Minichan

Topic: fora, I am seriously thinking about attending that one school for filmmaking.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 8 years ago #72,585

It's time I stopped being afraid to go for things. I was given this recommendation and perhaps it is a sign that I should pursue it.

The challenges to meet is finding a place to stay and/or a way to get there. I was told there was a bus that can take me out there, but there wasn't any specification about whether or not it was a commuter bus, a greyhound bus, or even a bus offered by my local transit authority or theirs.

Google Maps' bus directions say it's a four-hour drive and yet we have a road that goes straight there. So I am unsure why buses drive through Los Angeles just to get there.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #869,092

noone cars

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,093

> So I am unsure why buses drive through Los Angeles just to get there.
Where is the school located?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,095

@previous (C)
Lancaster.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,097

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
I don’t like you, but you are going to crash and burn if you don’t set realistic goals.

Your family isn’t wealthy enough to support your lack of productivity forever. You need to learn how to work and establish independence, not pursue specialized training that you’ll never be able to use.

I can’t feel bad if you end up as society’s leftovers given the decisions you make.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,099

@previous (D)
I'm looking for employment at the same time too.

I've also started to think about doing some freelance photography work,

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,101

@869,095 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Yikes - That was me as Anon C - On the map of course Lancaster is so close to you Except maybe not so much by pubic transportation

Have you ever taken a ride on Hwy 18 - Hummm all routes including the next one is 1 1/4 hours but in any case do not go near Los Angeles but again a matter of pubic transportation

Solution is get a job to buy a car in order to make this possible

Syntax double-posted this 8 years ago, 50 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,102

For sure I have never used this N5

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,103

@869,099 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
that's not a job you dunce

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,109

@previous (E)
What? Photography? That's why I included the word "also". Re-read my post, please.

Also, it's "freelance work", it's not a job or a career (though I suppose it could be those things someday).

But that is assuming we're giving "job" a specific meaning beyond "work that you are paid to do".

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 43 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,110

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
nobody is going to pay you for that. do you even know anybody?

Anonymous E double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,111

@869,109 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
also that's a totally unnecessary distinction you're nuts

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,115

@previous (E)
Well, if we were stating that photography isn't a "job", which is what I did in the post you responded to, then there was a reason to make that distinction.

If it's work one does for money then it's a job.

Either way, this would be side work, I'm searching for a job right now.

@869,110 (E)
I'll probably go on social media and see if anybody could use someone to take pictures. I'll keep my rates low. Photos for $1 or $2.

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,116

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> $1 or $2
that's not money Catherine. you'd make more panhandling

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #869,117

Porn Valley is located in the San Fernando Valley just north of Los Angeles and south of where Catherine lives.
Photography is somewhat important as I understand it. The film school could provide essential skills for Porn Valley jobs.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,119

@869,115 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

> Well, if we were stating that photography isn't a "job", which is what I did in the post you responded to, then there was a reason to make that distinction.
>
> If it's work one does for money then it's a job.
>
> Either way, this would be side work, I'm searching for a job right now.
>
>
> I'll probably go on social media and see if anybody could use someone to take pictures. I'll keep my rates low. Photos for $1 or $2.

Lol talk about pipe dream

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,124

@previous (G)
> Lol talk about pipe dream

As compared to say someone here who spent several years in school to learn to cook - Discovered that is tough to make money to survive - Then he spent 15 years to get a masters degree in languages. Failed to make it to PhD program which is the only way to make any money with such a degree. So now with all those years in school he cannot find work.

Pipe dreams may lead to survival skills. Cathy needs to get on with it - Something because she ain't getting younger

Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,125

@previous (Syntax)
You sure are obsessed with Matt.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,126

@previous (Syntax)

Syntax double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,128

@869,125 (Syntax)

1: He is a Pedophile

2: Making fun of his failure is frankly Fun

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,129

@previous (Syntax)
It is called obsession. What’s it been now, 25 years?

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,131

@previous (Syntax)
1994/95 era

Back then he spammed his Scat obsession and jammed up multiple forums - You will notice his Scat is still where he is at when it comes to sex
Then I discovered his Pedophile nature and of course everyone here is well aware of him trying to get a 15 year old girl to send him nude shots of her rear parts

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,134

@869,124 (Syntax)
obsessed

@869,115 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

> Either way, this would be side work, I'm searching for a job right now.
oh yeah. no you aren't. you're daydreaming

Anonymous E double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,135

@869,131 (Syntax)

> 1994/95 era
>
> Back then he spammed his Scat obsession and jammed up multiple forums - You will notice his Scat is still where he is at when it comes to sex
> Then I discovered his Pedophile nature and of course everyone here is well aware of him trying to get a 15 year old girl to send him nude shots of her rear parts

you've been following him since 94? get
a better hobby

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,136

@869,134 (E)
Not really, I'm making plans. I'm slowly moving out of the phase of dreaming and into the realm of wanting to make those dreams a reality.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,137

@869,135 (E)
er how many years have you been using mc? Does that mean because you use mc you are following Me? That wood mean with your logic you are obsessed with thee.

You can C Y this kinda logic fails

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,138

@869,131 (Syntax)
Wait, what the fuck? You and Matt knew each other since before this site existed?

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,139

@869,137 (Syntax)

> er how many years have you been using mc? Does that mean because you use mc you are following Me? That wood mean with your logic you are obsessed with thee.
>
> You can C Y this kinda logic fails

matt was here for years before you showed up

Anonymous E double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,140

@869,138 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
yeah the 25 years thing is not a joke. syntax is a dedicated stalker

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,141

@869,139 (E)
Nope. You can find me here going back to when I used a different Moniker during the first year of this sites existence

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,142

@previous (Syntax)
t4c?

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,143

@previous (E)
Yea
And thanks for getting me to test out mc with one of my former monikers - Skimming search ends up somewhat funny and somewhat not so funny

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,144

@previous (Syntax)
Then why didn't you type like a retard back then? retard

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,145

@869,138 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Apparently he has been stalking Matt since 1994.

Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,146

@869,144 (E)
er based on my posts back 8 years ago - I apparently now use speling check more often NOW
Back then not so much

Syntax double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #869,147

@869,138 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Indeed. When you see the words Bianca - That is him as anon or with one of his many many monikers
1994-1995 era

Back then he was proud of his Scat nature - None of that has changed Except Mods keep him limited but I now notice he tried to get away with the poop and worse more often until they catch him at it again

Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #869,166

@869,136 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

Pitiable

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #869,188

@869,092 (B)
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.