Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#841,797
16bitch here:
If you were veiwing time from the perspective of a particle that moves infinitely fast, then it would appear as though the entire universe is completely still. This means that from your perspective there would be no such thing as "time". All the matter in the universe would be at a permanent standstill. This means that averything, including dinners, would be "frozen" in time.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#841,803
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 29 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#841,810
@previous (C)
obviously infinitely fast things do, in fact, move infinitely fast.
16bitch replied with this 8 years ago, 11 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,868
@841,803 (C)
Yes, but if it did, we wouldn't know about it. It's impossible to prove a false positive, so in this situation I am slightly more correct than you are.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,877
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 43 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,939
@841,877 (Syntax)
I didn't say anything about the speed of light. I said nothing moves INFINITELY fast. Please give an example of a particle that moves at infinite speed. Thanks.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,945
@previous (C)
One example is the singularity in the description of black holes. Solutions of the equations of the general theory of relativity allow for finite mass distributions of zero size, and thus occurs at infinite speed.
From Wiki - "In particle physics, an elementary particle or fundamental particle is a particle not known to have any substructure, thus it is not known to be made up of smaller particles. If an elementary particle truly has no substructure, then it is one of the basic building blocks of the universe from which all other particles are made. In the Standard Model of particle physics, the elementary particles include the fundamental fermions (including quarks, leptons, and their antiparticles), and the fundamental bosons (including gauge bosons and the Higgs boson). Although elementary particles are not made up of smaller particles, some of them may change to lighter particles (according to specific rules)."
There is so much that is not understood at this point of time. For you to say nothing moves INFINITELY fast is to discount science. Just because you cannot find proof today is no reason to limit your mind just because you cannot see past today.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,948
@previous (E)
Yes, I would have accepted 'gauge boson' as an example of a massless particle.
But honestly, until 16bitch explains what he meant by 'a particle that moves infinitely fast', it's hard to even know what that means.
It's almost gibberish...
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#841,950