Topic: Another school shooting today in USAmerica
Depressionman™ !iAYoMftFR2 started this discussion 8 years ago #73,389
But remember, it is totally unrelated to guns.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #874,368
you're right, it isn't totally unrelated to guns but the issue isnt the guns themselves, sit on that for a minute
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,369
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,370
@previous (A)
people have had guns in their homes in America for hundreds of years, why has it only become a problem in the last 30 or so years? who benefits from this, all questions you should ask yourself before you attack the guns themselves
people have had guns in their homes in America for hundreds of years, why has it only become a problem in the last 30 or so years? who benefits from this, all questions you should ask yourself before you attack the guns themselves
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 32 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,371
@previous (B)
Because the second amendment was 200 fucking years ago written for a sparse population of farmers.
Because the second amendment was 200 fucking years ago written for a sparse population of farmers.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,373
@previous (A)
so what does your ideal gun control look like then? a complete disarming of the populace?
so what does your ideal gun control look like then? a complete disarming of the populace?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,374
@previous (B)
Something like Swiss is ok. Can own for national protection, but must keep locked at home with separate locked ammo, and the government checks to make sure you are doing that.
Something like Swiss is ok. Can own for national protection, but must keep locked at home with separate locked ammo, and the government checks to make sure you are doing that.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,375
@previous (A)
I'm sorry but that is never going to happen, that idea alone is one of the reasons the second amendment is in place, to stop authoritarian governments from interfering with the lives of the people.
I'm sorry but that is never going to happen, that idea alone is one of the reasons the second amendment is in place, to stop authoritarian governments from interfering with the lives of the people.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,376
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,377
Why fetishized one amendment above all others and above everything else in the constitution? What about the right to life?
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 26 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,378
@874,376 (A)
Switzerland is also a much smaller country than the U.S with a less armed population. I cant believe others don't see the gun control arguments being offered as authoritarian, why do you think all of these shootings are happening? The news covers them extensively and sways public opinion toward gun control, its dystopic, they want our guns so we can be pushed around like cattle. open your fucking eyes
Switzerland is also a much smaller country than the U.S with a less armed population. I cant believe others don't see the gun control arguments being offered as authoritarian, why do you think all of these shootings are happening? The news covers them extensively and sways public opinion toward gun control, its dystopic, they want our guns so we can be pushed around like cattle. open your fucking eyes
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,379
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,380
@previous (A)
> Dude, children are being murdered every week.
maybe you should focus on the people orchestrating these shootings, you should focus on the news blowing them up to huge proportions, these aren't just kids with mental illnesses, they are puppets. we need to cut the strings.
> Dude, children are being murdered every week.
maybe you should focus on the people orchestrating these shootings, you should focus on the news blowing them up to huge proportions, these aren't just kids with mental illnesses, they are puppets. we need to cut the strings.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 18 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,383
@OPenis
Why don't you just go and live in the EUnion? It looks like that's what you want USAmerica to become.
Why don't you just go and live in the EUnion? It looks like that's what you want USAmerica to become.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,403
Makes me laugh people think let us with a shotgun is presenting the US government from "pushing us around"
Newsflash they do that already
Newsflash they do that already
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,404
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 22 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,405
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,410
@874,374 (A)
> and the government checks to make sure you are doing that.
So you want to throw out the 2nd AND 4th amendments?!
> and the government checks to make sure you are doing that.
So you want to throw out the 2nd AND 4th amendments?!
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,431
why haven't the authorities cracked down on whatever shithole country is channeling in the guns
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,435
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Firearm_manufacturers_of_the_United_States
lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Firearm_manufacturers_of_the_United_States
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,438
THE CALLER IS IN THE HOUSE
HE'S CALLING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE
HE'S CALLING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,441
Gun deaths.
in the U.S. have been steadily dropping since 1990..
THAT'S what the gun shamers don't want to acknowledge..
in the U.S. have been steadily dropping since 1990..
THAT'S what the gun shamers don't want to acknowledge..
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
Anonymous J double-posted this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,443
the more you know..
Anonymous J triple-posted this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,446
and the alarmists became strangely quiet..
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,454
I should get a gun.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM double-posted this 8 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,455
Anonymous J replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,465
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,469
Anonymous L double-posted this 8 years ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,470
Anonymous J replied with this 8 years ago, 7 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,471
Anonymous J double-posted this 8 years ago, 31 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,483
School shootings are terrible...yes..
But people are immersing themselves into sensationalized hysterical news coverage and being manipulated into wanting to ban guns..
But people are immersing themselves into sensationalized hysterical news coverage and being manipulated into wanting to ban guns..
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,488
@874,375 (B)
> to stop authoritarian governments from interfering with the lives of the people.
Yet you don't mind living in a country with Draconian laws regarding who can drink alcohol or take soft drugs?
Your 'reasoning' is retarded. Why do you even have a government and laws if you're so fucking paranoid about them? The same redneck dipshits who demand the "authoritarian government" stays out of people's private affairs when it comes to guns are the exact same retards who demand laws forbidding abortion, drugs, alcohol etc. "We don't believe in authoritarianism! That's why we need to stack the Supreme Court with Republican judges who will crack down on every Amendment except the 2nd!"
> to stop authoritarian governments from interfering with the lives of the people.
Yet you don't mind living in a country with Draconian laws regarding who can drink alcohol or take soft drugs?
Your 'reasoning' is retarded. Why do you even have a government and laws if you're so fucking paranoid about them? The same redneck dipshits who demand the "authoritarian government" stays out of people's private affairs when it comes to guns are the exact same retards who demand laws forbidding abortion, drugs, alcohol etc. "We don't believe in authoritarianism! That's why we need to stack the Supreme Court with Republican judges who will crack down on every Amendment except the 2nd!"
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,496
@previous (M)
you call me a redneck and assume I support the drug war because of what I said in a thread specifically regarding guns?
My right to smoke weed or drink beer isn't protected by the law of the land, I still do those things and it is fucked up that you could go to jail for it. Guns are a hot button issue right now and it is more important than ever that we keep our arms, don't let the puppet masters pull your strings
you call me a redneck and assume I support the drug war because of what I said in a thread specifically regarding guns?
My right to smoke weed or drink beer isn't protected by the law of the land, I still do those things and it is fucked up that you could go to jail for it. Guns are a hot button issue right now and it is more important than ever that we keep our arms, don't let the puppet masters pull your strings
16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,497
@previous (B)
lol this fucking idiot want to turn the debate arund to drugs because he can't directly address the actual points made against him because if he did he would know that he is a total fucking idiot
lol this fucking idiot want to turn the debate arund to drugs because he can't directly address the actual points made against him because if he did he would know that he is a total fucking idiot
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,501
@874,496 (B)
Calling for gun restrictions isn't the same as disarming the populace or striking the second amendment. You're hysterically conflating these situations while warning people against being controlled by hysterical news coverage.
Calling for gun restrictions isn't the same as disarming the populace or striking the second amendment. You're hysterically conflating these situations while warning people against being controlled by hysterical news coverage.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,502
@previous (O)
you're right that gun restrictions isn't the same as disarming the populace, but it really is a slippery slope. i know the connotations that phrase has but restricting guns will lead to full disarming if there is not a point where people cry out about it. who benefits from gun control? certainly not you or me
you're right that gun restrictions isn't the same as disarming the populace, but it really is a slippery slope. i know the connotations that phrase has but restricting guns will lead to full disarming if there is not a point where people cry out about it. who benefits from gun control? certainly not you or me
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,505
@874,441 (J)
> Gun deaths.
> in the U.S. have been steadily dropping since 1990..
>
>
> THAT'S what the gun shamers don't want to acknowledge..
hey that's great, problem solved then
> Gun deaths.
> in the U.S. have been steadily dropping since 1990..
>
>
> THAT'S what the gun shamers don't want to acknowledge..
hey that's great, problem solved then
Depressionman !iAYoMftFR2 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,512
All I know is that in all developed countries in the world without easy civilian access to guns, there are not weekly mass shootings.