q. joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,487
too bad hell be sitting in prison by then.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,490
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,500
if trump is a fascist how come you can protest against him wearing pussy hats?
why aren't those protestors in jail? why aren't liberal teachers fired en masse?
why aren't liberal biased news papers and tv stations shut down?
erdogan is doing all that and more, but trump is a fascist... lol
why aren't those protestors in jail? why aren't liberal teachers fired en masse?
why aren't liberal biased news papers and tv stations shut down?
erdogan is doing all that and more, but trump is a fascist... lol
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,501
@previous (F)
Because we have checks and balances. Trump IS a fascist, and if he had no restraints, he WOULD do all those things. Example: Trump said, “Let’s take the guns now and worry about due process later.”
Because we have checks and balances. Trump IS a fascist, and if he had no restraints, he WOULD do all those things. Example: Trump said, “Let’s take the guns now and worry about due process later.”
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #885,503
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
just out of curiosity, what exactly is it what he did or does that makes him a fascist?
some examples would be great
just out of curiosity, what exactly is it what he did or does that makes him a fascist?
some examples would be great
q. replied with this 8 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #885,530
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,569
dw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,572
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,574
@previous (dw)
No. I like Trump and think he will probably win again in 2020. Not because he is so good, but because the Dems and their platform is so bad.
No. I like Trump and think he will probably win again in 2020. Not because he is so good, but because the Dems and their platform is so bad.
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,577
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,580
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,582
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,584
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 38 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,587
@885,501 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Reported for fraudulently using the Big Daddy Derek moniker. The Big Daddies Derek aren't cucks and support the white man's President.
Reported for fraudulently using the Big Daddy Derek moniker. The Big Daddies Derek aren't cucks and support the white man's President.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,588
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,618
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 47 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,644
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 39 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,650
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,657
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,714
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
don't you want free healthcare?
don't you want reasonable immigration laws?
don't you want everybody to be allowed to be in the military if they so choose?
don't you want some dude who doesn't announce policy over twitter before even his own administration knows about it?
don't you want free healthcare?
don't you want reasonable immigration laws?
don't you want everybody to be allowed to be in the military if they so choose?
don't you want some dude who doesn't announce policy over twitter before even his own administration knows about it?
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,720
@previous (dw)
everything is better than a woman who destroys (subpoenaed) evidence
there's no such thing as free healthcare, doctors need to get paid
legal immigration is very reasonable, whats wrong with the current immigrations laws in the us?
shouldnt the military decide who is fit for duty and who's not?
let him announce anything he wants, its always better than sending pallets of cash to iran
everything is better than a woman who destroys (subpoenaed) evidence
there's no such thing as free healthcare, doctors need to get paid
legal immigration is very reasonable, whats wrong with the current immigrations laws in the us?
shouldnt the military decide who is fit for duty and who's not?
let him announce anything he wants, its always better than sending pallets of cash to iran
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,724
@previous (F)
> everything is better than a woman who destroys (subpoenaed) evidence
> there's no such thing as free healthcare, doctors need to get paid
yes by the state from taxes on the rich
> legal immigration is very reasonable, whats wrong with the current immigrations laws in the us?
well he did ban 7 nations based on seemingly nothing more than some vaguely racist guesswork
> shouldnt the military decide who is fit for duty and who's not?
yes not trump
> let him announce anything he wants, its always better than sending pallets of cash to iran
the white house administration seems to disagree
> everything is better than a woman who destroys (subpoenaed) evidence
> there's no such thing as free healthcare, doctors need to get paid
yes by the state from taxes on the rich
> legal immigration is very reasonable, whats wrong with the current immigrations laws in the us?
well he did ban 7 nations based on seemingly nothing more than some vaguely racist guesswork
> shouldnt the military decide who is fit for duty and who's not?
yes not trump
> let him announce anything he wants, its always better than sending pallets of cash to iran
the white house administration seems to disagree
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,725
@previous (dw)
how do you make sure poor people don't contribute to it, and how fair is that on rich people?
muslim are a race?
who and what is the commander in chief?
let them, they're not the president are they?
how do you make sure poor people don't contribute to it, and how fair is that on rich people?
muslim are a race?
who and what is the commander in chief?
let them, they're not the president are they?
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,730
@@previous (F)
> how do you make sure poor people don't contribute to it, and how fair is that on rich people?
from each according to his ability etc
> muslim are a race?
islam is a religion
> who and what is the commander in chief?
someone who doesnt know enough about the military to ban people from joining it lol
> let them, they're not the president are they?
no but they do have to do his job
> how do you make sure poor people don't contribute to it, and how fair is that on rich people?
from each according to his ability etc
> muslim are a race?
islam is a religion
> who and what is the commander in chief?
someone who doesnt know enough about the military to ban people from joining it lol
> let them, they're not the president are they?
no but they do have to do his job
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,734
@previous (dw)
you mean socialism?
you can't be racist towards a religion
didn't answer the question
citation needed
you mean socialism?
you can't be racist towards a religion
didn't answer the question
citation needed
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 51 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,736
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,738
@885,734 (F)
> you mean socialism?
socialized healthcare yes
> you can't be racist towards a religion
you can be racist towards brown people
> didn't answer the question
yes i did?
> citation needed
every president relies heavily upon staff to do their jobs lol its in their best interest to keep the staff happy
> you mean socialism?
socialized healthcare yes
> you can't be racist towards a religion
you can be racist towards brown people
> didn't answer the question
yes i did?
> citation needed
every president relies heavily upon staff to do their jobs lol its in their best interest to keep the staff happy
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,739
@previous (dw)
got any success stories of socialist healthcare?
circular argument but ok; muslims aren't a race they come in all colours
no you didn't, what is the commander in chief?
you're implying all the staff is unhappy with trump tweeting, there is no way of knowing that
there could be more staffers happy with his tweets than unhappy, we simply do not know
got any success stories of socialist healthcare?
circular argument but ok; muslims aren't a race they come in all colours
no you didn't, what is the commander in chief?
you're implying all the staff is unhappy with trump tweeting, there is no way of knowing that
there could be more staffers happy with his tweets than unhappy, we simply do not know
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,740
@previous (F)> got any success stories of socialist healthcare?
see pic
> circular argument but ok; muslims aren't a race they come in all colours
he banned countries not religions
> no you didn't, what is the commander in chief
trump
> you're implying all the staff is unhappy with trump tweeting, there is no way of knowing that
> there could be more staffers happy with his tweets than unhappy, we simply do not know
it seems to be a common feeling among the staff based on the available information
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,742
@previous (dw)
in none of those countries the poor have free healthcare as their tax payments also contributes to it and in some cases there's enforced insurance
you can't be racist towards countries, you can only be racist when you take skin colour into account, please look up what racism actually is
thats who not what, please try again, i suggest reading up on what the commender in chief is
a common feeling based on available information, can you be any more vague? link to some of that information?
in none of those countries the poor have free healthcare as their tax payments also contributes to it and in some cases there's enforced insurance
you can't be racist towards countries, you can only be racist when you take skin colour into account, please look up what racism actually is
thats who not what, please try again, i suggest reading up on what the commender in chief is
a common feeling based on available information, can you be any more vague? link to some of that information?
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,743
What is a commender in chief?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #885,744
@previous (K)
If only syntax was here to copypaste 1000 words from a Wikipedia article he didn't read...
If only syntax was here to copypaste 1000 words from a Wikipedia article he didn't read...
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,845
@885,714 (dw)
First of all, none of that is related to your comment. None.
As for healthcare, I've heard of the wait times in countries with socialized medicine and they worry me. I like being able to be treated for health problems without having to wait months. Though I do think that we should make Healthcare more accessible to the poor.
Regarding immigration, I feel as though we should comb wanting countries and pick the best and brightest and allow them and their families (including patents) to legally immigrate. I don't agree with shipping thousands of uneducated Muslim males into this country.
Regarding military, I believe gender dysphoria is a mental illness. If we allow people with such a condition, than we should allow people with other mental illnesses.
First of all, none of that is related to your comment. None.
As for healthcare, I've heard of the wait times in countries with socialized medicine and they worry me. I like being able to be treated for health problems without having to wait months. Though I do think that we should make Healthcare more accessible to the poor.
Regarding immigration, I feel as though we should comb wanting countries and pick the best and brightest and allow them and their families (including patents) to legally immigrate. I don't agree with shipping thousands of uneducated Muslim males into this country.
Regarding military, I believe gender dysphoria is a mental illness. If we allow people with such a condition, than we should allow people with other mental illnesses.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,847
@885,740 (dw)
The countries that he banned didnt contain all of the same races did they? Chad, Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea all have different majority races.
The countries that he banned didnt contain all of the same races did they? Chad, Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea all have different majority races.
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,882
@885,845 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> Regarding military, I believe gender dysphoria is a mental illness. If we allow people with such a condition, than we should allow people with other mental illnesses.
I feel like you're not trolling, but it's hard to believe you looked at that sentence and thought that was a rational thing to say.
> Regarding military, I believe gender dysphoria is a mental illness. If we allow people with such a condition, than we should allow people with other mental illnesses.
I feel like you're not trolling, but it's hard to believe you looked at that sentence and thought that was a rational thing to say.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,885
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,887
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,888
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,889
@previous (I)
Educated people could have an honest discussion about whether it is or isn't a mental illness. That's not really what worries me. It's the logic going on where kook states that she believes it's a mental illness, proceeds to lump all mental illnesses together, and then tries to reach a conclusion about false equivalences based on her belief... and then thinks sounds like a rational thing to do.
Educated people could have an honest discussion about whether it is or isn't a mental illness. That's not really what worries me. It's the logic going on where kook states that she believes it's a mental illness, proceeds to lump all mental illnesses together, and then tries to reach a conclusion about false equivalences based on her belief... and then thinks sounds like a rational thing to do.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,890
@885,887 (K)
From what I've been told, gender dysphoria is a near debilitating condition that results in panic attacks, extreme depression, ptsd, and even episodes of disassociation and depersonalization. And is something that hormone therapy (when even available) barely touches. So why wouldn't I consider it to be a mental illness?
From what I've been told, gender dysphoria is a near debilitating condition that results in panic attacks, extreme depression, ptsd, and even episodes of disassociation and depersonalization. And is something that hormone therapy (when even available) barely touches. So why wouldn't I consider it to be a mental illness?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,892
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 triple-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,893
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Or look at it this way. Find the mental illnesses that exclude people from serving and compare quality of life factors between them. Such as mortality rates, drug use etc
Or look at it this way. Find the mental illnesses that exclude people from serving and compare quality of life factors between them. Such as mortality rates, drug use etc
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,894
@885,890 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> From what I've been told, gender dysphoria is a near debilitating condition that results in panic attacks, extreme depression, ptsd, and even episodes of disassociation and depersonalization.
It's a mental illness thats result in other mental illnesses! I've known trans people who didn't have all those things. I feel like you're painting with a broad brush to make your point.
Honestly, I don't care if you think it is a mental illness or not. The problem that really stands out is lumping all mental illness into one big category and acting like that makes a point.
> From what I've been told, gender dysphoria is a near debilitating condition that results in panic attacks, extreme depression, ptsd, and even episodes of disassociation and depersonalization.
It's a mental illness thats result in other mental illnesses! I've known trans people who didn't have all those things. I feel like you're painting with a broad brush to make your point.
Honestly, I don't care if you think it is a mental illness or not. The problem that really stands out is lumping all mental illness into one big category and acting like that makes a point.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,895
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,896
@885,894 (K)
What were their symptoms? Because from what I've been told, gender dysphoria makes it nearly impossible to function in society, especially without medications
Even ADHD puts severe restrictions on enlisting. So why doesnt a condition that requires appearance altering medication and modified language use in order for a person to thrive, also see the same scrutiny?
What were their symptoms? Because from what I've been told, gender dysphoria makes it nearly impossible to function in society, especially without medications
Even ADHD puts severe restrictions on enlisting. So why doesnt a condition that requires appearance altering medication and modified language use in order for a person to thrive, also see the same scrutiny?
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,897
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> gender dysphoria makes it nearly impossible to function in society
Oh, that's why I never see or hear about any trans people. We better make sure to be on guard just in case any of these people manage to overcome their crippling condition and get the courage to leave their homes one day and slip down to a recruiting office.
> Even ADHD puts severe restrictions on enlisting. So why doesnt a condition that requires appearance altering medication and modified language use in order for a person to thrive, also see the same scrutiny?
I don't think anyone is not advocating scrutiny, but scrutiny isn't the same thing as a ban.
> gender dysphoria makes it nearly impossible to function in society
Oh, that's why I never see or hear about any trans people. We better make sure to be on guard just in case any of these people manage to overcome their crippling condition and get the courage to leave their homes one day and slip down to a recruiting office.
> Even ADHD puts severe restrictions on enlisting. So why doesnt a condition that requires appearance altering medication and modified language use in order for a person to thrive, also see the same scrutiny?
I don't think anyone is not advocating scrutiny, but scrutiny isn't the same thing as a ban.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,899
@previous (K)
We hear about trans people who are on heavy medication and require the use of modified pronouns in order to function. Many are jobless ot homeless with seemingly the most popular occupation being sex work. And the way they talk about it seems debilitating to me. I'll die without this surgery, I had a panic attack when he called me a man.
This second part I agree with you, but I believe that all mental illnesses require review instead of any outright bans.
We hear about trans people who are on heavy medication and require the use of modified pronouns in order to function. Many are jobless ot homeless with seemingly the most popular occupation being sex work. And the way they talk about it seems debilitating to me. I'll die without this surgery, I had a panic attack when he called me a man.
This second part I agree with you, but I believe that all mental illnesses require review instead of any outright bans.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,900
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,901
@885,899 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> We hear about trans people who are on heavy medication and require the use of modified pronouns in order to function. Many are jobless ot homeless with seemingly the most popular occupation being sex work. And the way they talk about it seems debilitating to me. I'll die without this surgery, I had a panic attack when he called me a man
*Starts a slow clap*
Well done kook, truth.
> We hear about trans people who are on heavy medication and require the use of modified pronouns in order to function. Many are jobless ot homeless with seemingly the most popular occupation being sex work. And the way they talk about it seems debilitating to me. I'll die without this surgery, I had a panic attack when he called me a man
*Starts a slow clap*
Well done kook, truth.
Anonymous N replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,902
@885,899 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Even is being trans wasn't enough to exclude someone from military service, the co-morbid conditions would exclude them.
reminder: anyone with any paraphilia is excluded from service, so you sick fucks can never be drafted.
Even is being trans wasn't enough to exclude someone from military service, the co-morbid conditions would exclude them.
reminder: anyone with any paraphilia is excluded from service, so you sick fucks can never be drafted.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,903
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,904
@885,899 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> I believe that all mental illnesses require review instead of any outright bans.
That sounds pretty rational to me too. It just sounded like you were lumping ADHD and gender dysphoria and paranoid schizophrenia all into the same category there. There are plenty of functional people with what you could call mental illnesses, and they aren't all suffering the same thing. I feel like anyone entering the military should be evaluated on the basis of whether they personally can do what is being asked of them, not on an assumption based on a broad label.
> I believe that all mental illnesses require review instead of any outright bans.
That sounds pretty rational to me too. It just sounded like you were lumping ADHD and gender dysphoria and paranoid schizophrenia all into the same category there. There are plenty of functional people with what you could call mental illnesses, and they aren't all suffering the same thing. I feel like anyone entering the military should be evaluated on the basis of whether they personally can do what is being asked of them, not on an assumption based on a broad label.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,905
@previous (K)
I kind of understand why they dont do it individually though. Its all about risk assessment.
I kind of understand why they dont do it individually though. Its all about risk assessment.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,907
@885,902 (N)
I just have a hard time reconciling the concepts of one group having what is portrayed as having the least stable, worst existence possible, with being trusted to protect the American people.
I just have a hard time reconciling the concepts of one group having what is portrayed as having the least stable, worst existence possible, with being trusted to protect the American people.
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,911
@885,905 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Well, things like depression, anxiety, or ADHD seem to work on a sliding scale where there are criteria that would disqualify you, but just having a history of that diagnosis isn't enough to keep you out. Particularly since every other kid seemed to be diagnosed as ADHD there for while. They seem to recognize that there are gray areas and individuals can be assessed on the basis of their particular symptoms. I haven't seen anything indicating Trump's ideas about transgender people in the military came from a detailed risk assessment.
Well, things like depression, anxiety, or ADHD seem to work on a sliding scale where there are criteria that would disqualify you, but just having a history of that diagnosis isn't enough to keep you out. Particularly since every other kid seemed to be diagnosed as ADHD there for while. They seem to recognize that there are gray areas and individuals can be assessed on the basis of their particular symptoms. I haven't seen anything indicating Trump's ideas about transgender people in the military came from a detailed risk assessment.
Anonymous N replied with this 8 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,912
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,914
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,917
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I haven't seen anything that would make me think so. Do you think there was a connection?
I haven't seen anything that would make me think so. Do you think there was a connection?
Anonymous N replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,918
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,922
@885,917 (K)
I dont know why it popped into my head. I just can't think of why this issue came out at this particular time.
I dont know why it popped into my head. I just can't think of why this issue came out at this particular time.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,923
@885,918 (N)
That dude punched a woman in the face while he was enlisted as a man and blamed it on lesbian drama. Fuck him.
That dude punched a woman in the face while he was enlisted as a man and blamed it on lesbian drama. Fuck him.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,924
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,926
@previous (A)
First of all if you punch someone when they haven't touched you, you are probably an ass
Secondly punching a superior officer while in the military is a big no no
Last of all the reason that he said (and bragged) about hitting her was that dykes are dramatic.
He is a piece of shit, propped up by the left as a rolemodel
He will likely make a great politician
First of all if you punch someone when they haven't touched you, you are probably an ass
Secondly punching a superior officer while in the military is a big no no
Last of all the reason that he said (and bragged) about hitting her was that dykes are dramatic.
He is a piece of shit, propped up by the left as a rolemodel
He will likely make a great politician
Anonymous N replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,929
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
She also destroyed a computer and trashed an office when they told her she was lazy and wouldn't be getting any more days off.
She also destroyed a computer and trashed an office when they told her she was lazy and wouldn't be getting any more days off.
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,934
@885,926 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> propped up by the left as a rolemodel
Eh... Probably not. There were plenty of people on "the left" who spoke out about her being unfit to run for a Maryland seat in the US Senate. The US left's reception to her has been mixed at best.
Her campaign is interesting. She's like what you'd get if Ron Paul were a progressive. She seems to appeal to a small segment of anti-establishment, small-government people.
> propped up by the left as a rolemodel
Eh... Probably not. There were plenty of people on "the left" who spoke out about her being unfit to run for a Maryland seat in the US Senate. The US left's reception to her has been mixed at best.
Her campaign is interesting. She's like what you'd get if Ron Paul were a progressive. She seems to appeal to a small segment of anti-establishment, small-government people.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,979
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #885,980
@885,934 (K)
Its not really relevant, but his use of emoji really bothers me. And I have seen him get a lot of support from the lgbt crowd
Its not really relevant, but his use of emoji really bothers me. And I have seen him get a lot of support from the lgbt crowd
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,049
@885,742 (F)
> in none of those countries the poor have free healthcare as their tax payments also contributes to it
incorrect
I do not pay any taxes because I do not make enough money to do so
> in none of those countries the poor have free healthcare as their tax payments also contributes to it
incorrect
I do not pay any taxes because I do not make enough money to do so
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,053
@885,926 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I also have not seen anyone support chelsea manning as a human being
like
you can validate someone's identity without that having any effect on your assessment of them as a person
donald trump is a piece of shit but I won't make fun of his appearance to support that
etc
I also have not seen anyone support chelsea manning as a human being
like
you can validate someone's identity without that having any effect on your assessment of them as a person
donald trump is a piece of shit but I won't make fun of his appearance to support that
etc
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,068
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Why would I validate someone that I don't like or dont trust? Any time that I use someones correct pronouns, its because I like them as a person and want them to be comfortable. Not because I see them as their preferred gender.
If you want to see support for Manning, look on twitter, tumblr, and reddit.
As a Canadian, you dont necessarily know the views of Americans.
Why would I validate someone that I don't like or dont trust? Any time that I use someones correct pronouns, its because I like them as a person and want them to be comfortable. Not because I see them as their preferred gender.
If you want to see support for Manning, look on twitter, tumblr, and reddit.
As a Canadian, you dont necessarily know the views of Americans.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,079
Like Floyd mayweather says. If you are talking about me.. I am making money. Hence more famous.
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,163
@886,049 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
implying you're not paying taxes on smokes, food or any other items you buy
implying you're not paying taxes on smokes, food or any other items you buy
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,164
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,165
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
how do they know how much vat/tax you paid on groceries, clothes and smokes?
do they guess or do you submit receipts?
either way, i don't see canada on the image i responded to, i only see european countries
and no way you can get rebates for vat/taxes on things like groceries and smoking in those
how do they know how much vat/tax you paid on groceries, clothes and smokes?
do they guess or do you submit receipts?
either way, i don't see canada on the image i responded to, i only see european countries
and no way you can get rebates for vat/taxes on things like groceries and smoking in those
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,169
@previous (F)
theres no tax on food unless it is pre prepared
they just guess, it's $80 every 3 months
theres no tax on food unless it is pre prepared
they just guess, it's $80 every 3 months
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,170
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
This boxcar hobo subsidy seems excessive. How often do you spend that $80 on drugs?
This boxcar hobo subsidy seems excessive. How often do you spend that $80 on drugs?
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,175
@886,169 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
i don't know the vat/tax rates but $80 seems very little for 3 months of groceries and clothes and whatever else you need
even you end up paying some taxes in the form of vat on stuff you buy, the 80$ rebate won't cover it all
no free healthcare for you, it doesn't exist its a pipe dream, in the end someone has to pay for it
and unless you pay 0 taxes which is pretty much impossible you and poor people always contribute to healthcare
i don't know the vat/tax rates but $80 seems very little for 3 months of groceries and clothes and whatever else you need
even you end up paying some taxes in the form of vat on stuff you buy, the 80$ rebate won't cover it all
no free healthcare for you, it doesn't exist its a pipe dream, in the end someone has to pay for it
and unless you pay 0 taxes which is pretty much impossible you and poor people always contribute to healthcare
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,184
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,188
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
that doesn't negate the fact you pay taxes on other things
your post (@886,049 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)) is incorrect not my statements, we all pay taxes including poor people
death and taxes are the only sure things in life
that doesn't negate the fact you pay taxes on other things
your post (@886,049 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)) is incorrect not my statements, we all pay taxes including poor people
death and taxes are the only sure things in life
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,191
@previous (F)
You get services for the taxes you pay though..
It's not like your giving up your hard earned money for nothing..
You get services for the taxes you pay though..
It's not like your giving up your hard earned money for nothing..
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,193
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,199
@886,188 (F)
yeah I'm just thinking that $80 every 3 months as a rebate for a 10% tax means spending $800 over three months on taxed goods (which again groceries are not)
that seems reasonable
yeah I'm just thinking that $80 every 3 months as a rebate for a 10% tax means spending $800 over three months on taxed goods (which again groceries are not)
that seems reasonable
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,200
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,208
North Korea has just moved three Korean Americans from a hard labor camp, is likely to release them.
Quote: planned meeting between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, and an unprecedented thaw in the relationship between North and South Koreas, Pyongyang decided to release the three Korean-Americans detained in the country's labor camps Tuesday.
Choi Sung-ryong, a representative of the families of the prisoners, told South Korean news outlet Naver: "We talked with a source in North Korea today. North Korean authorities released Kim Dong-cheol, Kim Sang-deok and Kim Hak-seong, who were in jail at the labor correction center in early April, and they are currently in a ‘course’ where they are treated and educated at a hotel outside Pyongyang.”
Choi added that the source revealed North Korea was negotiating with the United States about the best way to get the detainees back home. One of the ways involved was releasing them back on the day of the Trump-Kim summit, although no specific date has been finalized yet for the meeting.
Newly appointed National Security Advisor John Bolton told Fox News on Sunday: "If North Korea releases the detained Americans before the North-US summit, it will be an opportunity to demonstrate their authenticity."
Dong-chul is a South Korea-born American pastor who was arrested and detained by North Korea in 2015 on the charge of spying. He was sentenced to 10 years hard labor in 2016. Hak-song and Sang-duk were both working at the Pyongyang University of Science and Technology, when they were detained last year on suspicion of "hostile acts."
After being released from the labor camp, the three men were undergoing “ideological education such as receiving health treatment” because they were believed to have “deteriorated” during their imprisonment.
According to report, North Korea was being extra-careful about prisoners being given proper healthcare because they did not want to repeat what happened with 22-year-old American university student Otto Warmbier from Ohio, who was imprisoned by Pyongyang in January 2016 and returned to the United States in June 2017 in a coma. He died shortly after.
Otto’s parents, Fred and Cindy Warmbier, claimed their son had been "brutally tortured and murdered" and sued North Korea for wrongful death.
"Otto was taken hostage, kept as a prisoner for political purposes, used as a pawn and singled out for exceptionally harsh and brutal treatment by Kim Jong Un,” Fred said in a press conference, a day before the North Korean leader was supposed to meet with his Southern counterpart Moon Jae-in for the first time.
North Korea has, however, dismissed torture claims and blamed botulism and ingestion of a sleeping pill as the cause for Otto’s death. At the same time, it was reported that the release of the detainees was supposed to be a show of good faith on Pyongyang’s behalf – an impact that will not be effective if the prisoners end up meeting the same fate as Otto.
After newly appointed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo held a secret meeting with the North Korean leader over the Easter weekend, where they discussed the release of the three American detainees, a senior White House official told Associated Press that the president believed that “there’s a good chance” the trio would be released
Quote: planned meeting between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, and an unprecedented thaw in the relationship between North and South Koreas, Pyongyang decided to release the three Korean-Americans detained in the country's labor camps Tuesday.
Choi Sung-ryong, a representative of the families of the prisoners, told South Korean news outlet Naver: "We talked with a source in North Korea today. North Korean authorities released Kim Dong-cheol, Kim Sang-deok and Kim Hak-seong, who were in jail at the labor correction center in early April, and they are currently in a ‘course’ where they are treated and educated at a hotel outside Pyongyang.”
Choi added that the source revealed North Korea was negotiating with the United States about the best way to get the detainees back home. One of the ways involved was releasing them back on the day of the Trump-Kim summit, although no specific date has been finalized yet for the meeting.
Newly appointed National Security Advisor John Bolton told Fox News on Sunday: "If North Korea releases the detained Americans before the North-US summit, it will be an opportunity to demonstrate their authenticity."
Dong-chul is a South Korea-born American pastor who was arrested and detained by North Korea in 2015 on the charge of spying. He was sentenced to 10 years hard labor in 2016. Hak-song and Sang-duk were both working at the Pyongyang University of Science and Technology, when they were detained last year on suspicion of "hostile acts."
After being released from the labor camp, the three men were undergoing “ideological education such as receiving health treatment” because they were believed to have “deteriorated” during their imprisonment.
According to report, North Korea was being extra-careful about prisoners being given proper healthcare because they did not want to repeat what happened with 22-year-old American university student Otto Warmbier from Ohio, who was imprisoned by Pyongyang in January 2016 and returned to the United States in June 2017 in a coma. He died shortly after.
Otto’s parents, Fred and Cindy Warmbier, claimed their son had been "brutally tortured and murdered" and sued North Korea for wrongful death.
"Otto was taken hostage, kept as a prisoner for political purposes, used as a pawn and singled out for exceptionally harsh and brutal treatment by Kim Jong Un,” Fred said in a press conference, a day before the North Korean leader was supposed to meet with his Southern counterpart Moon Jae-in for the first time.
North Korea has, however, dismissed torture claims and blamed botulism and ingestion of a sleeping pill as the cause for Otto’s death. At the same time, it was reported that the release of the detainees was supposed to be a show of good faith on Pyongyang’s behalf – an impact that will not be effective if the prisoners end up meeting the same fate as Otto.
After newly appointed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo held a secret meeting with the North Korean leader over the Easter weekend, where they discussed the release of the three American detainees, a senior White House official told Associated Press that the president believed that “there’s a good chance” the trio would be released
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,226
From info on wiki:
According to the testimony of former camp guard Ahn Myong Chol of Camp 22, the guards are trained to treat the detainees as sub-human, and he gave an account of children in one of the camps who were fighting over who got to eat a kernel of corn retrieved from cow dung.
According to the testimony of former camp guard Ahn Myong Chol of Camp 22, the guards are trained to treat the detainees as sub-human, and he gave an account of children in one of the camps who were fighting over who got to eat a kernel of corn retrieved from cow dung.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,246
@886,200 (F)
just that it sounds to me as if I do get a refund of all sales tax I pay based on those numbers
and since I do not pay income tax it does seem as if I pay no taxes
just that it sounds to me as if I do get a refund of all sales tax I pay based on those numbers
and since I do not pay income tax it does seem as if I pay no taxes
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,258
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Idk why he is so hung up on the idea of contributing to healthcare anyway.
Idk why he is so hung up on the idea of contributing to healthcare anyway.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,259
Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 46 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,263
Anonymous N replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,265
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,268
@886,263 (Meta)
I get a direct deposit or cheque depending on settings of appx $79 every 3 months that are labeled gst rebate from the government of Canada
@previous (N)
There are certain credits you get for making less than a certain income and random shit like living alone or renting
not sure if the cut off is the same for all but I do know they don't ask for income tax if you make less than &11k a year
Which doesn't include loans
@previous (N)
I'm a student ofc I'm fiscally useless
I get a direct deposit or cheque depending on settings of appx $79 every 3 months that are labeled gst rebate from the government of Canada
@previous (N)
There are certain credits you get for making less than a certain income and random shit like living alone or renting
not sure if the cut off is the same for all but I do know they don't ask for income tax if you make less than &11k a year
Which doesn't include loans
@previous (N)
I'm a student ofc I'm fiscally useless
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,296
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,313
Oh goddamn...thus us some bullshit.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 8 years ago, 51 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,314
I am the King..
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 8 years ago, 45 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,315
Say my name..
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,344
@886,246 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> seems
feelings are not arguments or facts, nothing in my post was incorrect
you just like dw contribute to healthcare by paying taxes on stuff you buy
there's no country in the world were poor people live tax free
@886,258 (R)
you'd know if you'd read the preceding posts
> seems
feelings are not arguments or facts, nothing in my post was incorrect
you just like dw contribute to healthcare by paying taxes on stuff you buy
there's no country in the world were poor people live tax free
@886,258 (R)
you'd know if you'd read the preceding posts
Anonymous R replied with this 8 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,490
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 14 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,675
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 18 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,804
@886,344 (F)
$80 over 3 months for 10% sales tax
that's $800 spent on taxed goods every 3 months
which is $267 on taxed goods every month
i do not buy many taxed goods and groceries are not taxed
and i don't pay income tax
so no i do not pay taxes
$80 over 3 months for 10% sales tax
that's $800 spent on taxed goods every 3 months
which is $267 on taxed goods every month
i do not buy many taxed goods and groceries are not taxed
and i don't pay income tax
so no i do not pay taxes
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 36 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,809
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)that only holds true if you don't spend more than $800 every 3 months on stuff with 10% tax
guess you never buy clothes or a new phone or computer, besides a personal experience is not an argument
nothing in my post you felt the need to call incorrect was actually incorrect
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,810
@previous (F)
I usually get clothes (most things really) from people not stores, and many are free or trades
How often do you get a new phone or computer? I got this phone for free
I don't spend more than $800 every 3 months on taxed goods or services
all I'm saying is that I in effect pay no taxes and therefore don't actually pay for my health care
I usually get clothes (most things really) from people not stores, and many are free or trades
How often do you get a new phone or computer? I got this phone for free
I don't spend more than $800 every 3 months on taxed goods or services
all I'm saying is that I in effect pay no taxes and therefore don't actually pay for my health care
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,812
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
thats great, doesn't negate the fact you're most likely an exception not the rule
therefore nothing i have posted was incorrect even though you said it was
poor people like anyone else pay taxes and contribute towards healthcare
your personal experience doesn't change that but thanks for sharing it
thats great, doesn't negate the fact you're most likely an exception not the rule
therefore nothing i have posted was incorrect even though you said it was
poor people like anyone else pay taxes and contribute towards healthcare
your personal experience doesn't change that but thanks for sharing it
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,818
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,822
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
When you pay taxes you'll want your government to be fiscally conservative. You'll also dislike people in your current situation because of their lack of contribution to the community. You might not always be a drain though, everyone starts off broke and at the bottom. My most recent tax bill is probably more than you earn.
How often do you spend the $80 on drugs?
When you pay taxes you'll want your government to be fiscally conservative. You'll also dislike people in your current situation because of their lack of contribution to the community. You might not always be a drain though, everyone starts off broke and at the bottom. My most recent tax bill is probably more than you earn.
How often do you spend the $80 on drugs?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,832
@886,818 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Quit worrying what these nerd trolls are trying to bait you with..
It's obvious they have little penises..
Quit worrying what these nerd trolls are trying to bait you with..
It's obvious they have little penises..
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,841
i also get free healthcare
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,843
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,844
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,862
@886,822 (I)
it gets deposited at the start of the month so it goes to bills
can't remember how much I made last year I think about $3.5k
it gets deposited at the start of the month so it goes to bills
can't remember how much I made last year I think about $3.5k
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,881
@886,841 (dw)
no you don't, i was wondering when you'd pop back up
you're form holland, your healthcare is not free
and not only that you pay lots of taxes on lots of things
> The basic insurance policy will cover GP visits, general medical care, paramedic, ambulance, hospital stays, midwife care, basic rehabilitation and prescriptions. There is also a compulsory own-risk excess (eigen risico) where you will pay the first €385 (in 2018) of any medical costs excluding GP visits.
what a nice country, forcing anyone thats chronically sick or needs medicine to pay an own-risk excess
no you don't, i was wondering when you'd pop back up
you're form holland, your healthcare is not free
and not only that you pay lots of taxes on lots of things
> The basic insurance policy will cover GP visits, general medical care, paramedic, ambulance, hospital stays, midwife care, basic rehabilitation and prescriptions. There is also a compulsory own-risk excess (eigen risico) where you will pay the first €385 (in 2018) of any medical costs excluding GP visits.
what a nice country, forcing anyone thats chronically sick or needs medicine to pay an own-risk excess
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 42 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,895
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,899
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,900
dw double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,901
and it isnt a financial burden if you aren't
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 48 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,917
@886,900 (dw)
@previous (dw)
it is not free even if you're poor because the government/taxman doesn't cover the insurance fee fully
@previous (dw)
it is not free even if you're poor because the government/taxman doesn't cover the insurance fee fully
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 51 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,932
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,946
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #886,947
@previous (F)
keep not explaining how no national healthcare is better than paying €385 if you go to the hospital
keep not explaining how no national healthcare is better than paying €385 if you go to the hospital
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #887,082
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 8 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #887,165
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 52 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #887,173
@previous (dw)
you're required by law to have health insurance in holland
guess your parents pay, which also explains your other posts on the board
ignorance is bliss i guess
you're required by law to have health insurance in holland
guess your parents pay, which also explains your other posts on the board
ignorance is bliss i guess
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,177
@previous (F)
https://www.belastingdienst.nl/wps/wcm/connect/bldcontentnl/belastingdienst/prive/toeslagen/zorgtoeslag/
https://www.belastingdienst.nl/wps/wcm/connect/bldcontentnl/belastingdienst/prive/toeslagen/zorgtoeslag/
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,184
@previous (dw)
they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,199
@previous (F)
> they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
i am aware. the cheapest policy covers pretty much all important things except dentistry
> which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
depends on the specific policy you get, most of them give free choice or free choice with a few exceptions. i can go to any hospital
> but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
keep on thinking trumps lack of healthcare is better
> they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
i am aware. the cheapest policy covers pretty much all important things except dentistry
> which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
depends on the specific policy you get, most of them give free choice or free choice with a few exceptions. i can go to any hospital
> but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
keep on thinking trumps lack of healthcare is better
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,227
@previous (dw)
> > they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
> i am aware. the cheapest policy covers pretty much all important things except dentistry
except you can't choose which hospital, specialist or doctor you want, the insurance company decides for you
> > which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
> depends on the specific policy you get, most of them give free choice or free choice with a few exceptions. i can go to any hospital
there is only 1 policy under 94 euro which has very limited hospital choice, not any hospital
> > but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
> keep on thinking trumps lack of healthcare is better
where did i even mention trump? i just called you and triptych out on your false "i have free healthcare" claims
> > they don't refund the own risk excess and the rebate only covers the cheapest policy there is (94 euro max)
> i am aware. the cheapest policy covers pretty much all important things except dentistry
except you can't choose which hospital, specialist or doctor you want, the insurance company decides for you
> > which is one where you cant even choose hospitals or other caregivers if you need them, they decide for you
> depends on the specific policy you get, most of them give free choice or free choice with a few exceptions. i can go to any hospital
there is only 1 policy under 94 euro which has very limited hospital choice, not any hospital
> > but keep on thinking your health care is free, this is getting tedious
> keep on thinking trumps lack of healthcare is better
where did i even mention trump? i just called you and triptych out on your false "i have free healthcare" claims
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,294
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,305
@previous (dw)
effectively free unless you actually need it beyond a gp visit and then still all medicine has to be paid till your own risk excess is reached
if you develop an illness or get hit by a car and need something from the pharmacy after your hospital recovery you'd have to pay for them until you paid the 385 euro own risk excess
effectively free unless you actually need it beyond a gp visit and then still all medicine has to be paid till your own risk excess is reached
if you develop an illness or get hit by a car and need something from the pharmacy after your hospital recovery you'd have to pay for them until you paid the 385 euro own risk excess
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,307
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,313
@previous (dw)
i wasnt refuting that, only refuting your claim its free
its not free, but you admitted that already
i wasnt refuting that, only refuting your claim its free
its not free, but you admitted that already
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,315
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,317
@previous (dw)
do i need one? you claimed it was free while it isnt
also you're contributing to your own healthcare rebates by paying VAT on things you buy
not to mention the insane percentage of income tax levied in holland
do i need one? you claimed it was free while it isnt
also you're contributing to your own healthcare rebates by paying VAT on things you buy
not to mention the insane percentage of income tax levied in holland
dw replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,348
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,424
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,526
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
yeah you're the exception that proves the rule, already established that
you still haven't told me what i was incorrect about but i wil stop asking
yeah you're the exception that proves the rule, already established that
you still haven't told me what i was incorrect about but i wil stop asking
Anonymous F double-posted this 8 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #887,527
q. replied with this 8 years ago, 2 weeks later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #892,173
@885,569 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
its more the gop's platform as a whole thats cancer really, and his support of it.
its more the gop's platform as a whole thats cancer really, and his support of it.
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #892,284
