Topic: Trump said if Hillary won the election was rigged.
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #73,344
Democrats said "no waaaaay, thats impossible, would never happen in America, you can't say that!"
Then Trump wins and they claim the election was rigged...
That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
Then Trump wins and they claim the election was rigged...
That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #874,120
op
> That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
No because Trump's penis shriveled when he lost the popular vote. He needs to prove the fix was in to prevent him from that prize.
> That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
No because Trump's penis shriveled when he lost the popular vote. He needs to prove the fix was in to prevent him from that prize.
Big Daddy Derek™ !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,121
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,123
@OP
> Democrats said "no waaaaay, thats impossible, would never happen in America, you can't say that!"
>
> Then Trump wins and they claim the election was rigged...
>
> That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
no, because you are talking about two different people. the term you are using is when a single person feels discomfort when there are two competing modes of thought in the same brain, not when two different sets of people are thinking about similar things.
> Democrats said "no waaaaay, thats impossible, would never happen in America, you can't say that!"
>
> Then Trump wins and they claim the election was rigged...
>
> That's some massive cognitive dissonance right there!
no, because you are talking about two different people. the term you are using is when a single person feels discomfort when there are two competing modes of thought in the same brain, not when two different sets of people are thinking about similar things.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,125
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Wrong. The dissonance is within one party, whom holds the two beliefs that "the election couldn't have been rigged" and that "the election was definitely rigged".
Wrong. The dissonance is within one party, whom holds the two beliefs that "the election couldn't have been rigged" and that "the election was definitely rigged".
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,127
@previous (A)
No one throws a party where everyone is in agreement. That is why there are choices. Wine red or white, boxed or bottled.
No one throws a party where everyone is in agreement. That is why there are choices. Wine red or white, boxed or bottled.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #874,131
@874,125 (A)
> Wrong. The dissonance is within one party, whom holds the two beliefs that "the election couldn't have been rigged" and that "the election was definitely rigged".
ok I fugure you are playing dumb, so nevermind
> Wrong. The dissonance is within one party, whom holds the two beliefs that "the election couldn't have been rigged" and that "the election was definitely rigged".
ok I fugure you are playing dumb, so nevermind
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #874,150
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
How is what I have described not cognitive dissonance? They hold both beliefs, that the election couldnt possibly have been rigged and that it definitely was.
How is what I have described not cognitive dissonance? They hold both beliefs, that the election couldnt possibly have been rigged and that it definitely was.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #874,151
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,191
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,195
@OP
> would never happen in America
> the election couldn't have been rigged
Where did the democrats say that? Link to those quotes (or whatever they supposedly said along those lines).
> would never happen in America
> the election couldn't have been rigged
Where did the democrats say that? Link to those quotes (or whatever they supposedly said along those lines).
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #874,197
@previous (G)
It's funny because Mitch McConnell criticized the Obama administration from speaking out about Russian interference in the 2016 campaign and refused to sign on to a bipartisan statement of condemnation. The democrats weren't saying that all and were actually blocked by republicans from calling out Russian interference.
It's funny because Mitch McConnell criticized the Obama administration from speaking out about Russian interference in the 2016 campaign and refused to sign on to a bipartisan statement of condemnation. The democrats weren't saying that all and were actually blocked by republicans from calling out Russian interference.