Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
sexual aerosol !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#125,751
Niggerphilia
!poISOnioxc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^][v]#125,753
They're both fucked up. What are your thoughts, OP?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^][v]#125,755
bestiality is hot.
necrophilia is just gross.
Meowth joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,756
Bestiality. At least necrophilia involves two humans...
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,761
I don't know, necrophilia is pretty fucked up. A rat will fuck a lot of things, but a rat will not fuck another dead rat.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,763
@125,753 (!poISOnioxc)
Bestiality is worse, IMO, because it's an unnatural attraction. Assuming that the body is fresh, it's really just like regular unconscious rape.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,764
Neither is bad.
Meowth replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,766
@125,763 (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6) Meowth gave you Sitrus Berry to hold.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,767
@125,764 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6) > Persona ever so hard.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,769
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,792
@125,785 (!poISOnioxc)
Sure it does, but the thought of fucking an animal is a lot worse.
Katerina Shcherbatskaya replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,804
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
Unless you meant to ask "Would you rather commit bestiality or necrophilia?", the yuck factor shouldn't even matter.
Meowth replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,807
I almost popped a boner at the sight of a dead girl. I felt bad and immediately left the page.
green joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,813
Sex with dead animals.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,816
@125,804 (Katerina Shcherbatskaya)
Allow me to rephrase. "I consider the act of fucking an animal to be a lot worse."
Marsden Miller replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#125,821
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
Dead Animal no way. Dead humans male or female Yes the best.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,856
@125,764 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Bad is not really the right word here.
Neither of these harms a person or violates their rights.
However we must consider animal rights (if we believe in such a concept) and property rights to the dead body (if we believe in such a concept).
Marsden Miller replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,860
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I said live when I do them, and leave them dead. No one wants the animal alive to bear witness.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,864
@125,856 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
And now we go to a previous conversation. No rights. :D
Meowth replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,867
MonkeyRapesFrog.flv
Marsden Miller replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,871
@previous (Meowth)
Monkeys usually live in zoos behind bars. Soon I will be as well. I would do a monkey any day. I speak monkey and if they were raised in Mexico, that works out best for me.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#125,877
@125,864 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Yes, but that is a horrible view. It is view that all are not created equal.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,890
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
People aren't created equal. Some are smarter than others. Some are stronger than others.
If anything, this view serves for people to better themselves mentally and physically, rather than hiding behind "everyone's equal!"
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,909
If they are dead, then they can't say no.
LeggoMyEggo !TSQPWxnSxE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,970
@125,890 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
You really need to take a reality check and drop this nihilist worldview hun.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,976
Seriously 3 to 13?
An animal is alive. It's not the worst thing in the world, but it actually feels something. A dead person doesn't give a single fuck.
LeggoMyEggo !TSQPWxnSxE replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,978
@previous (N)
I don't think a female sheep or horse really suffers any physical pain from a human's tiny dick.
Ronabe joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,979
actually in your theory, the strong take from the smart. progress is retarded. evil prospers while good languishes.
only in a rights based systems do people need to do things for themselves, or with the consent of others.
no one claims that everyone's output or abilities are equal: rather that their rights are equal. this prevents murder theft and rape, which most people consider negative activities.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#125,988
@125,978 (LeggoMyEggo !TSQPWxnSxE)
Sure, but it may cause some uncomfort. and there are other animals that may feel uncomfortable, or in pain.
A corpse, never gives even a little bit.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#126,006
@125,970 (LeggoMyEggo !TSQPWxnSxE)
I like my delusions, thanks.
@125,979 (Ronabe)
The smart can defend themselves from the strong.
Why would people with unequal output have equal rights?
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,336
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Not necessarily, but the rich can defend themselves from the poor. This has nothing to do with ability or output, merely capital.
Rights are not based upon "output"; rather, they are "self-evident"; "sacred and undeniable" etc (to quote the founding fathers). The principle of rights is that life comes with rights. They are not earned, but are inherent.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,473
@125,764 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
This is by far the dumbest and most facepalm worthy thing I've ever seen you post. Congratulations. @OP
Beastiality for sure, especially in cases where men are full fledged going at the animals. Most animals simply aren't made for that, and I'd imagine it being extremely painful in most cases. As for the cases where women have intercourse with animals, well, that's certainly not okay but at least the animals are not being hurt. Of course this is way less common.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,543
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,570
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
No really. You're just naive, I guess.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,576
@previous (P)
I suppose.
I don't see why people can't just do what they want, though...
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,582
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
(Assuming you're speaking generally...) if people could do whatever the hell they wanted, there would be global chaos. Laws exist for a reason. As for the topic at hand, both beastiality and necrophilia are just not okay. Beastiality is harmful and abusive to animals, and necrophilia are just downright disrespectful. If your best friend or a close relative of yours passed away and someone had relations with their corpse, you can't say you'd be okay with that. In several years you might look back on the statement you made here @125,764, (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6) and I promise that if you do, you will also facepalm.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
benny !gmy5qXGyiE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,587
homosexuality
Katerina Shcherbatskaya replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,589
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,596
@128,582 (P)
See @128,589 (Katerina Shcherbatskaya)
Eating meat is also harmful and abusive to animals~
Necrophilia...That's rather subjective.
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,600
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Although that is a terrible fucking comparison, it's still a semi-valid point. Regardless, you still are ignoring the points I made here @128,582 (P)
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,611
@previous (P)
What's wrong with chaos?
...So having sex with an animal is worse than killing and eating it?
As for your points about disrespect, completely subjective.
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,616
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
A lot is wrong with chaos. If people could do whatever they liked without any type of repercussions (I'm assuming that's what you were implying) there would likely be more people running the streets robbing, murdering, and raping than there already are now. > ...So having sex with an animal is worse than killing and eating it?
They're both equally terrible things, but having sex with animals is worse in my opinion. I do agree that killing animals when it's not necessary is totally fucked, but it's a reality that isn't going to change. Having sex with animals is something that is thankfully outlawed, and for very good reasons. It's just wrong. Imagine this scenario: A totally hung dude has intercourse with a small animal. That poor thing is going to be ripped to shreds. You're okay with that? Ridiculous. > As for your points about disrespect, completely subjective.
True, but that doesn't make it any more okay. Again, I ask you, if a close friend or relative of yours passes away and some person decides to have their way with their corpse, you'd be okay with that then? Hm?
r04r joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,617
@128,611 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Stop for a moment and activate brain-mode.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,618
@128,616 (P)
There would be repercussions, just not inflicted by the courts.
It would cause people to get smarter and stronger. Force them to, really, but still.
Well, that's more rape than sex. I'm sure a Great Dane can accommodate a man.
Again, subjective.
And I'm sure that whoever decided to have their way with the corpse would be smart enough to not make it completely obvious. What they don't know can't hurt them~
@previous (r04r)
no u
Too tired to activate brain-mode.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#128,697
I'm absolutely with the bestiality-is-worse-than-necrophilia camp. To me, and this is assuming most of us are voting honestly, it's a little disconcerting that the current results actually favour bestiality. In the case of necrophilia, the victim cannot be harmed. They're fucking dead. I'm sure, if the deceased's family and friends found out about it, they'd be repulsed. But that's irrelevant. Bestiality, in contirast, has not only the potential, but probability to be hurtful. There is actually a life at risk. No person should be allowed to be so selfish as to place their needs for sexual gratification over the well-being of another life, whether that life belongs to a man or a horse.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#129,078
@previous (S)
A distinction between human and animal life is necessary in civilized society.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#129,085
@128,618 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
History (or even just a look on the evening news) has shown the opposite. Humans and society declines when consent and contracts are not upheld by an independent judiciary.
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#129,090
> >mfw when re: trolley car dilemma you flick the switch to kill a man and save two mice
Again, implying the man's more deserving of life, lol.
The root cause of all the world's problems are almost all human-caused. Man is selfish, brutish, and arrogant. Animals, however, do not possess these characteristics.
I'd choose to kill a man over a mouse anyday.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#129,138
@129,132 (Nega !aEp48yJmng)
You're a miserable pile of lies, Nega.
> Lol all the worlds problems? such as?
You can't identify even one of the world's problems on your own? How about rape, murder, war, theft, fraud, toxic emissions, government corruption, etc. etc. etc. > Lol you are revealed as a troll by saying animals are not selfish or brutish LOL
And you're exposing your fragile nature by taking extreme offence to the suggestion that animals>humans. I detect some high defensiveness here! > Fortunately you will go to jail, while I will kill pests with impunity!
I never said I'd kill anyone. :P I said, given the choice, I'd take a human life over one of an animal. (inb4 semantics argument)
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#129,150