Topic: Democratic Party files lawsuit against Trump campaign, Russia, and WikiLeaks
squeegee started this discussion 8 years ago #74,490
The Democratic Party has filed a lawsuit in federal court against President Donald Trump's campaign, the Russian government, and the organization WikiLeaks.The suit alleges the three defendants illegally conspired to hurt the Democratic Party by engineering the hack of the Democratic National Committee and disseminating stolen materials during the 2016 election.When the DNC filed a civil against former President Richard Nixon's reelection committee in the 1970s, the Nixon campaign ultimately had to shell out $750,000 to settle the case.
http://www.businessinsider.com/democratic-party-lawsuit-trump-russia-wikileaks-2018-4
http://www.businessinsider.com/democratic-party-lawsuit-trump-russia-wikileaks-2018-4
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #882,702
But didn't the DNC along with Hillary Clinton, conspire against Bernie Sanders?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #882,704
lol butthurt Demcucks.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 18 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #882,711
@882,702 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Yes and after the law suit is won, Bernie will sue for all the money and win.
Yes and after the law suit is won, Bernie will sue for all the money and win.
Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 51 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #882,712
@882,702 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> But didn't the DNC along with Hillary Clinton, conspire against Bernie Sanders?
They're projecting so hard.
@OP
They should sue themselves for running such a lameass candidate ?
> But didn't the DNC along with Hillary Clinton, conspire against Bernie Sanders?
They're projecting so hard.
@OP
They should sue themselves for running such a lameass candidate ?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 57 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,722
@882,702 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Squeegee is hardline Democrat. If the Dems had Trump, he would have voted Trump!
Squeegee is hardline Democrat. If the Dems had Trump, he would have voted Trump!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 58 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,756
lol what
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,759
More than a year later, and the democraps are still crying?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,761
@previous (H)
Back in the day Hitler was the most popular leader in Germany. Loved by many.
Many others cried as it should be.
Back in the day Hitler was the most popular leader in Germany. Loved by many.
Many others cried as it should be.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,763
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,764
squeegee (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,768
@882,702 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Its conspiracy to run a private organization as they see fit? No. It's conspiracy to organize with a foreign power to influence an election. If you're going to try and normalize this with "whataboutism" then at least to to equate things that are similar and not entirely completely different things. Thanks.
@882,722 (F)
That's utter bullshit and you know it.
Nice Fox news talking points itt, cant any of you form opinions on your own? Jesus.
Its conspiracy to run a private organization as they see fit? No. It's conspiracy to organize with a foreign power to influence an election. If you're going to try and normalize this with "whataboutism" then at least to to equate things that are similar and not entirely completely different things. Thanks.
@882,722 (F)
That's utter bullshit and you know it.
Nice Fox news talking points itt, cant any of you form opinions on your own? Jesus.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,769
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,774
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,777
Anonymous L replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,780
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I'm sure that's how Trump would feel if he had lost the election and found out that Hillary's campaign had worked with a foreign superpower in a targeted international smear campaign against Donald Trump. I'm sure he would just keep quiet and take his lumps. Trump would probably just throw up his hands and say, "Well, I said some nasty stuff too. No one is innocent here. That's all water under the bridge. Well played, Hillary."
I'm sure that's how Trump would feel if he had lost the election and found out that Hillary's campaign had worked with a foreign superpower in a targeted international smear campaign against Donald Trump. I'm sure he would just keep quiet and take his lumps. Trump would probably just throw up his hands and say, "Well, I said some nasty stuff too. No one is innocent here. That's all water under the bridge. Well played, Hillary."
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,781
@previous (L)
> Trump would probably just throw up his hands and say, "Well, I said some nasty stuff too
lol really. Since when has Trump apologized or conceited anything.
> Trump would probably just throw up his hands and say, "Well, I said some nasty stuff too
lol really. Since when has Trump apologized or conceited anything.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,790
@882,777 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
No. Specificity is important. The type of scumbaggery is relevant. A crooked scumbag who cheats isn't the same as a crooked scumbag who commits treason.
You are willing to admit that something like, say, treason, should be handled as a bigger crime than something like wire fraud, eh? That there actually are degrees of wrong doing? You'll at least agree that some kinds of crimes are worse than others, right?
No. Specificity is important. The type of scumbaggery is relevant. A crooked scumbag who cheats isn't the same as a crooked scumbag who commits treason.
You are willing to admit that something like, say, treason, should be handled as a bigger crime than something like wire fraud, eh? That there actually are degrees of wrong doing? You'll at least agree that some kinds of crimes are worse than others, right?
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,796
Democrats are insane.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,797
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 27 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,802
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,803
@882,790 (squeegee)
I do think that some crimes are worse than others, but we don't have proof of collusion. I also think that these are very similar crimes.
I do think that some crimes are worse than others, but we don't have proof of collusion. I also think that these are very similar crimes.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,807
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> but we don't have proof of collusion. I also think that these are very similar crimes.
the investigation isn't over and once it is we'll know what we don't know, because what we dont know is what's driving the investigation. we know a lot of tangential stuff, and we know there is some kind of evidence trail that's being investigated but we don't know all the details of that yet. we will have to let the investigation finish before passing final judgement, all we really know is that there is a lot being investigated, so i'm confident that they'll get to the bottom of it. and if trump isn't complicit in all this and is really as innocent as he insists then i'm willing to agree with the findings of the Muller investigation. I may not like the scumbag, but if he's not a traitor then so be it, he's just a piece of shit i disagree with and not a traitor to this country working to undermine american influence in the world.
but if he is, then i hope that y'all are willing to walk back all your defenses of the guy and say, "ok, fine, he needs to be removed from office," the same way i'm willing to admit, "fine, he's a legitimate president who earned his office and we owe him the respect of any other sitting president."
i may not like it, but i'm willing to agree with reality when it presents itself.
> but we don't have proof of collusion. I also think that these are very similar crimes.
the investigation isn't over and once it is we'll know what we don't know, because what we dont know is what's driving the investigation. we know a lot of tangential stuff, and we know there is some kind of evidence trail that's being investigated but we don't know all the details of that yet. we will have to let the investigation finish before passing final judgement, all we really know is that there is a lot being investigated, so i'm confident that they'll get to the bottom of it. and if trump isn't complicit in all this and is really as innocent as he insists then i'm willing to agree with the findings of the Muller investigation. I may not like the scumbag, but if he's not a traitor then so be it, he's just a piece of shit i disagree with and not a traitor to this country working to undermine american influence in the world.
but if he is, then i hope that y'all are willing to walk back all your defenses of the guy and say, "ok, fine, he needs to be removed from office," the same way i'm willing to admit, "fine, he's a legitimate president who earned his office and we owe him the respect of any other sitting president."
i may not like it, but i'm willing to agree with reality when it presents itself.
squeegee double-posted this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,808
but what i'm not willing to do is trust trump's word in all this. he may, MAY not be a traitor, but he's still demonstrated himself to be a liar many, numerous, multitude of times. and i can't understand why anyone would take him at his word on anything at this point.kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 26 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,816
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,824
@882,808 (squeegee)
> but what i'm not willing to do is trust trump's word in all this. he may, MAY not be a traitor, but he's still demonstrated himself to be a liar many, numerous, multitude of times. and i can't understand why anyone would take him at his word on anything at this point.
This sounds like Republicans talking about Hillary
> but what i'm not willing to do is trust trump's word in all this. he may, MAY not be a traitor, but he's still demonstrated himself to be a liar many, numerous, multitude of times. and i can't understand why anyone would take him at his word on anything at this point.
This sounds like Republicans talking about Hillary
Anonymous M replied with this 8 years ago, 8 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,880
So, Wikileaks and Julian Assange are being sued by the Democrats for revealing how the Dems rigged the primaries. They are counter suing, have never lost a publishing case, and are looking forward to the discovery phase. I just donated to their legal defense. Thanks
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 59 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,884
Itt: sqeegee's delicious tears flow like a river..
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #882,903
Fuck the neocons that have taken over the Democrat party and fuck the Russians of the GOP.