Topic: Is there any scientific evidence that bisexuality exists?
Anonymous A started this discussion 8 years ago #69,372
Please provide your proof here. Otherwise I will continue to believe that bisexuality is simply made up.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #840,012
Are you asking for a friend?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #840,014
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #840,016
yes, there really are people who are attracted to both men and women.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #840,019
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #840,022
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #840,036
@840,019 (A)
What kind of proof are you looking for? Do you want to see a person having sex with both men and women?
What kind of proof are you looking for? Do you want to see a person having sex with both men and women?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #840,039
@840,014 (A)
How exactly do you know your friend has a gaping sewer pipe. Did that friend ask you to fill it up? Did you ask your friend if it was ok for you to fill it up?
How exactly do you know your friend has a gaping sewer pipe. Did that friend ask you to fill it up? Did you ask your friend if it was ok for you to fill it up?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #840,040
@840,036 (C)
I need proof that there are people who are attracted to both men and women, not just who have sex with both men and women.
I need proof that there are people who are attracted to both men and women, not just who have sex with both men and women.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #840,041
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,071
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,092
@840,040 (A)
the proof is the people who are attracted to both men and women. it's like asking if there is scientific evidence that water exists.
the proof is the people who are attracted to both men and women. it's like asking if there is scientific evidence that water exists.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,096
@previous (C)
Is there scientific evidence that water exists?
@840,040 (A)
Can you prove that there are people who are only attracted to one sex?
Can you prove that attraction even exists?
Is there scientific evidence that water exists?
@840,040 (A)
Can you prove that there are people who are only attracted to one sex?
Can you prove that attraction even exists?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 24 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,098
@previous (H)
Do scientists even exist? I'm not talking about people just using the scientific method to confirm or deny falsifiable hypotheses. I need scientific proof there are people who can give me scientific proof.
Do scientists even exist? I'm not talking about people just using the scientific method to confirm or deny falsifiable hypotheses. I need scientific proof there are people who can give me scientific proof.
Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,099
@previous (I)
But can proof even be scientific? Maybe science is just a buzzword for unprovable things that still make sense, and religion is the buzzword for unprovable things that don't make sense.
But can proof even be scientific? Maybe science is just a buzzword for unprovable things that still make sense, and religion is the buzzword for unprovable things that don't make sense.
Anonymous I replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,100
@previous (H)
Can proof even be proof? Maybe proof is just buzzword for people exposed to things who aren't willing to doubt their senses.
Can proof even be proof? Maybe proof is just buzzword for people exposed to things who aren't willing to doubt their senses.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 19 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,323
threads not grate
Anonymous F replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #840,325
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,345
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,349
@previous (A)
I can help you with that. Heterosexuality is the norm and the alternative of sex in the sewer is not the norm.
Proof of heterosexuality is simply in birth rates. Otherwise there wood be nada
I can help you with that. Heterosexuality is the norm and the alternative of sex in the sewer is not the norm.
Proof of heterosexuality is simply in birth rates. Otherwise there wood be nada
Fuck Dogg joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,387
@previous (Syntax)
> I can help you with that. Heterosexuality is the norm and the alternative of sex in the sewer is not the norm.
> Proof of heterosexuality is simply in birth rates. Otherwise there wood be nada
Sound science
> I can help you with that. Heterosexuality is the norm and the alternative of sex in the sewer is not the norm.
> Proof of heterosexuality is simply in birth rates. Otherwise there wood be nada
Sound science
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,557
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,560
Your mother.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,561
Anonymous J replied with this 8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #840,585
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #840,758
@OP
are you that merrin faggot who's been smegging up the other chan?
are you that merrin faggot who's been smegging up the other chan?