Topic: If there is no taxation without representation...
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo started this discussion 8 years ago #72,906
Then it naturally follows that there should also be no representation without taxation. USAmericans whom fail to uphold their fiscal responsibilities should be forbidden from voting in elections. Thanks.
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agree. | 4 | 80% | |
| Can't disagree. | 1 | 20% |
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #871,359
agree completely
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #871,378
Depressionman !iAYoMftFR2 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #871,423
There is not a rule that says that there can be no taxation without representation (look at Washington, D.C.). It was the rally cry of the American revolutionaries, but there is no such law that it must be so.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #871,431
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 10 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #871,692
@871,423 (Depressionman !iAYoMftFR2)
You sound like an man whom has some experience in evading his fiscal responsibilities.
You sound like an man whom has some experience in evading his fiscal responsibilities.