Topic: Anal sex has good reasons to be banned in a statist society.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos started this discussion 15 years ago #6,736
1. Health - HIV/AIDS and other STIs are more common in the homosexual comunity.
2. Health - Damage to the anus - fissures, prolapse.
3. Moral - Some people find the act morally objectionable.
4. Economic - The current system requires an expanding population to cover welfare liabilities. Anal sex does not lead to precreation.
5. Benefit to Society - The damage it does and the risks it brings to society outweigh the individual's "right" to practise society.
6. Protection of Minors - Practictioners of anal sex will invariably attempt to lure minors into their practise and convince them that it is normal and right.
Yet we all (rightly so) consider anal sex to be a citizen's prerogative, and not an area for government intervention.
These same arguments can be made for a wide range of activities (notably, drugs). We must ask ourselves how we could affirm these priniciples for one act and deny them for another.
In a statist society, no one's rights are secure. The same arguments used to prohibit certain substances could be used to prohibit certain sexual practices.
We should therefore reject government intervention (state violence) on principle. That principle:
Government shall neither legislate upon:
The behavior of a citizen that affects none but himself; nor
The consensual behavior of two citizens.
Do you accept or reject this principle?
2. Health - Damage to the anus - fissures, prolapse.
3. Moral - Some people find the act morally objectionable.
4. Economic - The current system requires an expanding population to cover welfare liabilities. Anal sex does not lead to precreation.
5. Benefit to Society - The damage it does and the risks it brings to society outweigh the individual's "right" to practise society.
6. Protection of Minors - Practictioners of anal sex will invariably attempt to lure minors into their practise and convince them that it is normal and right.
Yet we all (rightly so) consider anal sex to be a citizen's prerogative, and not an area for government intervention.
These same arguments can be made for a wide range of activities (notably, drugs). We must ask ourselves how we could affirm these priniciples for one act and deny them for another.
In a statist society, no one's rights are secure. The same arguments used to prohibit certain substances could be used to prohibit certain sexual practices.
We should therefore reject government intervention (state violence) on principle. That principle:
Government shall neither legislate upon:
The behavior of a citizen that affects none but himself; nor
The consensual behavior of two citizens.
Do you accept or reject this principle?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accept. | 12 | 52% | |
| Reject. | 11 | 48% |
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #117,924
lol
Also, inb4 over 200 hundred replies.
Also, inb4 over 200 hundred replies.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #117,925
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #117,926
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #117,953
> Health - HIV/AIDS and other STIs are more common in the homosexual comunity.
Not true
> 2. Health - Damage to the anus - fissures, prolapse.
One can hurt themselves with risky sex positions too, as long as you are careful the chance of you being harmed is highly unlikely.
> 3. Moral - Some people find the act morally objectionable.
Please this is based totally on perspective, a lot of morally objectionable acts are socially accepted.
> 4. Economic - The current system requires an expanding population to cover welfare liabilities. Anal sex does not lead to procreation.
Are you serious? Are you trying to imply that it's better for young women to get pregnant (Possibly not being able to support their future child financially and also ruining their education) than to practice anal sex.
> 5. Benefit to Society - The damage it does and the risks it brings to society outweigh the individual's "right" to practise society.
Their are other activities that are legal and damaging yet have no benefit to society (Smoking).
> 6. Protection of Minors - Practictioners of anal sex will invariably attempt to lure minors into their practise and convince them that it is normal and right.
Minors can be lead to have vaginal sex too.
Not true
> 2. Health - Damage to the anus - fissures, prolapse.
One can hurt themselves with risky sex positions too, as long as you are careful the chance of you being harmed is highly unlikely.
> 3. Moral - Some people find the act morally objectionable.
Please this is based totally on perspective, a lot of morally objectionable acts are socially accepted.
> 4. Economic - The current system requires an expanding population to cover welfare liabilities. Anal sex does not lead to procreation.
Are you serious? Are you trying to imply that it's better for young women to get pregnant (Possibly not being able to support their future child financially and also ruining their education) than to practice anal sex.
> 5. Benefit to Society - The damage it does and the risks it brings to society outweigh the individual's "right" to practise society.
Their are other activities that are legal and damaging yet have no benefit to society (Smoking).
> 6. Protection of Minors - Practictioners of anal sex will invariably attempt to lure minors into their practise and convince them that it is normal and right.
Minors can be lead to have vaginal sex too.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #117,957
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #117,961
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #117,999
I agree.
inb4 30 people didn't read the whole OP and jump to conclusions
inb4 30 people didn't read the whole OP and jump to conclusions
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,000
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,010
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,021
@117,924 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Lol I understand now. People will not read the whole thing before they post :(
Lol I understand now. People will not read the whole thing before they post :(
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,022
vote Ron Paul 2012!
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,029
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,031
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,033
sup to4str?
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #118,039
@118,031 (D)
No other candidate could put forth a systematic exposition of their principles and policies like. Dr Paul did in The Revolution.
No other candidate could put forth a systematic exposition of their principles and policies like. Dr Paul did in The Revolution.
Bookshelf !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,156
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
Wtf, you're not even American. Stop talking about Ron Paul and go vote for Kangaroo Jack.
Wtf, you're not even American. Stop talking about Ron Paul and go vote for Kangaroo Jack.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 57 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,207
Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,230
> mountainman
Stopped reading there.
Stopped reading there.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,234
Shit, I read the first few points and clicked 'reject' without reading it. I agree with you, OP, even if your arguments against anal sex are not true.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,241
Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,259
@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Hm. I feel like "a strong anal enthusiast and primary leader of the global fisting movement" would be more fitting.
Hm. I feel like "a strong anal enthusiast and primary leader of the global fisting movement" would be more fitting.
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,262
Giving Anal sex is fun.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,266
@previous (Tekamine !AnRbswGQv.)No fun allowed bro.
@OP
Lol, interesting way to say the status quite.is not so bad after all.
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,269
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,285
> The consensual behavior of two citizens.
What if that second consents to be murdered and eaten? How do you define "citizen"? What about children and people with mental deficiencies?
What if that second consents to be murdered and eaten? How do you define "citizen"? What about children and people with mental deficiencies?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,365
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,368
> implying AIDS is the fault of anal sex rather than globalisation
Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,386
@118,365 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)Unfortunately, I lost all the physical copies of the cards I had, so this will have to do.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,390
Wood seem that those who need a smelly nasty loaded with germs alternative to a sweet smelling self lubricating pleasure center women have built in, are what they are.
Dats all I B saying on this topic for the momento
Dats all I B saying on this topic for the momento
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,399
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,403
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,544
@118,234 (I)
Thank you for rereading. The arguments are not my own, of course. I completely reject the use of state violence to enforce morality.
Thank you for rereading. The arguments are not my own, of course. I completely reject the use of state violence to enforce morality.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,547
@118,285 (I)
We currently forbid euthanasia. We force people to suffer to their death.
We must protect certain classes of people, but preferably by family and citizens associations rather than state violence.
We currently forbid euthanasia. We force people to suffer to their death.
We must protect certain classes of people, but preferably by family and citizens associations rather than state violence.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,549
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) quadruple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,550
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) quintuple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,552
I wonder what those 8 people were actually rejecting.
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,554
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
You should have stated the question in the beginning, derped it up with the tl;dr then restated the question again.
You should have stated the question in the beginning, derped it up with the tl;dr then restated the question again.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,557
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,568
@118,552 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
They read topic: Anal sex has good reasons to be banned in a statist society. and then a load of derp in the topic
and then click reject
They read topic: Anal sex has good reasons to be banned in a statist society. and then a load of derp in the topic
and then click reject
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,572
@previous (I)
Don't think that they just do that on MC. Elections coming up, they will hear a slogan and vote based upon that.
Don't think that they just do that on MC. Elections coming up, they will hear a slogan and vote based upon that.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,573
@118,568 (I)
> mountainman post/poll
> stop reading at mountainman
> options are something like “agree with OP†or “disagreeâ€
> pick disagree
> mountainman post/poll
> stop reading at mountainman
> options are something like “agree with OP†or “disagreeâ€
> pick disagree
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,576
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,588
@118,572 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
> Don't think that they just do that on MC
Well they do. My limit is 4 lines and if it's still retarded after that then I give up.
> Don't think that they just do that on MC
Well they do. My limit is 4 lines and if it's still retarded after that then I give up.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,592
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,600
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
Most people don't. Most people, when they see you making arguments against anal sex, assume you're being as retarded as you usually are.
Most people don't. Most people, when they see you making arguments against anal sex, assume you're being as retarded as you usually are.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,612
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,742
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,783
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,791
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,794
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,799
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk replied with this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,858
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,861
@118,799 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
Reread, and ask 'is this post retarded?'. If the answer is no, do not make that post.
Reread, and ask 'is this post retarded?'. If the answer is no, do not make that post.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,866
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,869
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,871
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,894
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,902
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
A: Reread, and ask 'is this post retarded?'. If the answer is no, do not make that post.
B: I do.
A: You reread, ask yourself if the post is retarded, decide it is retarded and then post it?
B: NO THAT'S NOT WHAT I SAID
A: Yes it is.
A: Reread, and ask 'is this post retarded?'. If the answer is no, do not make that post.
B: I do.
A: You reread, ask yourself if the post is retarded, decide it is retarded and then post it?
B: NO THAT'S NOT WHAT I SAID
A: Yes it is.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,932
@118,549 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
> They are what they are, but we should not use state violence to change them.
Yea I have no problem with those who wish to cover their dicks with Feces. Its all about free will and if they are of such a mind to cover a body part with Feces so it b.
But I wood make one guess. THEY do not nor never wish to think about FECES all over their Prick.
> They are what they are, but we should not use state violence to change them.
Yea I have no problem with those who wish to cover their dicks with Feces. Its all about free will and if they are of such a mind to cover a body part with Feces so it b.
But I wood make one guess. THEY do not nor never wish to think about FECES all over their Prick.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,934
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,953
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,959
No, I'm not. @previous (I)
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,974
> hurf durf I'm using the internet.swf
I read and understood it, but it looks like it was written by somebody actively aiming for verbosity.
I read and understood it, but it looks like it was written by somebody actively aiming for verbosity.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #118,985
@118,959 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I said that you should read posts and if you think they are not retarded, don't post them (meaning that you should only post things you think are retarded). Then you said that you do that, which means that you read the post, consider it retarded and then post it, even though you think it is retarded. Then you say that that's not what you do, and then say that you follow my advice.
Meaning your answers re the retarded test are:
1. I post things I consider retarded
2. I don't post things I consider retarded
Contradictory claims.
I said that you should read posts and if you think they are not retarded, don't post them (meaning that you should only post things you think are retarded). Then you said that you do that, which means that you read the post, consider it retarded and then post it, even though you think it is retarded. Then you say that that's not what you do, and then say that you follow my advice.
Meaning your answers re the retarded test are:
1. I post things I consider retarded
2. I don't post things I consider retarded
Contradictory claims.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,004
of course mountainman makes a post about how gays are "inferior".
I bet he still believes sodomy is a sin.
I bet he still believes sodomy is a sin.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,007
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,012
Meowth joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,013
@119,007 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
There goes Nexus, rolling in his Lexus. Nigga ain't a juggalo, but damn he could juggle hoes.
There goes Nexus, rolling in his Lexus. Nigga ain't a juggalo, but damn he could juggle hoes.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,033
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #119,035
@119,004 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
You did what I did. Protip - ignore the anti-anal posts and read that last bit.
You did what I did. Protip - ignore the anti-anal posts and read that last bit.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,145
@118,985 (I)
I'm so sorry! I've been posting from my phone all day. I went back and reread your post. I had mentally corrected your post to be logical! I completely apologize for my misunderstanding.
I hereby clarify:
I check my posts before I post them. If they are retarded, I do not post them.
Sorry again for the confusion!
I'm so sorry! I've been posting from my phone all day. I went back and reread your post. I had mentally corrected your post to be logical! I completely apologize for my misunderstanding.
I hereby clarify:
I check my posts before I post them. If they are retarded, I do not post them.
Sorry again for the confusion!
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,147
@119,004 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
Did you even read the post...
Why did you put quotation marks around something that I didn't say?
Did you even read the post...
Why did you put quotation marks around something that I didn't say?
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,148
It's 50/50 but several people have either admitted to not reading the whole post before voting, or have made posts ITT that strongly indicate that they did not read the whole post, which makes it hard to know what people really think.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,182
@119,145 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
> I had mentally corrected your post to be logical
My post was 100% logical. If you think a post is not retarded, do not post it. If you think a post is retarded, post it. This is the only way to improve your posting.
> I had mentally corrected your post to be logical
My post was 100% logical. If you think a post is not retarded, do not post it. If you think a post is retarded, post it. This is the only way to improve your posting.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,518
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,522
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
If you think a post is retarded, then it is actually not that retarded. If you think a post is reasonable, ti is retarded. Make your posts according to this priniciple.
If you think a post is retarded, then it is actually not that retarded. If you think a post is reasonable, ti is retarded. Make your posts according to this priniciple.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,533
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,542
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,544
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,558
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,562
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,569
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,577
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #119,585
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,945
@119,533 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Yikes I just looked way back and must say this: Condoms break/leak/
I am 100% sure this is true because I have a daughter as a result!!
Yikes I just looked way back and must say this: Condoms break/leak/
I am 100% sure this is true because I have a daughter as a result!!
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 38 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,950
green joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,954
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,955
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,958
@121,950 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
I am going to hold that age back and Y? DM will take the age and hit Harvard Medical School's data base and try and locate her by age, and considering that she has no clue I am her biological father, tis just not a good idea to put ammunition in such a demented persons hands.
Out of here till AM
2morrow is major $$$$ decision day re do I buy one more House or go Condo for investment - Must decided in AM after I surf my Ocean Blue
G'd nite all
I am going to hold that age back and Y? DM will take the age and hit Harvard Medical School's data base and try and locate her by age, and considering that she has no clue I am her biological father, tis just not a good idea to put ammunition in such a demented persons hands.
Out of here till AM
2morrow is major $$$$ decision day re do I buy one more House or go Condo for investment - Must decided in AM after I surf my Ocean Blue
G'd nite all
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #121,974
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #122,184
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
er no. I do not know the limits on ages admitted to Harvard Med School, but looking at just one photo of one class, all looked about the same age.
http://hms.harvard.edu/admissions/default.asp?page=requirements
Bottom line for admissions to that school mean its going to take 6 years of Premed to get in all the liberal arts with the added science, math, physics. So yes most students will be two years older upon entering Grad school aka Harvard Med.
Then there is Matt M who took 19 years just for his MA and in liberal arts lol
Men can be 95 and still end up as new dads. Look at Larry King lol
er no. I do not know the limits on ages admitted to Harvard Med School, but looking at just one photo of one class, all looked about the same age.
http://hms.harvard.edu/admissions/default.asp?page=requirements
Bottom line for admissions to that school mean its going to take 6 years of Premed to get in all the liberal arts with the added science, math, physics. So yes most students will be two years older upon entering Grad school aka Harvard Med.
Then there is Matt M who took 19 years just for his MA and in liberal arts lol
Men can be 95 and still end up as new dads. Look at Larry King lol
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #122,195
@previous (Syntax)
Are you capable of typing anything longer than four sentences that does not mention Matt Miller?
Are you capable of typing anything longer than four sentences that does not mention Matt Miller?
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #122,198
@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Proof?
YES
edited: lots n lots of posts this am - it is still am here and 99% do not have anything related too
You know what
Bet you thought you were about to trap me eh
Nice try no cigar.
Proof?
YES
edited: lots n lots of posts this am - it is still am here and 99% do not have anything related too
You know what
Bet you thought you were about to trap me eh
Nice try no cigar.
(Edited 1 minute later.)