Topic: The DNC is suing everybody. Discovery is going to be so much fun!
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #74,580
Wikileaks is ready, Trump legal team is ready. Can't wait till this starts. Maybe we'll find out why the DNC hasn't let the FBI have look at the server they claimed was hacked by Russia.
Also can't wait for the HRC supporters here to come in and defend HRC team when they smashed phones with hammers, went on Reddit to get tips on how to tamper with subpoeneaed emails (they didn't get much tips so they ended up deleting them all with BleachBit).
All in all HRC is much, much worse than Trump. Not to mention HRC attacking women that accused Bill of raping them. She's so crooked it's amazing she does't walk with a limp.
Nixie !UtFtBGHW4U joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #883,539
Just because Hillary was crooked, doesn't give Trump the right to be.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,545
@previous (Nixie !UtFtBGHW4U)
Tit for tat. Trump can do whatever he wants because Killary was literally the devil. Cry moar.
Tit for tat. Trump can do whatever he wants because Killary was literally the devil. Cry moar.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,549
What I like most is that losing the elections gave her a free pass somehow.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,565
The lawsuit is Hillarys idea, she's a fucking lawyer. That old bitch is still running the DNC, into the ground though because this won't be cheap.
Have you heard how ridiculous the whole thing is? They went the same route as Scientology, and are trying to say lying, cheating, and rigging the primary are "trade secrets" that WikiLeaks published. And they are trying to use the DMCA! Not just trade secrets, but copyrighted? Good luck with that.
Way to go Dems, you just fueled up the Fox News outrage machine with a frivolous lawsuit that's clutching at straws.
Have you heard how ridiculous the whole thing is? They went the same route as Scientology, and are trying to say lying, cheating, and rigging the primary are "trade secrets" that WikiLeaks published. And they are trying to use the DMCA! Not just trade secrets, but copyrighted? Good luck with that.
Way to go Dems, you just fueled up the Fox News outrage machine with a frivolous lawsuit that's clutching at straws.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,566
@previous (D)
> Fox News outrage machine with a frivolous lawsuit that's clutching at straws
Good for US economy. Advertisers love this shit. Hosts end up with pay raise. Family and whores of hosts end up with more money.
USA economy continues to thrive.
> Fox News outrage machine with a frivolous lawsuit that's clutching at straws
Good for US economy. Advertisers love this shit. Hosts end up with pay raise. Family and whores of hosts end up with more money.
USA economy continues to thrive.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,567
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 34 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,575
> Trump legal team
Lol, he will need a new one now that his "lawyer" is being reamed by the feds for being a crook. Just like his national security advisor, his campaign manager, other campaign staff, several members of his current cabinet and who knows how many others in the days to come. Not to say that this Dem lawsuit is likely to achieve anything (I'm skeptical anything will come of it), or that Hillary didn't have her weaknesses, but holy moly the equivocating going on here is beyond comprehension.
Also the wikileaks legal team is Julian Assange in a wig and fake mustache Skyping into court using the wifi from the pizzeria next to the Ecuadorian embassy.
Lol, he will need a new one now that his "lawyer" is being reamed by the feds for being a crook. Just like his national security advisor, his campaign manager, other campaign staff, several members of his current cabinet and who knows how many others in the days to come. Not to say that this Dem lawsuit is likely to achieve anything (I'm skeptical anything will come of it), or that Hillary didn't have her weaknesses, but holy moly the equivocating going on here is beyond comprehension.
Also the wikileaks legal team is Julian Assange in a wig and fake mustache Skyping into court using the wifi from the pizzeria next to the Ecuadorian embassy.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,577
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
suddenly wikileaks are bad guys, wow
i actually donated to the wikileaks legal fund
as for trump, there are more lawyers than criminals, it'll be alright
@883,567 (F)
saved
suddenly wikileaks are bad guys, wow
i actually donated to the wikileaks legal fund
as for trump, there are more lawyers than criminals, it'll be alright
@883,567 (F)
saved
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 22 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,578
@883,575 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Trump needs exercise. In the near future he will be able to exercise his powers of pardons.
He can also offer Assange with a visa and make Assange a citizen of USA. Not sure if he can actually do that but he can pull the strings to make it happen.
Trump needs exercise. In the near future he will be able to exercise his powers of pardons.
He can also offer Assange with a visa and make Assange a citizen of USA. Not sure if he can actually do that but he can pull the strings to make it happen.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,582
@883,577 (A)
I mean it's not suddenly. Assange opposed the release of the Panama papers because he said they were a western plot to undermine Putin. Dude has been compromised for a while.
I mean it's not suddenly. Assange opposed the release of the Panama papers because he said they were a western plot to undermine Putin. Dude has been compromised for a while.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 8 years ago, 35 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,583
@883,578 (H)
He can but he isn't going to obviously. Do you think John Bolton or Mike Pompeo want Julian Assange free? Lol.
He can but he isn't going to obviously. Do you think John Bolton or Mike Pompeo want Julian Assange free? Lol.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,587
@883,582 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
for arguments sake, even if he is a bad actor doesn't automatically invalidates what wikileaks has published
those mails can be verified using google's keys, unless you think wikileaks has cracked those
for arguments sake, even if he is a bad actor doesn't automatically invalidates what wikileaks has published
those mails can be verified using google's keys, unless you think wikileaks has cracked those
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,589
@previous (A)
I don't dispute the veracity of them, I just think he clearly had a political axe to grind and doesn't actually give a shit about transparency, he just pretends to so that people will focus on what he's releasing and not why he's releasing it, or what he's not releasing.
I don't dispute the veracity of them, I just think he clearly had a political axe to grind and doesn't actually give a shit about transparency, he just pretends to so that people will focus on what he's releasing and not why he's releasing it, or what he's not releasing.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,591
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)in the end everybody has a bias
the emails are clear thought
it also contains emails from podesta setting up the whole russian narrative
but you wont see cnn report on that, in fact cnn tells you that you can't view them, but they can lol
entertaining but also a bit embarrassing haha, love this guy though!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-beYBLrkNAg
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,597
@previous (A)
I don't remember reading podesta setting up anything. The Russia narrative was kind of obvious when Trump hired Manafort and Carter Page, then asked Russia to release any emails they may have stolen from Clinton's server. Doesn't take a genius to figure out what's going on behind the scenes there.
Also CNN is largely not great but I never watch cable news and only sporadically read its online offerings.
I don't remember reading podesta setting up anything. The Russia narrative was kind of obvious when Trump hired Manafort and Carter Page, then asked Russia to release any emails they may have stolen from Clinton's server. Doesn't take a genius to figure out what's going on behind the scenes there.
Also CNN is largely not great but I never watch cable news and only sporadically read its online offerings.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,603
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
still wouldn't explain why the dnc isn't letting the feds check if the server was really hacked by russia
we have to be believe a private company on its word, a company thats anything but independent 3rd party
but even if russia hacked it, the emails are real, those are factual, i like facts
i will link you the email if i can find it again
it will speak for itself, debating polics is senseless anyways
the emails really speak for themselves
also there's another dnc lawsuit
but thats even less reported on even by fox
http://www.newsweek.com/dnc-fraud-lawsuit-claims-bernie-sanders-would-have-won-rigged-election-hillary-611165
still wouldn't explain why the dnc isn't letting the feds check if the server was really hacked by russia
we have to be believe a private company on its word, a company thats anything but independent 3rd party
but even if russia hacked it, the emails are real, those are factual, i like facts
i will link you the email if i can find it again
it will speak for itself, debating polics is senseless anyways
the emails really speak for themselves
also there's another dnc lawsuit
but thats even less reported on even by fox
http://www.newsweek.com/dnc-fraud-lawsuit-claims-bernie-sanders-would-have-won-rigged-election-hillary-611165
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,606
@883,597 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)i have to actually myself, it was just the team
but still pretty damning stuff imho
they were already working some idea of trump and russia
also by their own standards of collusion they themselves are guilty of it too
with neo-nazi aligned groups in ukraine for example
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27381
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,625
@previous (A)
So someone did a Google search on Simes and came up with articles about his links with Russia published in the Washington Free Beacon and the Wall Street Journal. How is that collusion? What does that have to do with neo-nazi groups?
Where's the pretty damning stuff?
So someone did a Google search on Simes and came up with articles about his links with Russia published in the Washington Free Beacon and the Wall Street Journal. How is that collusion? What does that have to do with neo-nazi groups?
Where's the pretty damning stuff?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,630
@previous (I)
> ties well into the that Trumps is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia
it implies the campaign was already working on this russia stuff
in my opinion that is damning, in yours it isn't, welcome to the internet
i'll just repeat myself; by their own standards their also guilty of collusion
with ukrainians that are allied with neo-nazi groups instead of russians
> ties well into the that Trumps is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia
it implies the campaign was already working on this russia stuff
in my opinion that is damning, in yours it isn't, welcome to the internet
i'll just repeat myself; by their own standards their also guilty of collusion
with ukrainians that are allied with neo-nazi groups instead of russians
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #883,654
@previous (A)
Just asserting something and linking to emails full of banal conversation isn't helping to prove your conspiracy theories. You're welcome to believe whatever you like. Maybe Hillary is a reptile?
Just asserting something and linking to emails full of banal conversation isn't helping to prove your conspiracy theories. You're welcome to believe whatever you like. Maybe Hillary is a reptile?