Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Transgender activist 'punched radical feminist who was filming her at Hyde Park protest

Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #74,234

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5607919/Transgender-activist-battered-radical-feminist-Speakers-Corner-brawl.html

Transgender activist 'punched radical feminist who was filming her at Hyde Park protest because she thought she was trying to expose her gender identity online'

Maria MacLachlan, 61, attended a demonstration at Speakers' Corner last year
She claims transgender activist Tara Wolf attacked her and broke her camera
A judge warned Ms MacLachlan to refer to Ms Wolf using the correct pronoun
Ms Wolf, 26, of no fixed abode, denies one count of assault by beating

A radical feminist who claims she was attacked by a transgender activist during a protest denies she was filming her in order to 'out' her as transgender online.

Tara Wolf, 26, is accused of assaulting Maria MacLachlan, 61, during a demonstration at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park on September 13, last year.

Under cross examination from Ms Wolf's defense counsel Jodie Anderson, Ms McLachlan denied a suggestion she was seeking to 'out' Ms Wolf as transgender online.

She claimed she had pulled out the camera and started filming because she thought she would get some 'amusing footage'.

But Jodie Anderson, defending, argued she was deliberately trying to antagonise the protesters and intended to post the footage on her blog, Facebook page and Twitter in a bid to out them as trans.

Wolf, who faces one charge of assault by beating, admits being involved in the fracas but insists she was acting in self-defence.

Ms Maclachlan, who is active on social media, said: 'I thought it would make some very amusing footage - it didn't really occur to me that someone standing several feet away with a camera would be antagonising when they themselves had voluntarily gone along to this event.'

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #880,313

Kill them both.

hamfist !Ly73F8lTq6 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,315

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,317

@previous (hamfist !Ly73F8lTq6)
hamfist, would you do that chick with a dick?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,319

> because she thought she would get some 'amusing footage'.
how does that not warrant a... a punch? just a punch? why is this news

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,324

@previous (E)
Everyone records everything nowadays

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 58 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,325

@880,319 (E)
After yesterdays Spam sessions by Catherine and her potential lovers...I found this topic. Agree it does not have much news value.

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 33 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,327

@880,324 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
rude

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,338

@previous (E)
Its true though. You actually approve of a grown man punching a 60 year old woman over filming a protest?

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 24 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,339

@880,324 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Kook

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 52 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,340

@previous (B)
What?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,342

@880,338 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The left eats itself while the right feasts on Trump steaks!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #880,343

Externally hosted image@previous (G)

hamfist !Ly73F8lTq6 replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,349

@880,317 (D)
konata? yes

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,353

@880,319 (E)
how dare someone document a public event

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,354

@880,340 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You were on IRC this morning but AFK

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,357

@previous (B)
Yes I was. I had wanted to bother Mark, but I fell asleep

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,359

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I could tell because I was kooking you.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #880,360

@previous (B)
Why you kook me though? Why

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #880,366

> dailymail

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #880,375

Well everyone knows she's a tranny now for sure! What a fucking idiot.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #880,518

In earlier days, we would have read the headline as: pervert strikes spinster upon face

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #880,580

@880,360 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I needed to axe you a question.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.