Topic: Joshy dingles the dangling dongle of underage Thai labyboys.
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 started this discussion 8 years ago #67,622
He prances about Bangkok in a Victorian opera cape, flitting from underage labyboy bar to underage ladyboy bar. Also, Joshy eats peepee.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #826,789
you are both pedos though
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,791
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 55 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,793
@826,789 (B)
Nope. He literally went to Thai prison for doing the deed, AND his “comix” are of naked toddlers being molested by authority figures.
Nope. He literally went to Thai prison for doing the deed, AND his “comix” are of naked toddlers being molested by authority figures.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,795
@previous (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
yes that is true but that doesnt make you less of a pedophile (sexually attracted to children)
yes that is true but that doesnt make you less of a pedophile (sexually attracted to children)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,796
> claims others are obsessed with him, yet continues to obsess over TG.
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 29 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,802
@826,795 (B)
I am no such thing. I am not sexually attracted to people 12 and under (the definition itself). I am only attracted to human females aged 18 and above. Thanks.
I am no such thing. I am not sexually attracted to people 12 and under (the definition itself). I am only attracted to human females aged 18 and above. Thanks.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #826,803
@previous (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
You are on record begging an underage child to show her vulva to you.
You are on record begging an underage child to show her vulva to you.
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,806
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
No, I am not. A user named “Ghostlog” is. That was someone pretending to be me. If you disagree, post any sort of evidence. Thanks.
No, I am not. A user named “Ghostlog” is. That was someone pretending to be me. If you disagree, post any sort of evidence. Thanks.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,816
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,818
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,820
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,821
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,822
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,823
@826,821 (B)
Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, especially that of a single witness with an agenda. Someone was pretending to be me. Unless you have evidence otherwise, then you are simply demonstrating your obsession.
Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, especially that of a single witness with an agenda. Someone was pretending to be me. Unless you have evidence otherwise, then you are simply demonstrating your obsession.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #826,825
@previous (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
yes but we are not in a court. i know the witness. i trust them more than i trust you.
yes but we are not in a court. i know the witness. i trust them more than i trust you.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,827
@826,823 (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
> Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, especially that of a single witness with an agenda. Someone was pretending to be me. Unless you have evidence otherwise, then you are simply demonstrating your obsession.
Ok, let us reverse this one.
Can you provide any evidence that TG has served time in a Thai prison, or sexually assaulted underage labyboys, or are you just demonstrating your obsession over him?
> Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, especially that of a single witness with an agenda. Someone was pretending to be me. Unless you have evidence otherwise, then you are simply demonstrating your obsession.
Ok, let us reverse this one.
Can you provide any evidence that TG has served time in a Thai prison, or sexually assaulted underage labyboys, or are you just demonstrating your obsession over him?
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,829
@826,825 (B)
All fine, but no evidence. Also, how would the witness have known who Ghostlog was? Anyone could have used that username.
All fine, but no evidence. Also, how would the witness have known who Ghostlog was? Anyone could have used that username.
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) double-posted this 8 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,830
@826,827 (D)
I have plenty of evidence. I requested the information from the Bangkok police through contacts, and I received it.
I have plenty of evidence. I requested the information from the Bangkok police through contacts, and I received it.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,831
@previous (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
> I have plenty of evidence. I requested the information from the Bangkok police through contacts, and I received it.
Then why don't you show us said evidence?
> I have plenty of evidence. I requested the information from the Bangkok police through contacts, and I received it.
Then why don't you show us said evidence?
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,832
@previous (D)
Because I have no obligation to prove anything to a bunch of Autists on an obscure chan. Thanks.
Because I have no obligation to prove anything to a bunch of Autists on an obscure chan. Thanks.
Anonymous B replied with this 8 years ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,833
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,834
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,836
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,838
@previous (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)
And there is overwhelming evidence that you asked an underage girl for pics of her vulva.
And there is overwhelming evidence that you asked an underage girl for pics of her vulva.
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,839
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,840
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,844
@826,839 (McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6)Obsession you say? Every thread here about TG has been started by you. My, you must be obsessed......
McTurnip™ !f0eFrsAqV6 (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,846
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,848
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,849
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,851
Anonymous D double-posted this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,853
@826,849 (A)Oh, looky here, more TG obsession evidence matt!
Yet, you still show no evidence of TG ever being arrested, or any proof of sexual assault.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,854
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 7 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,952
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 44 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,956
I’d like to see the proof
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 18 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,959
Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,962
@previous (D)
I’d love for it to be true but it’s clear MAtt is lying. If there was a modicum of truth then he’d at least post something more specific in his usual autistic ways.
I’d love for it to be true but it’s clear MAtt is lying. If there was a modicum of truth then he’d at least post something more specific in his usual autistic ways.
Anonymous D replied with this 8 years ago, 53 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #826,964
@previous (E)
That's true. And usually when he knows he's been busted, he doesn't reply any more, as he has done here.
He then thinks by posting anonymously, that it will throw us off.
That's true. And usually when he knows he's been busted, he doesn't reply any more, as he has done here.
He then thinks by posting anonymously, that it will throw us off.