Topic: Pedosexual is as much of a word as Gastronomy
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #717
> the art or law of regulating the stomach
A load of shit. Get back to me when you can model taste in a generative fashion. Thanks.
A load of shit. Get back to me when you can model taste in a generative fashion. Thanks.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later[^] [v] #13,861
Shitlist OP.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 37 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #13,862
Gastronomy is indeed a word, you mora. It refers to the art of cuisine.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,874
@previous (Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih)
Pedosexual is indeed a word, you mora. It refers to the legitimate sexual love of children.
Pedosexual is indeed a word, you mora. It refers to the legitimate sexual love of children.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,876
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,877
@13,874 (A)
Gastronomy really is a word that has been around for a long time. The esteemed dictionary LaRousse makes an entire volume called Gastronomy.
Gastronomy really is a word that has been around for a long time. The esteemed dictionary LaRousse makes an entire volume called Gastronomy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,881
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,885
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,887
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,888
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,894
Pedosexual is a legitimate construct, as is gastronomy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,898
@previous (D)
Hi jump. If you held the exact opposite belief you might even be accepted by society. You'd certainly lose weight.
Hi jump. If you held the exact opposite belief you might even be accepted by society. You'd certainly lose weight.
jump !59AkbuTs8U replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #13,919
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #14,053
pedophilia = child love
pedosexual = child sex
pedosexual = child sex
jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,117
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,147
@14,053 (E)
the original term was "pedophilia erotica" ie erotic child love
child love is natural. humans are designed to find children cute and to want to protect them
i think pedosexual is a good term as it conforms with other terms such as homosexual and heterosexual
@previous (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
lol
the original term was "pedophilia erotica" ie erotic child love
child love is natural. humans are designed to find children cute and to want to protect them
i think pedosexual is a good term as it conforms with other terms such as homosexual and heterosexual
@previous (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
lol
Ninjj !nuPIzzAD4Y joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,152
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,161
@14,147 (D)
> the original term was "pedophilia erotica" ie erotic child love
Quite unwieldy, wouldn't you agree?
> child love is natural. humans are designed to find children cute and to want to protect them
You speak true.
> i think pedosexual is a good term as it conforms with other terms such as homosexual and heterosexual
All that matters are the meanings behind the words, not the words themselves.
Calling it *philia doesn't make it immoral, and calling it *sexuality doesn't make it acceptable, you see?
> the original term was "pedophilia erotica" ie erotic child love
Quite unwieldy, wouldn't you agree?
> child love is natural. humans are designed to find children cute and to want to protect them
You speak true.
> i think pedosexual is a good term as it conforms with other terms such as homosexual and heterosexual
All that matters are the meanings behind the words, not the words themselves.
Calling it *philia doesn't make it immoral, and calling it *sexuality doesn't make it acceptable, you see?
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,164
@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
I prefer accuracy. Why not shorten every word to the first 3 letters of that word? we cou typ lik thi and it wou sav hea of tim. But it is ambiguous and inaccurate. I much prefer the exact and accurate term pedophilia erotica.
But it is from the words themselves that we gain meaning. Very few words are just arbitrarily made and assigned a meaning. Most words are formed out of words from historic languages.
I agree with your final statement but am somewhat confused by it because I never claimed such a thing. I claimed that "pedophile" is a positive word used negatively. "Pedophilia erotica" is what people mean. I propose using "pedosexual" as a less "unwieldy" way of saying pedophilia erotica as it conforms to other words related to sexual attractions.
I prefer accuracy. Why not shorten every word to the first 3 letters of that word? we cou typ lik thi and it wou sav hea of tim. But it is ambiguous and inaccurate. I much prefer the exact and accurate term pedophilia erotica.
But it is from the words themselves that we gain meaning. Very few words are just arbitrarily made and assigned a meaning. Most words are formed out of words from historic languages.
I agree with your final statement but am somewhat confused by it because I never claimed such a thing. I claimed that "pedophile" is a positive word used negatively. "Pedophilia erotica" is what people mean. I propose using "pedosexual" as a less "unwieldy" way of saying pedophilia erotica as it conforms to other words related to sexual attractions.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,170
@previous (D)
> I prefer accuracy.
As do I, but it's an unrealistic thing to expect of others.
> Why not shorten every word to the first 3 letters of that word? we cou typ lik thi and it wou sav hea of tim. But it is ambiguous and inaccurate. I much prefer the exact and accurate term pedophilia erotica.
LoL.
>
> But it is from the words themselves that we gain meaning. Very few words are just arbitrarily made and assigned a meaning. Most words are formed out of words from historic languages.
It's not a one-way process by any means.
> I agree with your final statement but am somewhat confused by it because I never claimed such a thing. I claimed that "pedophile" is a positive word used negatively.
So you propose we "make space" for the true meaning of a word that contains "love" by using another one?
Not such a bad idea, come to think of it.
> "Pedophilia erotica" is what people mean. I propose using "pedosexual" as a less "unwieldy" way of saying pedophilia erotica as it conforms to other words related to sexual attractions.
The problem here is the "taint" it has by being used by the "pedopride" faction...
> I prefer accuracy.
As do I, but it's an unrealistic thing to expect of others.
> Why not shorten every word to the first 3 letters of that word? we cou typ lik thi and it wou sav hea of tim. But it is ambiguous and inaccurate. I much prefer the exact and accurate term pedophilia erotica.
LoL.
>
> But it is from the words themselves that we gain meaning. Very few words are just arbitrarily made and assigned a meaning. Most words are formed out of words from historic languages.
It's not a one-way process by any means.
> I agree with your final statement but am somewhat confused by it because I never claimed such a thing. I claimed that "pedophile" is a positive word used negatively.
So you propose we "make space" for the true meaning of a word that contains "love" by using another one?
Not such a bad idea, come to think of it.
> "Pedophilia erotica" is what people mean. I propose using "pedosexual" as a less "unwieldy" way of saying pedophilia erotica as it conforms to other words related to sexual attractions.
The problem here is the "taint" it has by being used by the "pedopride" faction...
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #14,185
@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
We do not change our expectations of others based upon whether we think they will meet them or not.
We have ideals, ethics, morals, &c. &c. These are not concrete; these are abstract, existing only in the realm of ideals. This realm is untouched by the concrete world and can not be touched by it. It is reached through logic and reasoning.
I believe the form of words is very important. I believe keeping words as close to their original meanings/etymologies as possible is of far greater value than spelling reform.
Not even make space but take back space! Pedosexual is a word with meaning (even if it unused) because it is made of parts that have meaning, whereby a person who had never seen the word before can (almost) know what it means (words generally have connotations, nuances, &c. that would be impossible to know without knowing the dialect and culture of the people speaking). Sdnlifygsauyg is not a word until someone gives it a meaning, then it will become a word (however, it may not even be correct to say that it is a word until it gains an amount of vulgar usage). Currently there is confusion - words with multiple, sometimes opposing, meanings. This is undesirable.
I have never heard anyone use the term pedosexual. How do they use it? To me it seems a more base and disgusting way of saying pedophile.I would think pedo-pride persons would be better off staying with the term pedophile, with it's implications of love and consensuality. Pedosexual seems to feed the idea that it is just about sex, which would surely be negative to their cause.
We do not change our expectations of others based upon whether we think they will meet them or not.
We have ideals, ethics, morals, &c. &c. These are not concrete; these are abstract, existing only in the realm of ideals. This realm is untouched by the concrete world and can not be touched by it. It is reached through logic and reasoning.
I believe the form of words is very important. I believe keeping words as close to their original meanings/etymologies as possible is of far greater value than spelling reform.
Not even make space but take back space! Pedosexual is a word with meaning (even if it unused) because it is made of parts that have meaning, whereby a person who had never seen the word before can (almost) know what it means (words generally have connotations, nuances, &c. that would be impossible to know without knowing the dialect and culture of the people speaking). Sdnlifygsauyg is not a word until someone gives it a meaning, then it will become a word (however, it may not even be correct to say that it is a word until it gains an amount of vulgar usage). Currently there is confusion - words with multiple, sometimes opposing, meanings. This is undesirable.
I have never heard anyone use the term pedosexual. How do they use it? To me it seems a more base and disgusting way of saying pedophile.I would think pedo-pride persons would be better off staying with the term pedophile, with it's implications of love and consensuality. Pedosexual seems to feed the idea that it is just about sex, which would surely be negative to their cause.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #15,866
@previous (D)
> Not even make space but take back space!
iamokaywiththis.jpg
> How do they use it?
They use it in an attempt to stand in the same line as Homosexuality, claiming that it is an orientation for which they are being unjustly persecuted.
Throw in some reductio ad Hitlerum and you get the picture. ;)
> To me it seems a more base and disgusting way of saying pedophile.I would think pedo-pride persons would be better off staying with the term pedophile, with it's implications of love and consensuality. Pedosexual seems to feed the idea that it is just about sex, which would surely be negative to their cause.
I've nothing to add to this line of reasoning.
I was pleasantly surprised by your wit and intelligence. ;)
> Not even make space but take back space!
iamokaywiththis.jpg
> How do they use it?
They use it in an attempt to stand in the same line as Homosexuality, claiming that it is an orientation for which they are being unjustly persecuted.
Throw in some reductio ad Hitlerum and you get the picture. ;)
> To me it seems a more base and disgusting way of saying pedophile.I would think pedo-pride persons would be better off staying with the term pedophile, with it's implications of love and consensuality. Pedosexual seems to feed the idea that it is just about sex, which would surely be negative to their cause.
I've nothing to add to this line of reasoning.
I was pleasantly surprised by your wit and intelligence. ;)
jump !VIfloDyEYo replied with this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #15,875
I prefer the term sexual predator. I feel like a hunter, so it seems appropriate.
jump !VIfloDyEYo double-posted this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #15,883
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
+ Enthusiast.
lol we joke about terrible things
+ Enthusiast.
lol we joke about terrible things
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #15,884
@15,866 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
> They use it in an attempt to stand in the same line as Homosexuality, claiming that it is an orientation for which they are being unjustly persecuted.
LOL
murdersexual, kleptosexual, raposexual ???
> They use it in an attempt to stand in the same line as Homosexuality, claiming that it is an orientation for which they are being unjustly persecuted.
LOL
murdersexual, kleptosexual, raposexual ???
jump !VIfloDyEYo replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #15,892
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #16,598
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #16,620
Gastronomy sounds like it should refer to the naming and differentiation of the parts and functions of the stomach. It is a silly word.
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #16,635
@OP
That tends to happen quite often.
That tends to happen quite often.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #16,638
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #17,157
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #17,341
@15,892 (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
I assumed he meant it was used by people attempting to legalize adult-child sex and that they were claiming their attraction gives them a right to act upon it.
I assumed he meant it was used by people attempting to legalize adult-child sex and that they were claiming their attraction gives them a right to act upon it.
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #17,367
Pedosexual
Pedo = foot
Sexual = reproducing
Pedosexuals are footfucks
Pedo = foot
Sexual = reproducing
Pedosexuals are footfucks
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #17,372
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #17,374
@16,598 (J)
You're only a pedo once it becomes illegal. Before that it's just "cute" childhood romance.
You're only a pedo once it becomes illegal. Before that it's just "cute" childhood romance.