Topic: Thee thy or eye re: CRYING EYE AM RE: QUALCOMM ET APPLE
Alvin !brap/pFYes started this discussion 8 years ago #67,771
q. joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #828,041
whats that red car in the parking lot, is what i want to know
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #828,042
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,053
There are 39 separate buildings that comprise the Qualcomm campus in San Diego and many others elsewhere.
More Samsung phones than Apple and Drones are using one mass amount of Qualcomm CPU's but yea Apple is angry re paying for patents it does not own.
The more exciting NOT is the news today that Broadcom is moving back to USA and Trump is touting fake news cause only the small Singapore operation that acquired Broadcom is moving to USA - Most has always been here from GetGo including those who sued Qualcomm back a bit
Broadcom of note makes the CPU for Raspberry Pi and is also the company that gave Apple major fits recently re chip that could be hacked by a 6 year old as many did
More Samsung phones than Apple and Drones are using one mass amount of Qualcomm CPU's but yea Apple is angry re paying for patents it does not own.
The more exciting NOT is the news today that Broadcom is moving back to USA and Trump is touting fake news cause only the small Singapore operation that acquired Broadcom is moving to USA - Most has always been here from GetGo including those who sued Qualcomm back a bit
Broadcom of note makes the CPU for Raspberry Pi and is also the company that gave Apple major fits recently re chip that could be hacked by a 6 year old as many did
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,055
inb4 apple stops using qualcomm
Anonymous E double-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,056
Anonymous E triple-posted this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,057
curious what it be - perhaps apple enters the flyswatters making business or they will make and deliver burgers like Tesla perhaps
i wonder who left that comment
i wonder who left that comment
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,058
Surfer boy re: KOK KOL KOK
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,059
@828,056 (E)
> also qualcomm way overcharges for those patents
No one forces any company to use the patents. They can design stuff without them.
@828,056 (E)
Intel tried n tried to make the Atom do what Qualcomm does and failed so they bought a company that pays the Brits for the rites to use ARM technology
No question Apple is trying to find a way to get out cheap as any company should but no matter what happens Apple ends up stuck on patents from Qualcomm like the no connect charging and other patents it long ago tried to find a work a round -
> also qualcomm way overcharges for those patents
No one forces any company to use the patents. They can design stuff without them.
@828,056 (E)
Intel tried n tried to make the Atom do what Qualcomm does and failed so they bought a company that pays the Brits for the rites to use ARM technology
No question Apple is trying to find a way to get out cheap as any company should but no matter what happens Apple ends up stuck on patents from Qualcomm like the no connect charging and other patents it long ago tried to find a work a round -
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #828,090
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,294
@828,059 (Syntax)
they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit, the vast majority of which they had nothing to do with.
they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit, the vast majority of which they had nothing to do with.
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,301
@previous (E)
Until recently I was under orders by US Gov to say nada about the situation - But the bottom line which business is always about - Apple cannot stop using Qualcomm. TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE - Which is one crying complaint Apple has about Q. AND it gets even more much more worse for Apple when 5G hits full speed.
The real crying Apple has is over the Patents to make 4GLTE possible which is worth 7X more in cash than the chips. Any company that uses 4GLTE is stuck paying Q for the necessary patents to make it work. Companies could of course revert to CDMA but of course that is fully Qualcomm patents
> they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit
My wallet is most pleased about such arrangement
Until recently I was under orders by US Gov to say nada about the situation - But the bottom line which business is always about - Apple cannot stop using Qualcomm. TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE - Which is one crying complaint Apple has about Q. AND it gets even more much more worse for Apple when 5G hits full speed.
The real crying Apple has is over the Patents to make 4GLTE possible which is worth 7X more in cash than the chips. Any company that uses 4GLTE is stuck paying Q for the necessary patents to make it work. Companies could of course revert to CDMA but of course that is fully Qualcomm patents
> they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit
My wallet is most pleased about such arrangement
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,318
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,319
Syntax joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,333
@828,318 (E)
What makes 4GLTE works is all about the Patent holder "Q" for the majority of the mandated 4GLTE Standard
And again the patents are worth far more by 6X in Billions than the Chips - Many "Q" Investors argue that the company should split off Chips and Patents cause well $$$$
@previous (H)
> jesus christ lol
My understanding is that Jesus the Jew was short a Shekel or 2
What makes 4GLTE works is all about the Patent holder "Q" for the majority of the mandated 4GLTE Standard
And again the patents are worth far more by 6X in Billions than the Chips - Many "Q" Investors argue that the company should split off Chips and Patents cause well $$$$
@previous (H)
> jesus christ lol
My understanding is that Jesus the Jew was short a Shekel or 2
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,336
@previous (Syntax)yeah. 4g lte is a miniscule part of a smartphone. why does qualcomm feel they deserve to be paid for work they did not do or own any rights to?
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,337
@previous (E)
> 4g lte is a miniscule part of a smartphone
LOL Really? I suppose you have no need for Texting - Video - Phone -
> feel they deserve to be paid for work they did not do or own any rights to?
Why on Planet Earth did Apple and others agree to sign the contracts4? Perhaps the Attorneys needed to take my Reading English 101 course.
> 4g lte is a miniscule part of a smartphone
LOL Really? I suppose you have no need for Texting - Video - Phone -
> feel they deserve to be paid for work they did not do or own any rights to?
Why on Planet Earth did Apple and others agree to sign the contracts4? Perhaps the Attorneys needed to take my Reading English 101 course.
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,339
@previous (Syntax)
i didnt say it was an unnecessary part, but its a small part. let's say qualcomm is responsible for 3% of an iphone, they are basing their price on the work the other 97%
also, they signed it because qualcomm forced them.
i didnt say it was an unnecessary part, but its a small part. let's say qualcomm is responsible for 3% of an iphone, they are basing their price on the work the other 97%
also, they signed it because qualcomm forced them.
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,342
@previous (E)
CPU and Modem 3%?
Your math is a bit fuzzy.
> they signed it because qualcomm forced them.
Not once have I attended one of those contract meetings. So you are saying guns were at Steve Jobs head back at the GetGo or a Knife LOL
Fact is Apple keeps Attorney's very very busy in many a law suit and such is life in business. What I like is that Samsung still sells more phones than Apple - One should stay tuned re 5G and the Future cause the Beta tests are not only 95% complete there are systems in many a place on Planet Earth running 5G currently and Damn just DAMN
CPU and Modem 3%?
Your math is a bit fuzzy.
> they signed it because qualcomm forced them.
Not once have I attended one of those contract meetings. So you are saying guns were at Steve Jobs head back at the GetGo or a Knife LOL
Fact is Apple keeps Attorney's very very busy in many a law suit and such is life in business. What I like is that Samsung still sells more phones than Apple - One should stay tuned re 5G and the Future cause the Beta tests are not only 95% complete there are systems in many a place on Planet Earth running 5G currently and Damn just DAMN
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,343
Anonymous C replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,346
@828,053 (Syntax)
> There are 39 separate buildings that comprise the Qualcomm campus in San Diego and many others elsewhere.
>
> More Samsung phones than Apple and Drones are using one mass amount of Qualcomm CPU's but yea Apple is angry re paying for patents it does not own.
>
> The more exciting NOT is the news today that Broadcom is moving back to USA and Trump is touting fake news cause only the small Singapore operation that acquired Broadcom is moving to USA - Most has always been here from GetGo including those who sued Qualcomm back a bit
>
> Broadcom of note makes the CPU for Raspberry Pi and is also the company that gave Apple major fits recently re chip that could be hacked by a 6 year old as many did
@828,059 (Syntax)
> No one forces any company to use the patents. They can design stuff without them.
>
>
>
> Intel tried n tried to make the Atom do what Qualcomm does and failed so they bought a company that pays the Brits for the rites to use ARM technology
> No question Apple is trying to find a way to get out cheap as any company should but no matter what happens Apple ends up stuck on patents from Qualcomm like the no connect charging and other patents it long ago tried to find a work a round -
@828,301 (Syntax)
> Until recently I was under orders by US Gov to say nada about the situation - But the bottom line which business is always about - Apple cannot stop using Qualcomm. TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE - Which is one crying complaint Apple has about Q. AND it gets even more much more worse for Apple when 5G hits full speed.
>
> The real crying Apple has is over the Patents to make 4GLTE possible which is worth 7X more in cash than the chips. Any company that uses 4GLTE is stuck paying Q for the necessary patents to make it work. Companies could of course revert to CDMA but of course that is fully Qualcomm patents
>
> >they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit
>
> My wallet is most pleased about such arrangement
@828,333 (Syntax)
> What makes 4GLTE works is all about the Patent holder "Q" for the majority of the mandated 4GLTE Standard
>
> And again the patents are worth far more by 6X in Billions than the Chips - Many "Q" Investors argue that the company should split off Chips and Patents cause well $$$$
>
>
>
> > jesus christ lol
>
> My understanding is that Jesus the Jew was short a Shekel or 2
yeah?
> There are 39 separate buildings that comprise the Qualcomm campus in San Diego and many others elsewhere.
>
> More Samsung phones than Apple and Drones are using one mass amount of Qualcomm CPU's but yea Apple is angry re paying for patents it does not own.
>
> The more exciting NOT is the news today that Broadcom is moving back to USA and Trump is touting fake news cause only the small Singapore operation that acquired Broadcom is moving to USA - Most has always been here from GetGo including those who sued Qualcomm back a bit
>
> Broadcom of note makes the CPU for Raspberry Pi and is also the company that gave Apple major fits recently re chip that could be hacked by a 6 year old as many did
@828,059 (Syntax)
> No one forces any company to use the patents. They can design stuff without them.
>
>
>
> Intel tried n tried to make the Atom do what Qualcomm does and failed so they bought a company that pays the Brits for the rites to use ARM technology
> No question Apple is trying to find a way to get out cheap as any company should but no matter what happens Apple ends up stuck on patents from Qualcomm like the no connect charging and other patents it long ago tried to find a work a round -
@828,301 (Syntax)
> Until recently I was under orders by US Gov to say nada about the situation - But the bottom line which business is always about - Apple cannot stop using Qualcomm. TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE - Which is one crying complaint Apple has about Q. AND it gets even more much more worse for Apple when 5G hits full speed.
>
> The real crying Apple has is over the Patents to make 4GLTE possible which is worth 7X more in cash than the chips. Any company that uses 4GLTE is stuck paying Q for the necessary patents to make it work. Companies could of course revert to CDMA but of course that is fully Qualcomm patents
>
> >they are charging a percentage of the price of the full unit
>
> My wallet is most pleased about such arrangement
@828,333 (Syntax)
> What makes 4GLTE works is all about the Patent holder "Q" for the majority of the mandated 4GLTE Standard
>
> And again the patents are worth far more by 6X in Billions than the Chips - Many "Q" Investors argue that the company should split off Chips and Patents cause well $$$$
>
>
>
> > jesus christ lol
>
> My understanding is that Jesus the Jew was short a Shekel or 2
yeah?
Meta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,347
@828,343 (G)
They're free to use non-Qualcomm technology just like the Chinese made their own 4g network to get around Q patents.
They're free to use non-Qualcomm technology just like the Chinese made their own 4g network to get around Q patents.
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,363
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,367
@828,347 (Meta)
"Nine of the top 10 Chinese handset manufacturers pay royalties on "Q" wireless technologies.
The one that does not has does not even use 3G
Data 2016
"Nine of the top 10 Chinese handset manufacturers pay royalties on "Q" wireless technologies.
The one that does not has does not even use 3G
Data 2016
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,370
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,373
@previous (G)
I suppose you want more in2 2017
The one Chinese company that does not pay still uses GSM and has a very small share of China's market.
I suppose you want more in2 2017
Recent Developments Revenues in China, for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were $5.4 billion, a We shipped approximately 187 million Mobile Station Modem (MSM) integrated circuits for CDMA- and OFDMA-based wireless devices, a decrease of 7% compared to approximately 201 million MSM integrated circuits in the year ago quarter. Despite the decline in MSM shipments, QCT's revenues increased compared to the year ago quarter
primarily due to an increase in revenues related to radio frequency front end (RFFE) products, primarily from our recently formed RF360 Holdings joint venture, and connectivity shipments.
Worldwide 3G/4G connections (CDMA-based, OFDMA-based and CDMA/OFDMA multimode) grew sequentially by approximately 3% to approximately 4.5 billion, which was approximately 59% of total cellular connections
primarily due to an increase in revenues related to radio frequency front end (RFFE) products, primarily from our recently formed RF360 Holdings joint venture, and connectivity shipments.
Worldwide 3G/4G connections (CDMA-based, OFDMA-based and CDMA/OFDMA multimode) grew sequentially by approximately 3% to approximately 4.5 billion, which was approximately 59% of total cellular connections
The one Chinese company that does not pay still uses GSM and has a very small share of China's market.
Anonymous G replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,374
Syntax replied with this 8 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #828,392
So one might ask YMy wallet is open with a smile