Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#876,401
Sure go ahead and post that set of photos of your sexy cousin nakkid. She will never have a clue.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,402
It's about the principle of the matter thanks.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,403
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Is that code for - Meta has pics of your roommate.
lol
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,407
Let's find out!
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,409
@previous (E)
Pics of Chris Chan have always been legal here. However puke is also legal to show and no one really needs to see either.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,410
@previous (B)
The question was how upset someone can really get if their picture is posted on a site they've never heard of.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#876,411
@previous (E)
The age old question. "if a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it does it make a sound"
Actually no one need be present for the tree to make a sound.
Often people Google their own name and they can become quickly aware their life is being made fun of or worse.
One wonders what happens when the extended family of Fatfuck Googles the family name and discovers what we all have a clue what will be viewed.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 8 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#876,416
@876,403 (D)
No he does not, I have told very few people her dox.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#876,421
@876,411 (B)
Yes, but as far as we know google doesn't have facial recognition software going through and tagging otherwise unlabelled images of people with their actual names, so the image here would only show up in a search of similar images for one that is already linked with their name (and the threshold for 'similar' images is extremely loose).
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#876,422
@previous (E)
Google's present software attempts to spread images in places they do not belong. I often run across chan images including 4chan's that really have no business in the topic I am looking for.
The Fatfuck family photoshop series end up all over Google.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#876,442
You can find stories about people who were surprised to find out old pictures of them were being used in popular Internet memes. I imagine it would be sort like that only creepier because just a small group of Internet weirdos were posting your picture. Sort of like how Kook imagines gangstalking works.