Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Social justice has boiled down to this.

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw started this discussion 8 years ago #71,866

This is what's left at the bottom of the pot.

Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #862,394

Is "PoC can't be racist because they don't have privilege" still a thing?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #862,414

@previous (Meta)
that's not what reverse racism is

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,438

@862,394 (Meta)
Yes its still a thing

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,440

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Kook

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,442

@previous (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)

> Kook

Wat?

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,456

@862,414 (C)

> that's not what reverse racism is

I know I just wondered if it's still a thing.

Can PoC be sexist/homophobic?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,457

@previous (Meta)
...yes?

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,458

@862,456 (Meta)
I don't know anyone who says that they can't

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,459

@862,456 (Meta)
yes especially the japanese

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,461

@862,458 (C)
People say that pocs cant be racist because racism implies systematic oppression. They can be discriminatory.

Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,463

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
[who?]

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,464

@previous (F)

> [who?]

I dont know. I've seen it all over the internet. Start typing racism is systematic oppression and hit images and you'll likely find examples

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,465

@862,461 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
@862,461 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> People say that pocs cant be racist because racism implies systematic oppression. They can be discriminatory.

I've heard people assert that "pocs" can't be racist towards white people but never that they couldn't be racist. the "discriminatory" thing just seems like an unnecessary distinction

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,468

@previous (C)
I see no difference

harblcopter !4.oaQPPovQ joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,469

racism is a holdover from tribal society and it has served us well thus far

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,473

@862,468 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Kook

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,479

you don't have to be racist...but it helps

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,480

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,482

@862,473 (H)
What?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,484

@OP
it'll make a great slogan for the Democrats, and they can base all of their policies on it.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 39 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,485

> gender is a social construct
> you can not be racist towards white people even though you judge them based on the color of their skin
> you are a transphobic fucktard you don't want to date a girl that used to be a guy
> in canada your kids can be taken away if some teacher thinks your little kid is trans and you disagree (http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479)

Anonymous L double-posted this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,486

@previous (L)
oh, i forgot oregon
where its now legal to get an abortion the full 9 months
even for something trivial like gender
(something the people who want these laws claim doesn't exist)

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,503

@862,461 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> People say that pocs cant be racist because racism implies systematic oppression. They can be discriminatory.
People do say that but it doesn't make it any less wrong

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,504

it's also become common to refer to citizens of the americas as "settlers" regardless of being born there, if they aren't apache or some shit like that

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,562

@862,457 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
@862,458 (C)
I remember it as "racism=power+prejudice" PoC don't have power so they cannot, by definition be racist. So when Ninjj says "I hate white people" it's not racist because he doesn't have power for example.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,565

@previous (Meta)
that would result in it being impossible for poc to be racist to white people
racism between different groups of poc is prevalent

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,567

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Even that is white people's fault.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,571

@862,503 (M)
I agree

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,573

@862,567 (Meta)
you're good at boiling things down until all nuance is lost and they are meaningless

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,652

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I prefer to think of it as "seeing through bullshit".

Thanks ?

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #862,653

@862,573 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> boiling things down until all nuance is lost

Don't call it a scarecrow argument, because that's racist.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #862,784

@862,573 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
it's his schtick

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #862,860

@previous (C)
i know :(
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.