Minichan

Topic: Original Night Stalker arrested

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL started this discussion 8 years ago #74,656

http://fox40.com/2018/04/24/east-area-rapist-suspect-identified-arrested/

shiiiiiiit

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #884,059

probably isn't the real criminal

but an arrest like this looks real good

we should buy that police precinct more military gear so they can keep up the good work

(Edited 35 seconds later.)

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #884,061

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
alleged DNA match

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #884,063

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
DNA is by no means infallible evidence.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,069

@884,061 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I just submitted the question to Google - How often is DNA analysis in error
Then narrowed that down to - Errors in DNA Criminal convictions

Turns out after looking at sources like Atlantic Monthly that write extensive articles on a case study - Yes errors occurr and so far the worst of the worst are ferreted out by the defense attorney b4 conviction But so far there is not that much in data base of very bad errors

Family errors where the other family member was the Perp - And really really bad lab errors - Science is only as good as the people doing that lab work - Machines of course are so much better than a lab worker strung out on Oxycontin.

Am about to take my 1st sip of Triple Espresso so perhaps my conclusions will be more better with more case studies

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,070

@884,059 (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
It is a 100% dna match. Also he was a cop during all but one of the rapes

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,072

They're saying that his wife's name was Bonnie and that is a name that the victims would hear him muttering

He also spent time and the Navy and that explains complicated knots he would use

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,077

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
1:He was a police officer in Auburn, CA although was fired from this position after being caught shoplifting in 1979
So what did he shoplift? "stole dog repellent and a hammer."

Syntax double-posted this 8 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,078

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,080

@884,077 (Syntax)
Right? And it was noted how he was easily able to get past guard dogs

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,083

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Looking for current photo BUT sites that claim to have it are JAMMED LoL including Twitter all jammed up
Did you get a view of wot he looks like currently?

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,085

@884,070 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Again... DNA should not be used as evidence in a court of law AT ALL. It SHOULD be used as an investigation tool, but keep it out of the courts.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,086

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
> Again... DNA should not be used as evidence in a court of law AT ALL

Cite your scientific evidence please.

This might be like the case of where The local MC Pedophile claimed years later he had Legionnaires YET the Evidence turned out to really be Tuberculous.

One has to be careful of such a person because he is the Anal Wart Understudy of Donald Trump and his truth gets quickly flushed down daily

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,091

@previous (Syntax)
It should be common sense, honestly. Your DNA being somewhere doesn't mean shit and DNA evidence today does not meet the standards for admissible evidence.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,092

@884,083 (Syntax)
Not yet, but I've been looking on reddit

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #884,093

@884,085 (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
Several life events have matched up with breaks in the attacks. The birth of his child for instance.
Aldo he was sending harassing calls to one of his victims, and she heard a woman and child in the background

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,095

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Okay, so then why bring in the DNA evidence if the case is otherwise so strong? People think DNA evidence is a magic bullet and is infallible but it is not and has no place in the justice system.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,097

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
Because its a part of many other pieces of evidence? If it turns about to be his semen in a rape victims anus, would you consider that to be a coincedence?

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,098

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I am thinking Pink has great fears his DNA is going to end up getting him locked up where his Anus will be filled daily with semen. More like betting he wood enjoy that on conditions that should not really end up in print here

Also Betting DNA of Pink relates to some truly sad relatives who end up amounting 2$ not so much

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,099

@884,097 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The DNA analysts are paid to make a match, not to properly analyze. They amplify the markers that exist in every human until they get a match.

Here is some reading for you: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/a-reasonable-doubt/480747/

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,100

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
“If this is incompetence, it’s gross incompetence … and repeated gross incompetence,” Thompson said. “You have to wonder if [the techs] could really be that stupid.”


So of course there are incompetent lab techs.

Betting your fear Pink is that Cops will capture you soon and lock you up.

A few bad lab techs to NOT negate all the great work DNA is doing - Hell one fool here claimed he was Black because he had his DNA tested but that LAB has proven to make false claims and Snopes has a great article about the bad DNA work they do

Shit happens n sorry your DNA re family results ends up so cough cough Worthless LOLOLOL

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,101

@previous (Syntax)
Read the whole thing. Thanks.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,102

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
So I did exactly that AND
DNA analysis has risen above all other forensic techniques for good reason: “No [other] forensic method has been rigorously shown able to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source,” the National Research Council


Now trying to be as fair as is humanly possible
“Ironically, you have a technology that was meant to help eliminate subjectivity in forensics,” Erin Murphy, a law professor at NYU, told me recently. “But when you start to drill down deeper into the way crime laboratories operate today, you see that the subjectivity is still there: Standards vary, training levels vary, quality varies.”


Or to be more than fair
And some are tragic, like the tale of Dwayne Jackson, an African American teenager who pleaded guilty to robbery in 2003 after being presented with damning DNA evidence, and was exonerated years later, in 2011, after a police department in Nevada admitted that its lab had accidentally swapped Jackson’s DNA with the real culprit’s.


In other words SHIT happens and Mistrakes are made.

Or
The growing potential for mistakes in DNA testing has inspired a solution fitting for the digital age: automation, or the “complete removal of the human being from doing any subjective decision making,” as Mark Perlin, the CEO of the DNA-testing firm Cybergenetics, put it to me recently.


This is similar to my often stated case that someone who has taken 25 years to learn a few languages is going to make translation mistrakes and simple Apps based on a SuperComputer like Watson will end up far more faster and reliable

NOW IF U had read it all? YOU Wood have read the very bottom line conclusion

“DNA is science. You can’t blame DNA. You can only blame the people who used it wrong.”

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,103

@previous (Syntax)
I'm not Matt, you fucking retard.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,104

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
Now exactly where did I say you were?

Math says however that of all the new so called new people here 98.041% +/- 1% happen to be the Pedophile

So of course until you offer to Meta to out You - One can only with a hi degree of accuracy subject of course to human error B who you are

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,108

@previous (Syntax)
Every single one of your posts which cite me in this topic is rife with several allusions to MAtt and your overwhelming obsession with him. At that point, you don't even have to specifically say 'you are matt'. Your delusion is clear.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,119

@previous (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)
Why is your text speech, exactly like Matts?

Pink !tMZAN/iuUU replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,121

@previous (E)
Why, praytell, is your Matt obsession, exactly like Syntax's?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,293

@884,083 (Syntax)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,300

Syntax is retarded

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 58 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,301

@884,293 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Ah thanks - As a result of yours I got this

squeegee joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,405

apparently his dick was so small that at least one of his victims burst out laughing while she was being assaulted. i think tinydick may be an understatement here.

Mordor joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,406

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #884,424

@884,099 (Pink !tMZAN/iuUU)

> The DNA analysts are paid to make a match, not to properly analyze. They amplify the markers that exist in every human until they get a match.
>
> Here is some reading for you: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/a-reasonable-doubt/480747/

thabks, Jeeves!

tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 weeks later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,166

i wonder if it'll turn out he has a tiny dick, like some of his victims alleged

paging becky

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,209

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
His one Asian victim said that he had a big dick. Much bigger than her husband's LMAO

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,211

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
That might be 3.9 inches. Looked yesterday at dicks vs country and it's a sad state of affairs because their thumbs are larger than their dicks.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,224

@previous (K)
Maybe its okay because the women have smaller vaginas?

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,226

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Of the 40 or so vaginas I have experienced only one was on the large size.

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,229

@previous (L)
Depth not width.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,238

@890,226 (L)
Did it make the sex worse?

Anonymous L replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,250

@890,229 (B)
Have always touched the cervix just a wee bit. Never really noticed depths all that different. Not much experience with different races.

Anonymous L double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,251

@890,238 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The larger one - Yea it felt hummmm just as if I could have put my full fist in with my penis and still had room left.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,265

@previous (L)
Weird. Did you tell her?

Anonymous L replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,269

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
She was so nice. Well toned body. Terrific boobs. Just hummmm Vag was very much like oral sex except with her Vag lol
And there is no way to communicate something like that

Reminds me to share a story about another

(Edited 1 minute later.)

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,283

@previous (L)
Please do

Anonymous L replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,287

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Need to think about how to make a topic about that one. Have a few with each worth a topic about. Of the many advantages of age is experiences.

One Ex GF required the help of a couple of Swat teams and that again is a story for some other time. Worth every minute of the three years yet the last three days - anyway so many stories in this naked city about experiences

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #890,307

@890,250 (L)
vaginas expand with arousal, interestingly
she just wasn't very into you
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.