Topic: Mass shooting at YouTube headquarters
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #73,890
But remember, it Is 100%, completely unrelated to guns. Thanks.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 41 seconds later[^] [v] #877,733
well that's a relief
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #877,735
Guns dont kill people, people kill people.
You actually want it it be guns because the alternative is bombs.
You actually want it it be guns because the alternative is bombs.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,742
Keep it in one thread, @OPenis
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,743
How ironic. I bet it was one of those gun free zones
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
??? !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,745
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ? protects the right to a "well regulated militia".
> A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
> A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 40 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,746
??? !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,748
@previous (C)
The Second Amendment didn't start protecting a citizen's right to firearms until a 2008 Supreme Court case [info].
The Second Amendment didn't start protecting a citizen's right to firearms until a 2008 Supreme Court case [info].
Big Daddy Derek™ !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,749
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,750
I bet, if she didn’t blow her head off, google would have paid her as she would sue for some snowflake reason. Ah I’m sure the family will settle
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,752
@previous (E)
> would sue for some snowflake reason
Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
> would sue for some snowflake reason
Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,757
@previous (H)
> > would sue for some snowflake reason
>
> Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
Maybe you should vote for Bernie again
> > would sue for some snowflake reason
>
> Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
Maybe you should vote for Bernie again
Anonymous E double-posted this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,763
@877,752 (H)
> > would sue for some snowflake reason
>
> Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
Or, are you pissed that your vote didn’t count?
> > would sue for some snowflake reason
>
> Maybe you should try suing Google for your butthurt. You might have a case.
Or, are you pissed that your vote didn’t count?
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,765
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,770
Safe space needed
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 11 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #877,771
@877,748 (??? !TGirlYJKXM)
Yes it did... the supreme court merely interprets the constitution, they don't change what was written.
Yes it did... the supreme court merely interprets the constitution, they don't change what was written.
??? !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #877,774
@previous (C)
They interrupted that the amendment applied to citizens that aren't a part of a well regulated militia. No shit.
That doesn't mean the amendment's original intentions were ever that.
They interrupted that the amendment applied to citizens that aren't a part of a well regulated militia. No shit.
That doesn't mean the amendment's original intentions were ever that.
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #877,775
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,799
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,801
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,914
what's with all the homosexuality
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,917
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 46 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,920
THere's some actor with a a name that I didn't understand and this is how I remember it
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,926
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #877,931
I hardly think about my weiner and wear pants over them