Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,455
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Because it is the original English, the accent sounds better, they pronounce all of the letters, and it is more elegant.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,462
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih double-posted this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,473
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
What I mean is that British English, is the original modern English.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih triple-posted this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,476
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
British people say veh-geh-tuh-bull
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih quadruple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,478
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I mean, English came from England. Of all modern English, it is the first English.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih quintuple-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,483
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
So, American English existed before British English?
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,487
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
British English existed before American English.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,488
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
She clearly pronounced every letter.
advi !FurFagCd.2 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,491
i'm used to american english, switching to british would be like switching from qwerty to dvorak
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#13,508
@previous (advi !FurFagCd.2)
which is an impossible feat without taping a key layout to your monitor.
I tried.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,514
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
YOu know what I mean.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,530
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Shakespeare would be perplexed by this board.
lol
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,536
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
No lol what I mean is that the English language developed historically in England, and its other forms today are due to the English colonising other countries.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih double-posted this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,539
@13,530 (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
To boob, or not to boob?
That is the boobie.
Whether is nobler to suck on a tit,
And suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous nipple,
Or, to motorboat the tits, and thus, to laugh!
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,540
...I'd like to see Shakespeare confronted by someone who speaks ebonics.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,548
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I love youâ„¢ code slave
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,564
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Oh, dear. Sorry to hear. Is GHOULwikiâ„¢ still screwed?
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,578
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.) > So you are claiming the language of chavs is the original English?
It is.
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,588
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
What do I need to do??? Just say the word!
Kody R. Bear„¢ !!F0+vKzoih double-posted this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#13,610
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
huh??
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#13,937
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I disagree extremely. I see no benefit to spelling simplification, but the loss of obvious etymologies would be very detrimental IMO. I use a mix of both systems.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#13,947
What's known today as "British English" has many changes that didn't exist, and still don't exist, in American English. Some Britons will swear up and down that certain English words were first used in England when, in fact, the opposite is the truth.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,237
> I was asking if that was the something else you learned at school
I learned that punctuation is not to be played with. ;-)
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,392
I have no preference; I use whichever keys my fingers hit. If there's a u, there's a u. If not, who gives a fuck? It's a letter.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 44 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,417
@previous (S)
ltol ie tortally afgree whoe cakres abouyt addintg ae singxle lettier tro aq wodrd!!!
Anonymous N double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,418
@14,385 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
i learned that horizontal smilies aren't a toy bud, grow up and vertical ^_~v
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,481
we forgotten that we forgot. lol
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,681
Why the fuck would anyone prefer British English over American English? There's a reason American English is called International English.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,684
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4) > There's a reason American English is called International English.
In Europe, British English is usually taught. And the same applies for Mainland China, India and the Phillipines.
lol
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,685
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,689
@14,684 (I)
Yeah, in Britain. The further away you go from Britain, the more International English is taught. Also, British English has changed so much over the past few centuries that American English is actually closer the English that was spoken in the 17th century. British English is only taught more in those other places because of British colonization. And actually, you're still wrong, because in most of those places that English has changed so much that it can't even really be called British English anymore. American English is still called International English.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,692
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
No, in the rest of Europe British English is usually taught. And the same for China and India.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous I double-posted this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,693
@14,689 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4) > American English is still called International English.
[citation needed]
I looked it up; it's not.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,695
@14,689 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4) > American English is still called International English.
No, it's not.
Also, the majority of countries still learn British English over American English.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,702
@previous (A)
No, it isn't. English is the lingua franca of the 21st century and the United States is the main reason for this. This is why International English follows American English more closely than British English. "British" English may be taught in those places you mentioned, but as I said, that's only because of the historical influence the British Empire had on those places, and I put "British" in quotations because if you actually go to those places you find that their own culture has modified the English enough that it's really their own English. In Singapore, their English can practically be called Singapore English. I'm also hard pressed to believe that you if go to these places you wouldn't find that American terms and pronunciation have not influenced the way they talk, especially in places like Hong Kong where there are so many American business men. That is why International English follows American English so closely. The United States is the most influential country in the world, no matter how much some people resent that fact.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#14,872
Broseph are you stupid or just dumb?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#15,104
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
They speak Chinese, lol.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#15,292
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I have; British English.
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#15,623
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I would imagine that any ESL teacher would have to teach American English because it's far more verbose.
Anonymous O double-posted this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#15,633
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Tell a Briton about getting pissed on an aluminum elevator.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 20 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#16,887
YOU SHOULD BE SHITLISTED FOR NOT USING THE QUEEN'S ENGLISH
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,040
@previous (O)
You should be shitlisted for using incorrect grammar.
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.) > I can't help it you were afraid of the French during their revolution, and decided to adopt their spelling to appease them. Fucktard.
umad?
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,047
@previous (A)
You ſhould be ſhitlisted for not uſing the proper verſion of the "S" like I am.
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,048
I'd bet 80% of Americans couldn't pronounce PHLEGM
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,053
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.) @17,047 (O) SHITLISTED!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,055
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,065
Oh God sorry you are
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,066
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
So why aren't you uſing the curved "S"?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,069
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Why are you so mad?
We know our language is far better. There is no need to be jelly about it, you can use it too.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,086
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I didn't personally. But, as we are the master race, I believe that it is the better way of spelling the word "colour".
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#17,125