Topic: Mr Cruz, who had links with a white supremacist group,
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #72,000
Yeah. He posted on 4chan a few times so this is the narrative. Evil whites even though he's Mexican.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #863,555
Mass shootings are mostly a white guy crime, so no big surprise that he identifies as a white guy.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 31 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #863,565
He attended a paramilitary training exercise run by a white supremacist militia. He probably also posted on 4chan and the_donald
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #863,566
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That’s true.
I also think reasonable people see he is a mentally ill fuck up who reacted to losing his family with extreme violence.
I don’t see how his weird political leanings influenced the attack tbh.
That’s true.
I also think reasonable people see he is a mentally ill fuck up who reacted to losing his family with extreme violence.
I don’t see how his weird political leanings influenced the attack tbh.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #863,572
@previous (D)
Wow, that's like coming out after the Boston bombings and saying those kids were mentally ill fuck-ups who just happened to be really interested in radical Islam and all those training videos and attempts to join radical Islamic militants were probably totally unrelated to violent actions they chose to take.
I'm sure you're right though. All those weird political leanings and that paramilitary training probably had nothing to do the choices Cruz made. It's probably not about guns either.
Wow, that's like coming out after the Boston bombings and saying those kids were mentally ill fuck-ups who just happened to be really interested in radical Islam and all those training videos and attempts to join radical Islamic militants were probably totally unrelated to violent actions they chose to take.
I'm sure you're right though. All those weird political leanings and that paramilitary training probably had nothing to do the choices Cruz made. It's probably not about guns either.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #863,579
@previous (B)
It’s in the interest of Islamic terrorists to blow up Bostonians.
White nationalists are not advantaged by slaughtering children. I wouldn’t be surprised if something similar happens again, but that’s because online white supremacy actively targets weird alienated white kids no one likes, not because they’re motivating the aforementioned weirdos to shoot up their peers.
It’s in the interest of Islamic terrorists to blow up Bostonians.
White nationalists are not advantaged by slaughtering children. I wouldn’t be surprised if something similar happens again, but that’s because online white supremacy actively targets weird alienated white kids no one likes, not because they’re motivating the aforementioned weirdos to shoot up their peers.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,603
@previous (D)
> It’s in the interest of Islamic terrorists to blow up Bostonians.
Not in any direct sense, no.
> White nationalists are not advantaged by slaughtering children.
I'm sure Anders Breivik, Eric Harris, and Dylan Klebold all agree. Yet white supremacists have a strong tendency to wander into predominately black churches, Sikh temples, and schools and start shooting people regardless of age. And there is definitely more motivation there beyond terrorizing innocent bystanders.
> that’s because online white supremacy actively targets weird alienated white kids no one likes
Sure. The same way radical Islam or any other violent movement targets alienated and violent young men.
> not because they’re motivating the aforementioned weirdos to shoot up their peers
You don't think targeting alienated kids and encouraging their violence and hatred of the other is a problem? That seems like you're being dismissive of the problem to the point of blindness.
> It’s in the interest of Islamic terrorists to blow up Bostonians.
Not in any direct sense, no.
> White nationalists are not advantaged by slaughtering children.
I'm sure Anders Breivik, Eric Harris, and Dylan Klebold all agree. Yet white supremacists have a strong tendency to wander into predominately black churches, Sikh temples, and schools and start shooting people regardless of age. And there is definitely more motivation there beyond terrorizing innocent bystanders.
> that’s because online white supremacy actively targets weird alienated white kids no one likes
Sure. The same way radical Islam or any other violent movement targets alienated and violent young men.
> not because they’re motivating the aforementioned weirdos to shoot up their peers
You don't think targeting alienated kids and encouraging their violence and hatred of the other is a problem? That seems like you're being dismissive of the problem to the point of blindness.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,606
@previous (B)
i would like to see the actual numbers, like in a graph
people killed by radical islam and white supremacy in the last 10 years
i would like to see the actual numbers, like in a graph
people killed by radical islam and white supremacy in the last 10 years
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,611
@previous (E)
Then have fun looking that up.
I'm saying they are both movements that recruit young men into violence and that pretending one is a threat and one isn't is silly.
Then have fun looking that up.
I'm saying they are both movements that recruit young men into violence and that pretending one is a threat and one isn't is silly.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,613
@previous (B)
it is silly
they're different magnitudes though
one is an ideology pretending to be a religion
with its own legal system where the goal seems to be to make as many children as possible
the other are usually small fringe groups who're no global threat, just look at kkk membership numbers
anyways, its fun to debate shit on the internet, isnt it?
it is silly
they're different magnitudes though
one is an ideology pretending to be a religion
with its own legal system where the goal seems to be to make as many children as possible
the other are usually small fringe groups who're no global threat, just look at kkk membership numbers
anyways, its fun to debate shit on the internet, isnt it?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,627
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,630
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 38 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,665
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,669
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
cuz that news story is sticky there
its ok to browse t_d kook
they will give you a coat and some bricks
cuz that news story is sticky there
its ok to browse t_d kook
they will give you a coat and some bricks
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,673
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,681
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,684
Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,695
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,700
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,706
harblcopter !4.oaQPPovQ joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,713
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,722
@863,681 (B)
Also the shirt is "Communism: It's a party". It's a shirt I'd own because it's funny but I'm not antifa/a socialist/communist.
Also the shirt is "Communism: It's a party". It's a shirt I'd own because it's funny but I'm not antifa/a socialist/communist.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,736
@863,603 (B)
Do you have a point?
You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
Do you have a point?
You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 18 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,745
@previous (D)
> Do you have a point?
Yes, disregarding his participation in violent ideologies as a factor in his behavior is shortsighted. At worst, it is being an apologist for violent white nationalism.
> You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
Did you mean opinionated?
> Do you have a point?
Yes, disregarding his participation in violent ideologies as a factor in his behavior is shortsighted. At worst, it is being an apologist for violent white nationalism.
> You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
Did you mean opinionated?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,750
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #863,751
@863,736 (D)
> Do you have a point?
>
> You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
you are a bad person and need to not be bad
> Do you have a point?
>
> You’re very opiniated for someone incapable of clearly communicating their thoughts.
you are a bad person and need to not be bad
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #863,951
Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist and anon B is a big baby cuck.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #863,954
@previous (D)
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist
No, I'm sure violent extremist posts that earn you the attention of the FBI and worry fellow students are totally normal.
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist
Mature.
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist
No, I'm sure violent extremist posts that earn you the attention of the FBI and worry fellow students are totally normal.
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist
Mature.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #864,031
@863,951 (D)
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist and anon B is a big baby cuck.
so you knew him in your white nationalist club and he told you that he was only in it to get chicks
> Update: he wasn’t a white nationalist and anon B is a big baby cuck.
so you knew him in your white nationalist club and he told you that he was only in it to get chicks
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #864,047
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
I don’t think dweeb paramilitary groups attract that many women.
In all seriousness the kid is fucked up and trying to use a partisan perspective to tell the narrative cheapens the tragedy. The video and audio from the students told the story, and it was horrifying. If you have any empathy you could see what it was like inside.
Rather than focusing on the story itself the media class is using the deaths of terrified children to push for their preferred legislative agenda.
That’s weird. Don’t participate in it.
I don’t think dweeb paramilitary groups attract that many women.
In all seriousness the kid is fucked up and trying to use a partisan perspective to tell the narrative cheapens the tragedy. The video and audio from the students told the story, and it was horrifying. If you have any empathy you could see what it was like inside.
Rather than focusing on the story itself the media class is using the deaths of terrified children to push for their preferred legislative agenda.
That’s weird. Don’t participate in it.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #864,053
@previous (D)
> I don’t think dweeb paramilitary groups attract that many women.
>
> In all seriousness the kid is fucked up and trying to use a partisan perspective to tell the narrative cheapens the tragedy. The video and audio from the students told the story, and it was horrifying. If you have any empathy you could see what it was like inside.
>
> Rather than focusing on the story itself the media class is using the deaths of terrified children to push for their preferred legislative agenda.
>
> That’s weird. Don’t participate in it.
what the fuck are you talking about
> I don’t think dweeb paramilitary groups attract that many women.
>
> In all seriousness the kid is fucked up and trying to use a partisan perspective to tell the narrative cheapens the tragedy. The video and audio from the students told the story, and it was horrifying. If you have any empathy you could see what it was like inside.
>
> Rather than focusing on the story itself the media class is using the deaths of terrified children to push for their preferred legislative agenda.
>
> That’s weird. Don’t participate in it.
what the fuck are you talking about
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #864,054
@864,047 (D)
So... let's just grieve it out instead of discussing why these shootings happen so regularly in this country. got it. those poor children
So... let's just grieve it out instead of discussing why these shootings happen so regularly in this country. got it. those poor children