Topic: New 3.8 billion year old fossils may challenge what we know about the start of Earth.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 8 years ago #71,255
The more I learn about science the more it brings me closer to understanding God's creation it feels like.
https://www.wired.com/story/35-billion-year-old-fossils-challenge-ideas-about-earths-start/
https://www.wired.com/story/35-billion-year-old-fossils-challenge-ideas-about-earths-start/
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #857,379
Yaaaawwwwwwwnnnnnnn
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #857,382
wow 35 billion, that actually does challenge what we know
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,444
You know they carbon dated a brand new piece of rock from a volcano and it came back as "billions of years old" and atheists still believe this fairytale shit ?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,445
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 48 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,455
> “All we can say is [Nutman’s rocks] look like stromatolites, and that’s very enticing.”
You can't tell me that the author wasn't snickering when she wrote out that quote.
You can't tell me that the author wasn't snickering when she wrote out that quote.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,458
@857,444 (D)
> You know they carbon dated a brand new piece of rock from a volcano and it came back as "billions of years old"
If its "billions of years old", then it can't be brand new. Thanks.
> You know they carbon dated a brand new piece of rock from a volcano and it came back as "billions of years old"
If its "billions of years old", then it can't be brand new. Thanks.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,470
> Gods creation?
According to the old testament the Earth was created 6000 years ago.
According to the old testament the Earth was created 6000 years ago.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,474
@previous (G)
That was written down and translated by man and man is imperfect so therefore the chance of mistakes are high.
That was written down and translated by man and man is imperfect so therefore the chance of mistakes are high.
16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,476
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
So you're admitting that nothing in the Bible should be taken at face value as fact?
So you're admitting that nothing in the Bible should be taken at face value as fact?
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,478
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,496
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,497
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,507
@857,476 (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
I'm saying that nobody could really speak for someone as powerful as God. All we can do is simply guess. Again, I'm not even claiming I speak for them, as I cannot possibly know what God's design is.
I'm saying that nobody could really speak for someone as powerful as God. All we can do is simply guess. Again, I'm not even claiming I speak for them, as I cannot possibly know what God's design is.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,508
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> I'm saying that nobody could really speak for someone as powerful as God. All we can do is simply guess. Again, I'm not even claiming I speak for them, as I cannot possibly know >what God's design is.
You cannot have it both ways.
1: God is so powerful God made you the opposite sex you end up wanting to be.
2: God according to you, designed you as a male.
3: You will counter with God provided a pill that will somewhat change some factors of your current body.
Frankly your God really fucked you over.
Thank God that God is not my God.
> I'm saying that nobody could really speak for someone as powerful as God. All we can do is simply guess. Again, I'm not even claiming I speak for them, as I cannot possibly know >what God's design is.
You cannot have it both ways.
1: God is so powerful God made you the opposite sex you end up wanting to be.
2: God according to you, designed you as a male.
3: You will counter with God provided a pill that will somewhat change some factors of your current body.
Frankly your God really fucked you over.
Thank God that God is not my God.
16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,510
@857,507 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Then how do you know God even exists if you know nothing about "him"?
Then how do you know God even exists if you know nothing about "him"?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,514
@857,445 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
not billions of years old rocks
@857,444 (D)
the half life of carbon-14 is only like 5,700 bro
not billions of years old rocks
@857,444 (D)
the half life of carbon-14 is only like 5,700 bro
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,515
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,516
the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by this process date to around 50,000 years ago, although special preparation methods occasionally permit accurate analysis of older samples.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 31 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,532
@857,444 (D)
You can only carbon date organics...ie not rocks. Also carbon dating isn't a valid method past a certain date (50 000? years ago)
But yeah rocks can't be carbon dated.
You can only carbon date organics...ie not rocks. Also carbon dating isn't a valid method past a certain date (50 000? years ago)
But yeah rocks can't be carbon dated.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 8 years ago, 38 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,569
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
With all your dating experience have you ever dated a rock?
How many of them were verified organics?
With all your dating experience have you ever dated a rock?
How many of them were verified organics?
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,571
Impossible seeing as the earth is only 6000 years old. The satanic scientists are trying to trick you.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 4 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,572
@857,569 (K)
we were talking about carbon dating in my prehistoric archaeology class and i made the carbon marriage joke
:')
we were talking about carbon dating in my prehistoric archaeology class and i made the carbon marriage joke
:')
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #857,573
