Topic: You get to delete one and only one word from the English language.
Meta started this discussion 8 years ago #72,165
What is it?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 46 seconds later[^] [v] #865,009
Meta
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #865,012
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #865,017
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #865,021
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 30 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #865,023
the cat is gonna take a shower and .... jerk off
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #865,045
@OP
Is it one word specifically or do different forms of the same word count too?
If I remove the verb "to be" can people still say is, are, was, were, etc. or do they just stop saying the word "be" while still being free to use all the other forms?
And what about homonyms? If I remove the verb "duck" can people still talk about ducks as a noun?
Is it one word specifically or do different forms of the same word count too?
If I remove the verb "to be" can people still say is, are, was, were, etc. or do they just stop saying the word "be" while still being free to use all the other forms?
And what about homonyms? If I remove the verb "duck" can people still talk about ducks as a noun?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #865,046
meme
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,051
“poopoo”
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,064
Salve
16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,130
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,133
Draad..
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 8 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,180
@865,021 (E)> >
>
> What the fuck is this supposed to mean
> Topic: You get to delete one and only one word from the English language.
Clearly you must be blind.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,183
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,185
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
If Draad gets used enough, the Oxford dictionary will make it an English word
Currently I C it's still a Dutch word. That is the country where they still train young people to stick thumbs in dikes.
They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
If Draad gets used enough, the Oxford dictionary will make it an English word
Currently I C it's still a Dutch word. That is the country where they still train young people to stick thumbs in dikes.
They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 43 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,186
@previous (Syntax)
> If Draad gets used enough, the Oxford dictionary will make it an English word
>
> Currently I C it's still a Dutch word. That is the country where they still train young people to stick thumbs in dikes.
> They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
kys
> If Draad gets used enough, the Oxford dictionary will make it an English word
>
> Currently I C it's still a Dutch word. That is the country where they still train young people to stick thumbs in dikes.
> They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
kys
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,193
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 8 years ago, 22 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,199
@865,185 (Syntax)
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to women. As much as you post naked pics of them, I'd think you should understand that.
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to women. As much as you post naked pics of them, I'd think you should understand that.
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,200
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,282
@previous (Syntax)
> They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
> They on the other hand have not been able to reduce homosexuality among the females.
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 54 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,288
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I'm shocked and more than a little impressed that you actually made it all the way through a syntax post to reference something at the end. I usually stop after the first sentence.
I'm shocked and more than a little impressed that you actually made it all the way through a syntax post to reference something at the end. I usually stop after the first sentence.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #865,302
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 8 years ago, 48 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #865,321
@865,288 (F)
I usually only skip them if they take up at least half of my screen.
I usually only skip them if they take up at least half of my screen.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)