Topic: do you refer to your clothing as "garments"

Sheila LaBoof started this discussion 8 years ago #67,927

as in, only the finest garments may adorn your body

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #829,351

Only under garments

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,352

I call things that go on the top of your body "tops" and things that go underneath as "bottoms".

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,356

I refer to my clothing as “vestements”. Thanks.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,357

@previous (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Vestements isn't a word. Vestments refers to clothing worn by clergy members. Vêtements is a word, but surely a master linguist like yourself would never misspell French, nor would such a worldly man be so pretentious as to use random French words in normal English conversation?

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,360

@829,356 (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Your nouveau riche is showing.

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,368

@829,357 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Look into Medieval English and you might change your mind.

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc double-posted this 8 years ago, 20 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,369

@829,360 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
*Old Money

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,371

@829,351 (B)
That's what I was going to say, but do understand that undergarments is pronounced as one word. Thanks.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 57 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #829,373

@829,357 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
damlol

@829,368 (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
This is the 21st century. Pretentious, new money frivolities disregarded.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #829,383

@829,369 (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Old money never refers to garments as "vestments". Thanks.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #829,402

@829,368 (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Surely such a worldly man as yourself wouldn't be so pretentious as to use medieval English in regular conversation.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,406

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)

I have been to several more continents then has Matt.

Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,433

Only when I rend them.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,435

@previous (Meta)
What about when adoring crowds gather and reach to the hem of them?

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,451

@829,406 (I)
I have been to every continae except Antarctica.

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc double-posted this 8 years ago, 31 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,453

@829,402 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I, in fact, do.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,458

@previous (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
So you're a pretentious fuckpig.

Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,460

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I think it is.

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,461

@829,458 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It’s not pretension, if you actually are that educated.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,466

@previous (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Yes it is. Choosing to not blend in by purposely speaking in a manner that is unnecessarily difficult to understand is pretentious.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,472

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
To me, it is not unnecessarily difficult, but perfectly natural. It would be, in fact, unnatural, were My parlance otherwise.

Anonymous H replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,479

@previous (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
> open leg vulva

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,565

@829,472 (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
Yeah because you're an utter prat

Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,566

"parlance" in the French manner no doubt

Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,678

@829,565 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
One man’s prat, is another man’s gentleman.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #829,679

@previous (Chesty LaRue™ !6BuuqU1Ncc)
> open leg vulva

Minichan