Topic: Stoic Thought of the Day (9th January)

Stoic Sam !zQ8ry.WSMk started this discussion 8 years ago #70,529

A gift doesn't consist of what has been done or the object given, but the intention of the giver or doer.

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #850,599

Sorry, that makes no fucking sense.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,600

@previous (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
He means to say.
Easy come easy go.

dw skg llc joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,616

@850,599 (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
yes it does

@previous (C)
no it doesn't

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 57 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,617

@previous (dw skg llc)
Stop harrassing me, bitch.

dw skg llc replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,619

@previous (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
you gon Git it

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,621

@previous (dw skg llc)

> you gon Git it

oof

Stoic Sam !zQ8ry.WSMk (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,638

@850,599 (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)

To quote a customary saying:

It's not the gift that matters, it's the thought behind it.

Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,640

@previous (Stoic Sam !zQ8ry.WSMk)
But there are some situations where this does not entirely apply.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 34 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,641

@850,638 (Stoic Sam !zQ8ry.WSMk)
As I so well said.
Easy come easy go.

dw skg llc replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,642

@previous (C)
that's not what he said

Stoic Sam !zQ8ry.WSMk (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,643

@850,640 (B)

It's not a replacement for the original Stoic Thought of the Day, just a generalism likely to conjure a memory of the sentiment.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,645

@850,642 (dw skg llc)
He did say
> it's the thought behind it.

So I said to self how many neurons are required to create a thought and I conclude that even less than a full neuron.
It would take only a single cell to create a conscious entity.

If one were a Christian? A gift might be as simple as a Thought

So again I conclude Easy come Easy go

dw skg llc replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,648

@previous (C)
i don't know how you are jumping to these conclusions

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,651

@previous (dw skg llc)
Albeit I am not a Christian, I can mind meld and conclude what a Christian wood conclude.

dw skg llc replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,652

@previous (C)
you're Jewish

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,654

@previous (dw skg llc)
Ex Jew. Makes it even more easy to mind meld and think as a Jesus the Jew2

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,657

@850,645 (C)

> So I said to self how many neurons are required to create a thought and I conclude that even less than a full neuron.
> It would take only a single cell to create a conscious entity.

That doesn't sound very scientific...

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,662

@previous (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
I double checked my conclusion using Google.

You are free to test such urself
> how many neurons are required to create a thought

Oh and the bridge to a Neuron is a single cell.

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,665

@previous (C)

> Oh and the bridge to a Neuron is a single cell.

No, the synapse is not a cell, it is a structure. It does not contain a nucleus.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,669

@previous (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
Dua pardon me for trying to make the bridge more simple.

However if you want to include that then let me modify my statement

So I said to self how many neurons are required to create a thought and I conclude that even less than a full neuron.
It would take only a snapse to create a conscious entity.

16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,672

@previous (C)
You really aren't making any sense. Please form your arguements more coherently, at least to the point where I can understand what you're trying to say, and then we can talk. Thanks.

Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,674

@previous (16bitch !BMhSp1fpyA)
Kid the last thing I have time for is trying to get you to understand me.

dw skg llc replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #850,679

@previous (C)
you are making less sense than usual tbh

Minichan