Topic: Proof the IRC user "Ghostlog" is not Indy
Meta started this discussion 8 years ago #67,797
"Ghostlog" brought Indy's name into disrepute by soliciting child pornography. The real Indy would never do this to himself. Therefore "Ghostlog" cannot, in fact, be Indy.
QED.
QED.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #828,185
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #828,192
@OP
Nice Mattlogic™ (pronounced as one word).
Nice Mattlogic™ (pronounced as one word).
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #828,198
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
But you're only telling us this. You have no "actual" proof.
But you're only telling us this. You have no "actual" proof.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,211
As a person on the internet, I can confirm MAtt has never ever embarrassed himself.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,214
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,215
Meta (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 12 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,331
It was Syntax. Who else would have the means and motive to pull a boner like this off?