Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Malcolm X

Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #72,314

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgNk4LzbIw

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #866,748

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,750

Nigger

Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,753

a Chinese is a “yellow man” and he has nothing to do — or no connection whatsoever — with the name “Murphy”. And if it doesn’t look proper for a person who is yellow — or Chinese — to be walking around named Murphy, or Jones, or Johnson — or Bunche or Powell — I think it would be just as improper for a black person, or the so-called “negro” as we’re taught by the Honorable Elijah Muhammad to walk around with these names. And therefore he teaches us, during slavery the same slave-master who owned us put his last name on us to denote that we were his property. So when you see a negro today who’s named “Johnson”, if you go back in his history you’ll find he was once his grandfather — or one of his fore-fathers — was owned by a white man whose was named Johnson. If his name is “Bunche”, his grandfather was owned by a white man that was named Bunche.

He's got a point.

I've never seen video of Malcolm X before and I actually really find him very persuasive.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,759

@previous (Meta)
White boy White boy saying things I can't say in my white voice white noise

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,764

@previous (D)

Lance Goodthrust !ADRbYNVg1k joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,765

@866,753 (Meta)
He is 100% right on that point.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,766

@866,753 (Meta)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bQ1BX3hz7I

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #866,768

@866,753 (Meta)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-3p6QsCbr0

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,777

@866,765 (Lance Goodthrust !ADRbYNVg1k)
As a French-Spanish-African-Indian-Chinese man, you should legally change your name to Patrick Murphy.

Thanks.

Lance Goodthrust !ADRbYNVg1k replied with this 8 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,779

@previous (Meta)
You must have the wrong person.

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,781

@previous (Lance Goodthrust !ADRbYNVg1k)
Oh, sorry I was thinking about this other guy whom is not you at all.

My bad, new forum user!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,793

@866,779 (Lance Goodthrust !ADRbYNVg1k)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,794

Is he Malcolm X in the Roman sense? Were there Malcolms I to IX?

(Edited 9 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #866,795

@previous (F)

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #866,805

he was a gentleman among popes, the tenth of the Malcoms
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.