Topic: Would you support a policy that made it harder for Muslims to enter the US?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #6,815
This is not a discussion on it's legality, or constitutional basis.
Would you support making muslims enter the US a more difficult process?
Would you support making muslims enter the US a more difficult process?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes. | 8 | 30% | |
| No. | 19 | 70% |
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #119,647
No. I have nothing against Muslims.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,648
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,651
@previous (A)
I'm absolutely against it. It's unnecessarily restrictive and violent, and is particularly horrible for women. I support a complete separation of church and state anyway.
I'm absolutely against it. It's unnecessarily restrictive and violent, and is particularly horrible for women. I support a complete separation of church and state anyway.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,654
Yeah I would. Its impossible to ignore all the bad shit that goes with Muslims.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,657
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,664
muslims, for the most part, do not assimilate in the societies they enter.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #119,666
It should be harder for anyone to enter any country other than their own for permanent residence. People should stay where their cultures are.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #119,672
How could this not be a discussion of it's constitutional basis or legality?
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #119,680
!poISOnioxc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,689
What? why Muslims in particular.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,807
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,808
@119,689 (!poISOnioxc)
Because that's what this thread is about. What other answer could you hope to get?
Because that's what this thread is about. What other answer could you hope to get?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,813
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,814
@119,648 (A)
> a few Muslims immigrate to a country
> brix are shat over the surely imminent sharia law, which will obviously be brought in and enforced by less than 10% of the population.
I dislike Muslim extremists as much as the next person, but could people stop brining up Sharia law all the damn time? A few Muslims coming in doesn't mean that Sharia law will suddenly spring up put of nowhere. Christ.
> a few Muslims immigrate to a country
> brix are shat over the surely imminent sharia law, which will obviously be brought in and enforced by less than 10% of the population.
I dislike Muslim extremists as much as the next person, but could people stop brining up Sharia law all the damn time? A few Muslims coming in doesn't mean that Sharia law will suddenly spring up put of nowhere. Christ.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,815
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,816
@119,689 (!poISOnioxc)
Because they are particularily extreme among the world religions. Easily the most extreme.
Because they are particularily extreme among the world religions. Easily the most extreme.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,818
@119,814 (J)
Given todays political climate its entirely possible for Muslims to have more power someday here in America. In France they are allowed to block of whole areas. There is a town in... Michigan I think, where Muslims have completely taken over -- its what they do. They are quite open about their plan of populating the planet with their offspring and putting Sharia law into effect everywhere, in fact they see it as their religious duty.
Given todays political climate its entirely possible for Muslims to have more power someday here in America. In France they are allowed to block of whole areas. There is a town in... Michigan I think, where Muslims have completely taken over -- its what they do. They are quite open about their plan of populating the planet with their offspring and putting Sharia law into effect everywhere, in fact they see it as their religious duty.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,820
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,834
@119,815 (A)
@119,807 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I don't give a fuck what y'all call it. you racists.
@119,807 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I don't give a fuck what y'all call it. you racists.
!poISOnioxc replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,842
test
Meowth joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,856
No, but I would support a policy that made it harder for Mexicans to enter the US. Only because lots of them come over illegally and abuse our system. Most other races from what I know get in legally and try to get a real life. I may be wrong, so feel free to correct me if I am.
Foxygen !FANATICibM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,864
lol at my state banning sharia law
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,866
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,881
@119,814 (J)
It's like saying let in a few communists and people think communism will spring up out of nowhere!
It's like saying let in a few communists and people think communism will spring up out of nowhere!
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,882
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos triple-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,886
@119,856 (Meowth)
lol wtf man
Mexicans are cool people. Problem is you have a bad economy. That's the only reason you worry about Mexican immigrants. Fix your economy and you won't be so worried about it. Also, end the drug war and stop the massive political instability and hundreds of thousands of deaths in causes in mexico and central/south america that drug prohibition causes and people won't want to leave their countries so bad.
lol wtf man
Mexicans are cool people. Problem is you have a bad economy. That's the only reason you worry about Mexican immigrants. Fix your economy and you won't be so worried about it. Also, end the drug war and stop the massive political instability and hundreds of thousands of deaths in causes in mexico and central/south america that drug prohibition causes and people won't want to leave their countries so bad.
Foxygen !FANATICibM replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,892
Meowth replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,899
@119,886 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I'm pretty Mexican and not saying they're uncool people, but it's true we have a bad economy. I really don't worry about them, but I can see where people come from when they're tax money is going to those illegal immigrants.
I'm pretty Mexican and not saying they're uncool people, but it's true we have a bad economy. I really don't worry about them, but I can see where people come from when they're tax money is going to those illegal immigrants.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,904
@previous (Meowth)
yeah, they should totally be denied basic human services to save a few buck. America is full enough, we don't need to have a sense of civic noblity anymore.
yeah, they should totally be denied basic human services to save a few buck. America is full enough, we don't need to have a sense of civic noblity anymore.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,921
@119,899 (Meowth)
> they're
Yes this money should be spent on education LOL
@previous (D)
There is no such thing as "basic human services". Statism got us into this problem, more statism will not get us out.
Civic nobility is the idea of citizens working for the community, not the government forcing regulation and taking tax.
> they're
Yes this money should be spent on education LOL
@previous (D)
There is no such thing as "basic human services". Statism got us into this problem, more statism will not get us out.
Civic nobility is the idea of citizens working for the community, not the government forcing regulation and taking tax.
Meowth replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,929
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,934
That's like trying to stop wildfires by cutting down all forests.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,937
@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
> That's like trying to stop wildfires by cutting down all forests.
Ironically there is a method of cutting huge swaths through large forests to prevent tremendous wildfires.
> That's like trying to stop wildfires by cutting down all forests.
Ironically there is a method of cutting huge swaths through large forests to prevent tremendous wildfires.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,955
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,957
@119,818 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
The French are pussies anyway. And blocking off a street != imposing Sharia law. :-|
The French are pussies anyway. And blocking off a street != imposing Sharia law. :-|
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,965
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,966
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,967
@119,965 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
We have fewer Muslims than most other European states. Not that Americans are capable of paying attention to anything other than stereotypes anyway. ;)
G2BED
We have fewer Muslims than most other European states. Not that Americans are capable of paying attention to anything other than stereotypes anyway. ;)
G2BED
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,968
People can do whatever the fuck they want.
If that includes moving into a different country, so be it.
If that includes moving into a different country, so be it.
American replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,969
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
BUT THEY'RE INVADING OUR COUNTRY AND IMPOSING MUSLAMIC LAW ON US AND FORCING US TO SPEAK MOSQUE!111
BUT THEY'RE INVADING OUR COUNTRY AND IMPOSING MUSLAMIC LAW ON US AND FORCING US TO SPEAK MOSQUE!111
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,970
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,971
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,972
@119,970 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah. :D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx6lupC6WyE
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah. :D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx6lupC6WyE
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,973
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,974
@119,972 (N)
> Britain to be about British
> Interracial law
> Muslamic infidel
Christ, I knew he was thick from the brief clips I've seen, but I had no idea he was this bad. Fucking lol'd.
> Britain to be about British
> Interracial law
> Muslamic infidel
Christ, I knew he was thick from the brief clips I've seen, but I had no idea he was this bad. Fucking lol'd.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,975
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,977
@119,968 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Please qualify that statement with "as long as it does not infringe upon other's rights", otherwise murder would be okay.
Please qualify that statement with "as long as it does not infringe upon other's rights", otherwise murder would be okay.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 57 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,984
Nega !34Kas0OdzM double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,985
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 46 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,025
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,140
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,145
Nah. Iranians are cool and Muslims aren't as bad here as they are in Europe.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,149
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,159
More zionistic bullshit. Sharia lae wouldnt effect us in the slightest. Too many people are scared of what ifs, especially when they dont take into consideration of practicality with upholding said laws.
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,176
@previous (Tekamine !AnRbswGQv.)
You mean... the same way evangelical Christianity hasn't impacted our laws or policies? (At least their laws are only moderately goofy.) Reality is, get a critical mass of practicing Muslims in a given area, and they will start agitating for all sorts of shit. It is a religion intent on world dominance; it doesn't play well with others.
I think it's a great idea. There are no 'what ifs'; it's clear what happens when you get too many Muslims based on the many examples.
And it is in fact very practical for the U.S. to implement immigration policies like this, since we already have so much practice with it. I'm assuming you have no familiarity at all with U.S. immigration policy or history?
You mean... the same way evangelical Christianity hasn't impacted our laws or policies? (At least their laws are only moderately goofy.) Reality is, get a critical mass of practicing Muslims in a given area, and they will start agitating for all sorts of shit. It is a religion intent on world dominance; it doesn't play well with others.
I think it's a great idea. There are no 'what ifs'; it's clear what happens when you get too many Muslims based on the many examples.
And it is in fact very practical for the U.S. to implement immigration policies like this, since we already have so much practice with it. I'm assuming you have no familiarity at all with U.S. immigration policy or history?
(Edited 51 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,183
ITT: Muslims are a hivemind, each and every one of them hell-bent on taking over the world
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,185
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,471
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,475
How would you do that, exactly? Islam is a religion, not a race. Any attempt would probably be racist against Arabs.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,496
Yes. Islam is a violent religion.
Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them [the infidels] wherever ye find them".
Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them [the infidels] wherever ye find them".
TTEH !penisGseqs replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,500
@previous (V)
Lol. Now that verse in context:
"Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loves not transgressors. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. But if they cease! God is oft-forgiving, most merciful. If they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression." (2:190-193)
I agree Islam is a violent religion though.
Lol. Now that verse in context:
"Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loves not transgressors. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. But if they cease! God is oft-forgiving, most merciful. If they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression." (2:190-193)
I agree Islam is a violent religion though.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,505
@previous (TTEH !penisGseqs)
I don't see how Christianity and Judaism are any better; they're all profoundly similar.
I don't see how Christianity and Judaism are any better; they're all profoundly similar.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,521
@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Christians may believe in weird shit too, but people don't get stoned in Christian nations, and neither do they treat women nearly as badly as in Muslim countries.
And Reform Jews are just closet atheists. The few Orthodox Jews are few.
Christians may believe in weird shit too, but people don't get stoned in Christian nations, and neither do they treat women nearly as badly as in Muslim countries.
And Reform Jews are just closet atheists. The few Orthodox Jews are few.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #120,541
@previous (A)
But other bad things do happen.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/abuse-by-irish-nuns-examined-by-the-un-20110526-1f6e8.html
But other bad things do happen.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/abuse-by-irish-nuns-examined-by-the-un-20110526-1f6e8.html
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,712
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,713
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos triple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,715
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,717
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,720
@120,541 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I heard an atheist did something bad once. Maybe it was just a rumor
I heard an atheist did something bad once. Maybe it was just a rumor
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,721
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,732
I was merely stating that horrible things are still being caused by Christian religions even now.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,733
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I agree. Any religion is capable of giving its followers a reason to do horrible things.
I agree. Any religion is capable of giving its followers a reason to do horrible things.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,741
Anonymous R replied with this 15 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,795
no i dont
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,858
@120,733 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Lolno
People do bad things without religion. Ergo, religion doesn't cause people to do bad things.
Lolno
People do bad things without religion. Ergo, religion doesn't cause people to do bad things.
.mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,859
@120,741 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
No, they should be allowed to do whatever doesn't violate others consent
No, they should be allowed to do whatever doesn't violate others consent
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,903
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,905
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,924
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,935
I strongly think TTEH is a Muslim due to his constant defense of his faith. Killer Lettuce might be one too.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #120,946
@previous (W)> I strongly think TTEH is a Muslim due to his constant defense of his faith. Killer Lettuce might be one too.
Mountainman detected.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,038
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,039
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,458
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,463
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,502
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,521
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,526
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,534
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
This has nothing to do with me.
You are objectively retarded if at 15 or 16 or whatever you are you can not see that actions that violate another rights are not permissible.
This has nothing to do with me.
You are objectively retarded if at 15 or 16 or whatever you are you can not see that actions that violate another rights are not permissible.
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,539
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,541
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,546
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
That's your opinion.
Mine is that people don't have - or shouldn't have - rights.
That's your opinion.
Mine is that people don't have - or shouldn't have - rights.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,547
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
So if I came into your house with a knife, you would willingly forfeit your right to self-defence?
So if I came into your house with a knife, you would willingly forfeit your right to self-defence?
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,550
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,559
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #121,584
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 52 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,624
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
So you're a hardcore anarchist then, and you're saying that no one has a right to self-defense, they simply have the ability, or don't have the ability, to defend themselves? Just as the person who comes into your house to attack you with a knife doesn't really have a right to do so, but simply has the power to and does so. Am I following you correctly?
So you're a hardcore anarchist then, and you're saying that no one has a right to self-defense, they simply have the ability, or don't have the ability, to defend themselves? Just as the person who comes into your house to attack you with a knife doesn't really have a right to do so, but simply has the power to and does so. Am I following you correctly?
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,627
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Hmm. I'm not sure I'm an anarchist, but the rest is completely correct.
Hmm. I'm not sure I'm an anarchist, but the rest is completely correct.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,629
@previous (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
So I could enter your house and murder you and everyone you love? And you have no right to stop me, and the authorities have no right to punish me?
So I could enter your house and murder you and everyone you love? And you have no right to stop me, and the authorities have no right to punish me?
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,635
@previous (N)
I have the ability to stop you. Actually, I probably don't, so yes.
The authorities have the ability to punish you.
By the same token, you don't have the right to enter my house and murder me and everyone I love, although they're not even in my house, but you have the ability to and so you can.
I have the ability to stop you. Actually, I probably don't, so yes.
The authorities have the ability to punish you.
By the same token, you don't have the right to enter my house and murder me and everyone I love, although they're not even in my house, but you have the ability to and so you can.
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,636
I'm conflicted...I hate kikes.
But foreskin is disgusting.
But foreskin is disgusting.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,642
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,646
@121,635 (Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6)
Do you acknowledge that my system leads to peace and justice while yours leads to violence and injustice?
Do you acknowledge that my system leads to peace and justice while yours leads to violence and injustice?
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,648
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,651
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,656
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,673
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,689
@121,656 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
@previous (The Editor !FuckWtfW8M)
I love you so much right now.
@previous (The Editor !FuckWtfW8M)
I love you so much right now.
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,690
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,692
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,700
@121,642 (A)
<3
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Might as well be, for all it matters on the Internet~
<3
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Might as well be, for all it matters on the Internet~